Scoot McGroot wrote:?s=21
I know you’re just passing this along but GEEZ Carlisle this is getting annoying dramatically dragging this rehab out to the media as you’re doing.
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Scoot McGroot wrote:?s=21
Pacers Forever wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:?s=21
I know you’re just passing this along but GEEZ Carlisle this is getting annoying dramatically dragging this rehab out to the media as you’re doing.
Scoot McGroot wrote:.......and if he is hypothetically back in weeks, but kinths, then he’d be back in a relatively fair timeline according to the injury he had.
Tom White wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:.......and if he is hypothetically back in weeks, but kinths, then he’d be back in a relatively fair timeline according to the injury he had.
HA! Just one question. How many days are in a "kinth"? Is that like multiple fortnights?
Scoot McGroot wrote:Tom White wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:.......and if he is hypothetically back in weeks, but kinths, then he’d be back in a relatively fair timeline according to the injury he had.
HA! Just one question. How many days are in a "kinth"? Is that like multiple fortnights?
Fat thumb on my iPhone meant months.
Wizop wrote:no need to spoil the tank now. I hope we can resign him.
boomershadow wrote:I'm really only interested in bringing him back if it is for the vet min.
Scoot McGroot wrote:boomershadow wrote:I'm really only interested in bringing him back if it is for the vet min.
That would be the bargain of the century.
I’d imagine he gets offers of $15m plus per year.
pacers33granger wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:boomershadow wrote:I'm really only interested in bringing him back if it is for the vet min.
That would be the bargain of the century.
I’d imagine he gets offers of $15m plus per year.
That seems pretty high to me. That number wouldn't really be a buy low for anyone. Sure, a buy low based on him being at his best, but not given the injury history. If someone goes that high I would imagine it would be a very team friendly deal with non-guaranteed money like Zach Collins got from SAS.
Scoot McGroot wrote:I’d imagine he gets offers of $15m plus per year.
Tom White wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:I’d imagine he gets offers of $15m plus per year.
Let's hope any offers along those lines would be from another team. That's too much for a guy who can't stay healthy and is just an average to maybe slightly above average player.
Even if he's completely healthy now it's a gamble if he will be for the contract. And there's not many teams with that kind of space so you're looking at a sign and trade or some sort of cap creativity. Which probably means burning an asset or two as well.Scoot McGroot wrote:pacers33granger wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
That would be the bargain of the century.
I’d imagine he gets offers of $15m plus per year.
That seems pretty high to me. That number wouldn't really be a buy low for anyone. Sure, a buy low based on him being at his best, but not given the injury history. If someone goes that high I would imagine it would be a very team friendly deal with non-guaranteed money like Zach Collins got from SAS.
Doug’s getting almost $14m per. If Warren were healthy, would he get anything less than $25m? Remember, $15m per is less than 1/8th the salary cap, or around 12%. It’s not a whole heckuva lot. If we really think he’s a “buy low candidate”, it’s probably closer to $7-8m, right? Definitely not a vet minimum, unless he’s not going to be cleared for camp?