ImageImageImage

The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 12,626
And1: 9,539
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#21 » by Triple7 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:17 am

fallguy wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I personally think there is a decent chance the Celtics might end up with De'Aaron Fox. I'm not in love with the player but I think there is a chance.

If I was the Kings front office I would look to move Fox, Bagley, Hield and Barnes for as much of a rebuilding package as I could get and start building the team around Haliburton and Mitchell. Kings are going nowhere.


Yeah, this is the kind of big swing that might actually be available - and one that wouldn't cost Jaylen.

I'm pretty lukewarm on him -- it's a lot of upside and downside potential with that salary. But he's probably tradeable again for good value so it's intriguing. Problem is you can't play him and Smart together at all.


You can’t play Smart with any player, especially to end games.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,823
And1: 3,349
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#22 » by Jammer » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:43 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:I'm going to disagree with the whole premise here. (And with Cousy as well, who famously thought that Chauncey Billups would never be a championship PG.)

The Celtics are currently being coached to a Popovich/.5 system. No one distributor should or can control that.

And by the way, no recent repeat champion has been built around that kind of PG. No Phil Jackson team was built that way. That's not Popovich's model. That's not what Steph Curry does. It's not how the Heatles operated.

But it’s the player that this Celtics team needs the most.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,466
And1: 24,180
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#23 » by playa-hater » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:48 am

return2glory wrote:Yam.


:o

and the chance of Coach, "I don't play young players Ime" starting him would be 0.000000012%
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,466
And1: 24,180
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#24 » by playa-hater » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:51 am

gocelts wrote:We have 3 point guards.

All it takes is good coach to tell them when to stop taking bad shots, take them out when they aren’t playing D, and coach them up….

Why everyone is giving Ime a pass
on this and saying “we need a point guard” is sort of baffling.


did you just say everyone??
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,466
And1: 24,180
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#25 » by playa-hater » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:58 am

Not sure any PG league wide that is what we need becomes available. Or will be hard to get. Such as Murray or Hali. With where Boston might be drafting (lottery) I would think a talented PG may be there. But is there a single Koolaid drinking poster that believes Ime can/will develop him? Certainly not as a rookie.
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,067
And1: 27,933
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#26 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:32 am

Jammer wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:I'm going to disagree with the whole premise here. (And with Cousy as well, who famously thought that Chauncey Billups would never be a championship PG.)

The Celtics are currently being coached to a Popovich/.5 system. No one distributor should or can control that.

And by the way, no recent repeat champion has been built around that kind of PG. No Phil Jackson team was built that way. That's not Popovich's model. That's not what Steph Curry does. It's not how the Heatles operated.

But it’s the player that this Celtics team needs the most.


The Celtics' 3 best players are 2 natural SFs -- both switchable to other positions on defense -- and a C. Smart is probably their 4th best.

Your assertion is not obviously correct.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,860
And1: 61,086
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#27 » by Parliament10 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 6:01 am

Agreed. We need a Starter Quality PG. -- Until we get one, I would move Pritchard up to Starting PG.
I also think that we need to make some Trades, preferably Mid-season, but at least by the Off-season.

Trade: (In the following order of importance.)
Schröder
Richardson
Hernangómez
(Smart)


Proposed Rotation A, 2021-22:
Starters: Starting PG - Brown - Tatum - Grant - R. Williams
Rotation: Pritchard - Smart - Nesmith - Horford - Kanter
Reserves: XXXX? - Langford - XXXX?/XXXX? - Fernando
Two-Ways: Thomas - Hauser
Stashed: Madar - Begarin


Proposed Rotation B, 2021-22:
Starters: Pritchard - Brown - Tatum - Grant - R. Williams
Rotation: Smart - Langford - Nesmith - Horford - Kanter
Reserves: 3rd PG - 3rd SG - 3rd SF - 3rd PF - Fernando
Two-Ways: Thomas - Hauser
Stashed: Madar - Begarin
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,067
And1: 27,933
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#28 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:31 am

Parliament10 wrote:Agreed. We need a Starter Quality PG. -- Until we get one, I would move Pritchard up to Starting PG.
I also think that we need to make some Trades, preferably Mid-season, but at least by the Off-season.

