

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
VooDoo7 wrote:Quick no BS story which may shed some light.
Bucks were on the road last month in New Orleans. After the game Boogie couldn't find his watch which he had in his locker. He went on a tirade, asking some players if they took it. Then accusing/questioning some staff, and then some Smoothie King staffers. Never found it.
Fast forward to the next day back in MKE, and the watch is in his locker. Instead of apologizing to everyone, he laughed it off and said 'I bet someone planted it here when we got back".
I don't think he was real popular with the other guys...
Ron Swanson wrote:It only took 5 years, but I'm much excited for the Langston Galloway era to begin in Milwaukee.
![]()
Ron Swanson wrote:So all this "locker room" talk is based on absolutely zero evidence other than conjecture and assumptions based on Boogie's past history and personality on the court, right? Like, what the hell are we even doing here?
Bobby flexes after every dunk and jaws with officials to the extent that his teammates need to regularly calm him down (see: Middleton yelling at him in Game 6), so he's not a "culture" guy either, right? Need to stop lobbing this accusation at every player after-the-fact simply because they're not a wholesome Boy Scout (PJ, Boogie, rinse-repeat).
emunney wrote:I'm just saying that if trying to find his watch is the problem, maybe we're looking too hard for a problem. Of course, you can do the most benign thing like a total **** and maybe that's what happened.
It sounds to me like he thought someone took his watch and someone DID take his watch.
emunney wrote:M-C-G wrote:emunney wrote:
It's going to be really funny when we sign him to a 10 day tomorrow and everybody has to walk back all this ****.
For me, both things can absolutely be true. I am hoping there is an intent to bring him back if he can't find a better deal, I feel like this was part of the arrangement with him.
That said, how he handles himself seems like it has been an issue dogging him throughout his career. Classic why not both scenario.
I'm just saying that if trying to find his watch is the problem, maybe we're looking too hard for a problem. Of course, you can do the most benign thing like a total **** and maybe that's what happened.
It sounds to me like he thought someone took his watch and someone DID take his watch.
M-C-G wrote:
Wow, what a reference. I couldn't wait for Dom to be written off the show, such a massive swing and a miss for a show that was so solid for so long.
Ayt wrote:emunney wrote:M-C-G wrote:
For me, both things can absolutely be true. I am hoping there is an intent to bring him back if he can't find a better deal, I feel like this was part of the arrangement with him.
That said, how he handles himself seems like it has been an issue dogging him throughout his career. Classic why not both scenario.
I'm just saying that if trying to find his watch is the problem, maybe we're looking too hard for a problem. Of course, you can do the most benign thing like a total **** and maybe that's what happened.
It sounds to me like he thought someone took his watch and someone DID take his watch.
I read it as if the dumbass left it in his locker back home and forgot about it.
VooDoo7 wrote:Quick no BS story which may shed some light.
Bucks were on the road last month in New Orleans. After the game Boogie couldn't find his watch which he had in his locker. He went on a tirade, asking some players if they took it. Then accusing/questioning some staff, and then some Smoothie King staffers. Never found it.
Fast forward to the next day back in MKE, and the watch is in his locker. Instead of apologizing to everyone, he laughed it off and said 'I bet someone planted it here when we got back".
I don't think he was real popular with the other guys...
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Is it any different than those saying we did it because the owners are cheap?
They have made cost moves
Seems more likely that this was always going to be a 10-day contract and keeping that spot open.
Guy will always have offensive talent and grab some boards, but I cringed everytime he tried dunking.
skones wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Is it any different than those saying we did it because the owners are cheap?
Yes.They have made cost moves
Right. That's the point.Seems more likely that this was always going to be a 10-day contract and keeping that spot open.
Well no, because it wasn't a 10-day at all.Guy will always have offensive talent and grab some boards, but I cringed everytime he tried dunking.
Kewel.
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Not sure how you (or the op I was responding to) can point to owners history of being cheap as evidence but dismiss Boogie being an ass for most of his career as a pure speculation. Both are pure speculation with very supportive history.
And sorry, I misspoke and said 10-day contract when i should have said signed him to a non-guaranteed contract where he would have to be released in 40-days unless they wanted to keep him. Basically a 40-day contract with an option on 1/7.
skones wrote:The counterpoint to Boogie, as much as it makes my extremely annoyed, is keeping Wes.
MVP2110 wrote:Does anyone know anything about Jeff Dowtin Jr?