Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
NatiboyB
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,080
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 15, 2013
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Almost every season in the NBA we see a team who usually catches fire in the playoffs or has a better than expected regular season record. It increases expectations forces coaches and players to be resigned keeps a GM in position longer etc.
But the next season they come right back to their normal level of production. The Hawks were that team. I’ve seen it happen with the Blazers, Hornets, Knicks, Celtics, Mavs, Pacers, Magic, 76ers, Raptors, Wizards, Kings in the past few seasons. I have a belief that my Cavs are that team this season.
But the next season they come right back to their normal level of production. The Hawks were that team. I’ve seen it happen with the Blazers, Hornets, Knicks, Celtics, Mavs, Pacers, Magic, 76ers, Raptors, Wizards, Kings in the past few seasons. I have a belief that my Cavs are that team this season.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- Pachinko_
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,693
- And1: 23,985
- Joined: Jun 13, 2016
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
We're blaming the Hawks D entirely on Trae, but I think Bogdanovic also has a big share of responsibility. His D looks misleading because he does move fairly well and stays with his guy, and he has this massive wingspan, but he doesn't actually do much with it. Doesn't swipe, doesn't push, doesn't block the lane, he's pretty passive and soft and guys often go right through him. I think he gets targeted a lot when he's on the floor.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- DroseReturnChi
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,087
- And1: 3,144
- Joined: Feb 12, 2012
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
DaGawd wrote:They’ve definitely quit on McMillan.. kinda ironic cause they quit on Pierce before that.. they need to do some serious soul searching with the next coaching hire as well as make some roster moves
nah they quit bc they all got paid. heurter, collins. trade all the roster and retool.
also using hawks ecf record to prove trae is superior to doncic was one of the most unintellectual discussion.
Doncic will be goat. Lauri will be his sidekick.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- DroseReturnChi
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,087
- And1: 3,144
- Joined: Feb 12, 2012
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Floody100 wrote:MikeM wrote:They play 4 on 5 defensively. That's how they have a bottom 3 defence every year except last year. If you have bad defence, you usually are not good. Sometimes the answers are obvious.
It's a simple sport.
& that’s exactly why they’re losing. Trae’s offence doesn’t make up for for his atrocious defence.
You could legitimately make an argument for Trae being the worst NBA defender of all time.
trae is steph 2.0. but a more consistent version because he doesnt gamble on 3s and gets 10 assists and at least 20pts a night.
not a concidence hawks fo are from gs and trying to imitate how they hid steph behind green. but finding one is tough trae will not win a ring without green's caliber. shows how lucky steph is.
Doncic will be goat. Lauri will be his sidekick.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
chrismikayla
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 2,989
- Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Pachinko_ wrote:We're blaming the Hawks D entirely on Trae, but I think Bogdanovic also has a big share of responsibility. His D looks misleading because he does move fairly well and stays with his guy, and he has this massive wingspan, but he doesn't actually do much with it. Doesn't swipe, doesn't push, doesn't block the lane, he's pretty passive and soft and guys often go right through him. I think he gets targeted a lot when he's on the floor.
There are a lot of turnstiles on defense with the Hawks from the starters to the bench.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
[gfycat][/gfycat]
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
NDaATL
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,837
- And1: 625
- Joined: Nov 08, 2004
- Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Pachinko_ wrote:We're blaming the Hawks D entirely on Trae, but I think Bogdanovic also has a big share of responsibility. His D looks misleading because he does move fairly well and stays with his guy, and he has this massive wingspan, but he doesn't actually do much with it. Doesn't swipe, doesn't push, doesn't block the lane, he's pretty passive and soft and guys often go right through him. I think he gets targeted a lot when he's on the floor.
Bogi is awful on defense, this isn't just a this season thing, he plays with his hands down and lets guys go right by him. Pretty much everyone on the team outside of Capela, Okongwu and Hunter are awful defenders. And Hunter/Okongwu have both missed more than half the season. Trae isn't great either but he's not historically bad as some make him out to be. We can generally hide him on the opposing teams worst backcourt offensive player. The problem is our other players are crappy defenders too so it doesn't really make a difference.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- NYKnickerbocker
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,848
- And1: 14,252
- Joined: Oct 10, 2012
- Location: Queens
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
its not really gambling If you smacking them at a 43% clip like Steph has for his career lol. Trae hasn’t come close to sniffing 40 for a seasonDroseReturnChi wrote:Floody100 wrote:MikeM wrote:They play 4 on 5 defensively. That's how they have a bottom 3 defence every year except last year. If you have bad defence, you usually are not good. Sometimes the answers are obvious.
