Ron Swanson wrote:Just like how I willed PJ Tucker into existence last season (you're welcome), I'm willing Naz Reid into existence now. Make it happen Horst.
What happened to manifesting Thad Young? I was starting to like that idea.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Ron Swanson wrote:Just like how I willed PJ Tucker into existence last season (you're welcome), I'm willing Naz Reid into existence now. Make it happen Horst.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
thonnisbeastley wrote:Barnes/Hield/Haliburton for Middleton/DDV/Nwora
Ron Swanson wrote:All this talk about Jrue and Middleton "aging/declining" in the next 1-2 years, yet you look around the league at the top contenders and the ages of their core guys....
PHX: Paul (36)
GS: Curry (33), Klay (31 on a bum knee), Dray (31)
BKN: Durant (33), Harden (32)
MIA: Butler (32), Lowry (35)
LAC: Kawhi (30 and on a bum knee), George (31 and may be out for the year)
Which one of those front offices seriously considers blowing up the core as soon as this offseason?
Ron Swanson wrote:I don't really get this obsession that people have with this idea that you need your Big-3 to all line up perfectly age-wise, especially when we have like, 50+ years of evidence that proves the old adage of veteran teams win championships. Jrue's arguably playing the best ball of his career right now. I mean, hell, these guys just turned 30 and 31 respectively. They're quite literally in the prime years of their careers still. Conversely, how many times has a 21-year old been the 2nd or 3rd best player on a championship team? ......Kobe? Basically that's the list?
Ron Swanson wrote:I don't really get this obsession that people have with this idea that you need your Big-3 to all line up perfectly age-wise, especially when we have like, 50+ years of evidence that proves the old adage of veteran teams win championships. Jrue's arguably playing the best ball of his career right now. I mean, hell, these guys just turned 30 and 31 respectively. They're quite literally in the prime years of their careers still. Conversely, how many times has a 21-year old been the 2nd or 3rd best player on a championship team? ......Kobe? Basically that's the list?
Ruben Quevedo wrote:Barnes/Halliburton for Middleton is an absolute no brainer. There's no way that's on the table though. And we would never do it anyway because of the politics involved.
DingleJerry wrote:Others I thought of. Kyrie would've been 22-24ish for those Finals runs and when they won it. Tony Parker was 21 for the first title and obviously just a few years old for the next ones.
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:DingleJerry wrote:Others I thought of. Kyrie would've been 22-24ish for those Finals runs and when they won it. Tony Parker was 21 for the first title and obviously just a few years old for the next ones.
KL was under 23 when he won FMVP, but he probably was 4th (?) best player on the team at the time. Though if we traded for someone like Haliburton, him being the 3rd to 4th best player is fine. We would be asking Giannis to do the heavy lifting like he has been.
Matches Malone wrote:What happened to manifesting Thad Young? I was starting to like that idea.
DingleJerry wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:DingleJerry wrote:Others I thought of. Kyrie would've been 22-24ish for those Finals runs and when they won it. Tony Parker was 21 for the first title and obviously just a few years old for the next ones.
KL was under 23 when he won FMVP, but he probably was 4th (?) best player on the team at the time. Though if we traded for someone like Haliburton, him being the 3rd to 4th best player is fine. We would be asking Giannis to do the heavy lifting like he has been.
4th? What is Delladova better than him? He'd be at worst case 3rd behind Love and most would say 2. We can argue advanced stuff and I'm generally a Kyrie 'hater' in terms of stuff like that, but most people would view him as the "#2 star" on that team after LBJ. Keep in mind the other comparable level of 'star' is Love who most would also say wasn't really thaaat good, overrated, etc, so it's tough and imo a big stretch to not call Kyrie the #2 guy.
Personally, I think JR Smith was way underrated on those teams but no way anyone is gonna say he's the number two or three.
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Milbucks96 wrote:DingleJerry wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:KL was under 23 when he won FMVP, but he probably was 4th (?) best player on the team at the time. Though if we traded for someone like Haliburton, him being the 3rd to 4th best player is fine. We would be asking Giannis to do the heavy lifting like he has been.
4th? What is Delladova better than him? He'd be at worst case 3rd behind Love and most would say 2. We can argue advanced stuff and I'm generally a Kyrie 'hater' in terms of stuff like that, but most people would view him as the "#2 star" on that team after LBJ. Keep in mind the other comparable level of 'star' is Love who most would also say wasn't really thaaat good, overrated, etc, so it's tough and imo a big stretch to not call Kyrie the #2 guy.
Personally, I think JR Smith was way underrated on those teams but no way anyone is gonna say he's the number two or three.
I think he’s talking about Kawhi
FlagsFlyForever wrote:Would Giannis even allow us to trade Middleton or Jrue?
TroyD92 wrote:Why would you even consider trading Jrue. He's been the 2nd best player on this team by a mile