Reeko wrote:Their numbers are nearly identical across the board. In his role on defense, Mobley has done exceedingly well but, he also isn't tasked with guarding the best perimeter players on the other team the same way that Barnes has.
Okay? Call me when we have instances of Barnes shutting down some of the best perimeter players, including one time in the final seconds, like Mobley has and then I'll be impressed.
Reeko wrote:You want to make an argument that Mobley's been better as a rookie, it will definitely have merit. But please stop with this nonsense that he's been head and shoulders above Barnes, because he hasn't been.
Yes, he has. His defensive impact far outweighs Barnes. The fact that their stats are nearly identical across the board with that in mind indicates that Barnes literally has no possible argument over Mobley right now.
Reeko wrote:They're both very good supporting pieces for decent teams. I don't know why you're acting like the Cavs are world beaters, when they're in 6th place in the East. Mobley's not out there, scoring 20 points and grabbing 10 boards a night, he's averaging 15 and 8... the same as Scottie Barnes.
Again, Mobley's defense has been the biggest impact he's had on the team, and right now, he's in all team defense consideration. That is leagues above what Barnes is doing right now. To claim Mobley is a supporting piece for Cleveland is downright laughable. He's literally anchoring their defense, which by the way is third in the league right now.
Lalouie wrote:note. no allen or garland. i'm not saying the execs are right but this IS about perceived value,,,,for all those who this garland/allen are all that
I think the idea is that they're picking the most valuable player from each team. And while Mobley isn't the Cavaliers best player, he is certainly their most valuable one.