It's a simple sport.
& that’s exactly why they’re losing. Trae’s offence doesn’t make up for for his atrocious defence.
You could legitimately make an argument for Trae being the worst NBA defender of all time.
trae is steph 2.0. but a more consistent version because he doesnt gamble on 3s and gets 10 assists and at least 20pts a night.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
chrismikayla
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 2,989
- Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Also last year Capela was super awesome on defense and covering up for the awful perimeter defenders. When he’s active and one hundred percent the Hawks are a much better team. I don’t think he’s been 100 percent but a handful of games. When the Hawks were on a winning streak earlier in the year CC looked like his old self. For a good example check out the close out game against the Knicks. He absolutely dominated and altered so many shots it was ridiculous.
https://youtu.be/JTJH2oBhb_A
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
https://youtu.be/JTJH2oBhb_A
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
[gfycat][/gfycat]
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
CP War Hawks
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,425
- And1: 1,568
- Joined: Nov 28, 2017
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Hawks probably accelerated the process one year too early and could have tanked last season. Spending all that money on Bogi and Gallo wasn't ideal. The team doesn't have one 7 footer on the roster.
Cavs, Bulls, Wiz, and Tor all have taken a step or two up from last season. I have no doubt the Hawks will catch the 7-10 teams by years end but it's not worth it to get slaughtered in the 1st round vs positioning for a top 10 pick.
Cavs, Bulls, Wiz, and Tor all have taken a step or two up from last season. I have no doubt the Hawks will catch the 7-10 teams by years end but it's not worth it to get slaughtered in the 1st round vs positioning for a top 10 pick.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
CoachD
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 4,820
- Joined: Jul 14, 2009
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
NatiboyB wrote:Almost every season in the NBA we see a team who usually catches fire in the playoffs or has a better than expected regular season record. It increases expectations forces coaches and players to be resigned keeps a GM in position longer etc.
But the next season they come right back to their normal level of production. The Hawks were that team. I’ve seen it happen with the Blazers, Hornets, Knicks, Celtics, Mavs, Pacers, Magic, 76ers, Raptors, Wizards, Kings in the past few seasons. I have a belief that my Cavs are that team this season.
You can remove the Raptors from that list because that literally never happened to them.
Raps never had a single big over achieving season and then came back crashing down
Let's remember that without Kawhai they were the #2 team in the NBA prior to the nba shutdown

Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- Clyde Frazier
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 20,241
- And1: 26,118
- Joined: Sep 07, 2010
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Petty rivalry with the hawks aside, it's wild how many hawks fans want McMillan gone after they were gushing about him last season. Didn't realize that was a thing until a few days ago.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
Zenzibar
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,850
- And1: 9,504
- Joined: Jan 10, 2019
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Clyde Frazier wrote:Petty rivalry with the hawks aside, it's wild how many hawks fans want McMillan gone after they were gushing about him last season. Didn't realize that was a thing until a few days ago.
You thought we were the only ones with some drama queens on our board?
Stop All Genocides
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
Pelon chingon
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 6,627
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Pachinko_ wrote:We're blaming the Hawks D entirely on Trae, but I think Bogdanovic also has a big share of responsibility. His D looks misleading because he does move fairly well and stays with his guy, and he has this massive wingspan, but he doesn't actually do much with it. Doesn't swipe, doesn't push, doesn't block the lane, he's pretty passive and soft and guys often go right through him. I think he gets targeted a lot when he's on the floor.
That's why I didn't lose any sleep when McNair didn't match his salary (do to Vlade overpaying Buddy).
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
NatiboyB
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,080
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 15, 2013
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
CoachD wrote:NatiboyB wrote:Almost every season in the NBA we see a team who usually catches fire in the playoffs or has a better than expected regular season record. It increases expectations forces coaches and players to be resigned keeps a GM in position longer etc.
But the next season they come right back to their normal level of production. The Hawks were that team. I’ve seen it happen with the Blazers, Hornets, Knicks, Celtics, Mavs, Pacers, Magic, 76ers, Raptors, Wizards, Kings in the past few seasons. I have a belief that my Cavs are that team this season.
You can remove the Raptors from that list because that literally never happened to them.