Trade: (In the following order of importance.)
Schröder
Richardson
Hernangómez
(Smart)


Proposed Rotation A, 2021-22:
Starters: Starting PG - Brown - Tatum - Grant - R. Williams
Rotation: Pritchard - Smart - Nesmith - Horford - Kanter
Reserves: XXXX? - Langford - XXXX?/XXXX? - Fernando
Two-Ways: Thomas - Hauser
Stashed: Madar - Begarin


Proposed Rotation B, 2021-22:
Starters: Pritchard - Brown - Tatum - Grant - R. Williams
Rotation: Smart - Langford - Nesmith - Horford - Kanter
Reserves: 3rd PG - 3rd SG - 3rd SF - 3rd PF - Fernando
Two-Ways: Thomas - Hauser
Stashed: Madar - Begarin


Why are you eager to trade Richardson?
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,696
And1: 6,063
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#29 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:04 am

Triple7 wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:I am not completely sold that we have to have a PG

Smart has been doing quite well when he actually is at the PG spot as opposed to player SG beside Schroder

Yeah, he is shooting poorly, but when he is the PG he focuses far more on driving the lane (and he is finishing) and moving the ball. Cannot really complain about that when you have a team with 2 25+ppg scorers and a center who loves to move the ball.

I believe we are far better served with a wing who can shoot and pass. McColum, Hayward, BRogdon would be perfect.


Come on man! I know you really love Smart. It shows because i haven’t seen you include Smart in any of your trade scenarios lol. Seriously, Smart have been our weakness at the last 2mins of a close game, that other teams constantly takes advantage. His lack of shooting really kills us, apart from really head scratching decisions he’s made as a point guard. We are better off having a player inside that can shoot and score to finish games. We need a true point guard if we can find one, or get a decent shooting point guard. Smart should just go or be a 6th man. That should be his role.



I dont disagree with you.

But again, right now the biggest issue is shooting.

And without trading a jay I dont think its possible to find a better pg than smart
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,696
And1: 6,063
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#30 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:08 am

Also, imo, richardson is a capable point guard.

So there is that.

His best season ever was in Miami when he was the defacto PG.
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,852
And1: 1,987
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#31 » by celtxman » Wed Jan 12, 2022 12:04 pm

With the Celtics situation trades are tough. You can't keep Horford and Smart and add another salary. So you either keep the PG situation, get a cheaper option, or trade Smart and/or Horford. Personally I would like to add Malcolm Brogdon and subtract Marcus Smart. But that would require a third team as if Indiana was dumping salaries Smart isn't an option. They could be interested in the Horford contract, but it would be easier for them to get an expiring contract and how do you replace Horford?
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,696
And1: 6,063
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#32 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:08 pm

celtxman wrote:With the Celtics situation trades are tough. You can't keep Horford and Smart and add another salary. So you either keep the PG situation, get a cheaper option, or trade Smart and/or Horford. Personally I would like to add Malcolm Brogdon and subtract Marcus Smart. But that would require a third team as if Indiana was dumping salaries Smart isn't an option. They could be interested in the Horford contract, but it would be easier for them to get an expiring contract and how do you replace Horford?



RE Brogdon, it would also include either a CBA rule change or a wait till the offseason.

The only really logical step to make this season is to acquire a shooter to start at the sg-sf spot that only costs a combination of Schroder/Horford/Romeo/Nesmith/2nds/Juancho.

Or if the plan is to wait on the offseason then just move Horford to the bench, which also would help.

JRich is hitting ~ 0% from 3 this year and would be an immediate improvement to spacing to Als less <30%


Smart
Jrich
Brown
Tatum
Williams


Bench
Schroder (Gross)
Romeo
Nesmith
GrantW
Horford


Pretty solid 1-8 then rely on ?marks with Romeo, Pritch and Nesmith. But I am ok with giving them run as they are a key component to the celtics future one way or another.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#33 » by ddb » Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:47 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:
celtxman wrote:With the Celtics situation trades are tough. You can't keep Horford and Smart and add another salary. So you either keep the PG situation, get a cheaper option, or trade Smart and/or Horford. Personally I would like to add Malcolm Brogdon and subtract Marcus Smart. But that would require a third team as if Indiana was dumping salaries Smart isn't an option. They could be interested in the Horford contract, but it would be easier for them to get an expiring contract and how do you replace Horford?



RE Brogdon, it would also include either a CBA rule change or a wait till the offseason.

The only really logical step to make this season is to acquire a shooter to start at the sg-sf spot that only costs a combination of Schroder/Horford/Romeo/Nesmith/2nds/Juancho.

Or if the plan is to wait on the offseason then just move Horford to the bench, which also would help.

