Micah Prescott wrote:Mr B wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:So if the refs give Dez the catch and the Cowboys win somehow NOW that means Romo was "clutch"?
You are seriously incapable of seeing the glaringly obvious flaw in that logic?
You HAVE to ignore the score when judging 1 player on a 53 man team. Simple as that.
Also Aikman himself says Romo is better than him. Give Romo Aikman's roster and Romo might have 4 rings.
Yes if Romo is somehow able to win that game and advance to the NFC title game it looks better for him. He didn’t though. He lost, like he always did. That’s his legacy like it or not.
Wrong Tony Romo didn't lose.
The Dallas Cowboys lost
That's reality like it or not.
Tony should be judged on how HE played as an individual. Not on how the team as a whole finished.
THE SAME WAY YOU JUDGE EVERY OTHER POSITION
That’s not how legacies are determined though. A QB’s legacy will always be determined by how much success he did or didn’t have. The only time a QB is determined great without playoff success is if he’s holds several NFL records when he retires, even then though it’s not a guaranteed. Romo doesn’t hold any NFL records, doesn’t have any real playoff success, and even blew a #1 seed. As far as All Time Cowboys QB’s I don’t even have him ahead of Danny White. Danny White never won a title but he had much more playoff success than Romo has.