Raps never had a single big over achieving season and then came back crashing down
Let's remember that without Kawhai they were the #2 team in the NBA prior to the nba shutdown
2009-2010
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
CoachD
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 4,820
- Joined: Jul 14, 2009
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
NatiboyB wrote:CoachD wrote:NatiboyB wrote:Almost every season in the NBA we see a team who usually catches fire in the playoffs or has a better than expected regular season record. It increases expectations forces coaches and players to be resigned keeps a GM in position longer etc.
But the next season they come right back to their normal level of production. The Hawks were that team. I’ve seen it happen with the Blazers, Hornets, Knicks, Celtics, Mavs, Pacers, Magic, 76ers, Raptors, Wizards, Kings in the past few seasons. I have a belief that my Cavs are that team this season.
You can remove the Raptors from that list because that literally never happened to them.
Raps never had a single big over achieving season and then came back crashing down
Let's remember that without Kawhai they were the #2 team in the NBA prior to the nba shutdown
2009-2010
huh? they were under .500

Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
ChuckChilly
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,432
- And1: 3,209
- Joined: Jun 30, 2011
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
I put a big chunk of this on Trae, but only about half of it. He needs to get smarter. Its like everything he does out there is on instinct, whether its scoring or passing. He doesn't think about the flow of the offense, shot selection, or making sure that his teammates gets touches to keep them interested on both ends of the court.
Unless we go the Iverson route, surrounding him with nothing but defensive players, I dont think we'll ever consistently win with him running the show. Not until he matures his game outside of what he already does best.
The other half of the blame goes on the team and the coach. There doesn't seem to be any kind of organized plan or sense of urgency going on. Maybe Hunter and Okongwu will help change that, but someone on the squad has to be willing to do the dirty work and be a spark on the defensive end.
Unless we go the Iverson route, surrounding him with nothing but defensive players, I dont think we'll ever consistently win with him running the show. Not until he matures his game outside of what he already does best.
The other half of the blame goes on the team and the coach. There doesn't seem to be any kind of organized plan or sense of urgency going on. Maybe Hunter and Okongwu will help change that, but someone on the squad has to be willing to do the dirty work and be a spark on the defensive end.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
The KnicksFix
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,769
- And1: 4,683
- Joined: Oct 28, 2011
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
Trae is fake hustle. Can’t launch yourself into defenders to draw fouls anymore. He doesn’t give anything to you on defense. On offense he would run pick and roll with Capela and stop on a dime to initiate fake fouls. You can’t do that anymore and he can’t launch himself into people trying to shoot from 35 feet out. Defense is a wash. They don’t guard anyone.
That hawk team is just not that good
That hawk team is just not that good
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
meekrab
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,964
- And1: 10,628
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
CoachD wrote:NatiboyB wrote:CoachD wrote:
You can remove the Raptors from that list because that literally never happened to them.
Raps never had a single big over achieving season and then came back crashing down
Let's remember that without Kawhai they were the #2 team in the NBA prior to the nba shutdown
2009-2010
huh? they were under .500
And Bosh left for the Heatles so even if 40 wins was "overachieving" you can't blame the guys who were left in 2011.
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
- God Squad
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,351
- And1: 11,594
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
The KnicksFix wrote:Trae is fake hustle. Can’t launch yourself into defenders to draw fouls anymore. He doesn’t give anything to you on defense. On offense he would run pick and roll with Capela and stop on a dime to initiate fake fouls. You can’t do that anymore and he can’t launch himself into people trying to shoot from 35 feet out. Defense is a wash. They don’t guard anyone.
That hawk team is just not that good
You sound Salty af. Then why couldn't the Knicks stop him or the hawks? TBH I thought both teams overachieved.

Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
-
BarryLird
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 883
- And1: 565
- Joined: Jan 19, 2013
- Location: NYC
-
Re: Hawks are 17-24. What's happening?
God Squad wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:Trae is fake hustle. Can’t launch yourself into defenders to draw fouls anymore. He doesn’t give anything to you on defense. On offense he would run pick and roll with Capela and stop on a dime to initiate fake fouls. You can’t do that anymore and he can’t launch himself into people trying to shoot from 35 feet out. Defense is a wash. They don’t guard anyone.
That hawk team is just not that good
You sound Salty af. Then why couldn't the Knicks stop him or the hawks? TBH I thought both teams overachieved.
Because with Robinson being injured we had nobody to stop Clint Capela who killed the Knicks in that series. Mitch would have shut their pick and roll down. Not saying the Knicks would have won the series, but Mitch being injured played a huge part.