JRich is hitting ~ 0% from 3 this year and would be an immediate improvement to spacing to Als less <30%


Smart
Jrich
Brown
Tatum
Williams


Bench
Schroder (Gross)
Romeo
Nesmith
GrantW
Horford


Pretty solid 1-8 then rely on ?marks with Romeo, Pritch and Nesmith. But I am ok with giving them run as they are a key component to the celtics future one way or another.


With the roster as-is I agree with this, mostly.

Smart-JRich-Brown-Tatum-Timeord
Pritchard-Schroder-Romeo-Grant-Horford.....Sorry Nesmith but I haven't seen him do anything good yet this season. Very disappointing.

All a moot point though, as I'm pretty confident Stevens is going to rework the team a bit outside of Tatum/Brown
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,696
And1: 6,063
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#34 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:57 pm

ddb wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:
celtxman wrote:With the Celtics situation trades are tough. You can't keep Horford and Smart and add another salary. So you either keep the PG situation, get a cheaper option, or trade Smart and/or Horford. Personally I would like to add Malcolm Brogdon and subtract Marcus Smart. But that would require a third team as if Indiana was dumping salaries Smart isn't an option. They could be interested in the Horford contract, but it would be easier for them to get an expiring contract and how do you replace Horford?



RE Brogdon, it would also include either a CBA rule change or a wait till the offseason.

The only really logical step to make this season is to acquire a shooter to start at the sg-sf spot that only costs a combination of Schroder/Horford/Romeo/Nesmith/2nds/Juancho.

Or if the plan is to wait on the offseason then just move Horford to the bench, which also would help.

JRich is hitting ~ 0% from 3 this year and would be an immediate improvement to spacing to Als less <30%


Smart
Jrich
Brown
Tatum
Williams


Bench
Schroder (Gross)
Romeo
Nesmith
GrantW
Horford


Pretty solid 1-8 then rely on ?marks with Romeo, Pritch and Nesmith. But I am ok with giving them run as they are a key component to the celtics future one way or another.


With the roster as-is I agree with this, mostly.

Smart-JRich-Brown-Tatum-Timeord
Pritchard-Schroder-Romeo-Grant-Horford.....Sorry Nesmith but I haven't seen him do anything good yet this season. Very disappointing.

All a moot point though, as I'm pretty confident Stevens is going to rework the team a bit outside of Tatum/Brown



Well, he kind of has to right?

If nothing else at all is done he cannot keep Schroder.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,823
And1: 3,349
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#35 » by Jammer » Wed Jan 12, 2022 2:41 pm

Well, I do think that Josh Richardson is a better player, and better running the team, than Marcus, but then that would leave the Celtics without a two-way backup wing.
Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 12,626
And1: 9,539
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#36 » by Triple7 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:49 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:Also, imo, richardson is a capable point guard.

So there is that.

His best season ever was in Miami when he was the defacto PG.


I would play Josh with the Jays, grant and R.will to finish games. Smart should just be the 6th man, and ride the bench in the closing minutes. Josh and JT can alternate bringing the ball up to finish the game.
Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 12,626
And1: 9,539
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#37 » by Triple7 » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:55 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:
Triple7 wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:I am not completely sold that we have to have a PG

Smart has been doing quite well when he actually is at the PG spot as opposed to player SG beside Schroder

Yeah, he is shooting poorly, but when he is the PG he focuses far more on driving the lane (and he is finishing) and moving the ball. Cannot really complain about that when you have a team with 2 25+ppg scorers and a center who loves to move the ball.

I believe we are far better served with a wing who can shoot and pass. McColum, Hayward, BRogdon would be perfect.


Come on man! I know you really love Smart. It shows because i haven’t seen you include Smart in any of your trade scenarios lol. Seriously, Smart have been our weakness at the last 2mins of a close game, that other teams constantly takes advantage. His lack of shooting really kills us, apart from really head scratching decisions he’s made as a point guard. We are better off having a player inside that can shoot and score to finish games. We need a true point guard if we can find one, or get a decent shooting point guard. Smart should just go or be a 6th man. That should be his role.



I dont disagree with you.

But again, right now the biggest issue is shooting.

And without trading a jay I dont think its possible to find a better pg than smart


I agree shooting is the biggest issue, that’s why smart needs to ride the bench on closing minutes of a close game.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,696
And1: 6,063
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#38 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 12, 2022 4:58 pm

Triple7 wrote:
Larry_Russell wrote:
Triple7 wrote:
Come on man! I know you really love Smart. It shows because i haven’t seen you include Smart in any of your trade scenarios lol. Seriously, Smart have been our weakness at the last 2mins of a close game, that other teams constantly takes advantage. His lack of shooting really kills us, apart from really head scratching decisions he’s made as a point guard. We are better off having a player inside that can shoot and score to finish games. We need a true point guard if we can find one, or get a decent shooting point guard. Smart should just go or be a 6th man. That should be his role.



I dont disagree with you.

But again, right now the biggest issue is shooting.

And without trading a jay I dont think its possible to find a better pg than smart


I agree shooting is the biggest issue, that’s why smart needs to ride the bench on closing minutes of a close game.



Maybe, yeah

Smart shoots Corner threes well enough and has gotten much better at driving to the rim and finishing so it might be ok.

But SChroder and Horford AND timelord cannot all be out there.

With a 3rd shooter I think having Smart and TImelord out there for defense will not take away from what the team can do offensively.
Jammer
General Manager
Posts: 8,823
And1: 3,349
Joined: Mar 06, 2001
Contact:
 

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#39 » by Jammer » Fri Jan 14, 2022 3:24 am

Well, the real problem is poor drafting from 2011 thru 2014. Those four years were disasters, and the two first round picks after Jaylen Brown in 2016 may have been the two worst of all (no wait, Fab Melo in 2012 was the worst). If you were putting together a team of the best 12 players available TO THE CELTICS from 2011 forward, you wouldn't even be able to include any of the Celtics 1rst round picks from 2019 or 2020. That's how much talent was available.

i.e. Best 12 players from draft years 2011 thru 2018 that the Celtics could have drafted:

Center: Nikola Jokic (2014 #41), Rudy Gobert (2013 #27), Robert Williams III (2018 #27) - Celts took James Young, Kelly Olynk & Rob

PF: Jayson Tatum (2017 #3), Jae Crowder (2012 #34) - Celts took Tatum and Jared Sullinger

SF: Jimmy Butler (2011 #30), Khris Middleton (2012 #39) - Celts took Marshon Brooks and Fab Melo

SG: Zach LaVine (2014 #13), Jaylen Brown (2016 #3), Terry Rozier (2015 #16) - Celts took Marcus Smart, Brown and Rozier

PG: Dejounte Murray (2016 #29), Malcolm Brogdan (2016 #36) - Celts took Guershon Yabusele and Ante Zizic

List of Notable players passed on:

Marshon Brooks (2011 #25) was chosen over Jimmy Butler (2011 #30)

Jared Sullinger (2012 #21) & Fab Melo (2012 #22) were chosen over Khris Middleton (2012 #39) and Jae Crowder (2012 #34)

Kelly Olynyk (2013 #13) was chosen over Giannis Antetokounmpo (2013 #15) and Rudy Gobert (2013 #27)

Marcus Smart (2014 #6) and James Young (2014 #17) were chosen over:
Julius Randle - 2014 #7
Zach LaVine - 2014 #13
Jusuf Nurkic - 2014 #16
Clint Capela - 2014 #25
Bogdan Bogdanovic - 2014 #27
Joe Harris - 2014 #33
Spencer Dinwiddie - 2014 #38
Jerami Grant - 2014 #39
Nikola Jokic - 2014 #41
Jordan Clarkson - 2014 #46


R.J. Hunter (2015 #28) was chosen over:
Cedi Osman - 2015 #31
Norman Powell - 2015 #46

Guerschon Yabusele (2016 #16) & Ante Zizic (2016 #23) were chosen over:
Caris LeVert - 2016 #20
Pascal Siakam - 2016 #27
Dejounte Murray - 2016 #29
Ivica Zubac - 2016 # 32
Malcolm Brogdan - 2016 #36
User avatar
druggas
General Manager
Posts: 7,606
And1: 6,021
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: The Real Problem -- Lack of a True Point Guard 

Post#40 » by druggas » Fri Jan 14, 2022 4:01 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:I'm going to disagree with the whole premise here. (And with Cousy as well, who famously thought that Chauncey Billups would never be a championship PG.)

The Celtics are currently being coached to a Popovich/.5 system. No one distributor should or can control that.

And by the way, no recent repeat champion has been built around that kind of PG. No Phil Jackson team was built that way. That's not Popovich's model. That's not what Steph Curry does. It's not how the Heatles operated.

Not recent, but Magic Johnson says "Hi". And don't tell me CP3 wouldn't have been a huge upgrade and probably carried the Celts to at least the championship game.

Return to Boston Celtics