Curmudgeon wrote:
I have absolutely no doubt that this is what Kings' management told the Ringer. I also have absolutely no doubt that Kings' management was lying.
Yup.
That read as if it was transcribed off Kings' letterhead.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Curmudgeon wrote:
I have absolutely no doubt that this is what Kings' management told the Ringer. I also have absolutely no doubt that Kings' management was lying.
Curmudgeon wrote:
I have absolutely no doubt that this is what Kings' management told the Ringer. I also have absolutely no doubt that Kings' management was lying.
Curmudgeon wrote:BTW, I'd be willing to bet that the player Ainge wants to unload is Rudy Gobert. Look at that ridiculous contract. Horford and Smart for Gobert and Ingles is what Ainge would like to do. But then, what will the Celtics do with the Timelord? Makes no sense for Boston. The player who makes sense for Boston is Conley, and Ainge is asking for a pick in that exchange.
rob4748 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:
I have absolutely no doubt that this is what Kings' management told the Ringer. I also have absolutely no doubt that Kings' management was lying.
I really like Holmes as a backup big for the C's.
How about:
Horford
Langford or Nesmith
1st
for Holmes & Barnes.
fallguy wrote:Gobert could finally give Ime that three-big lineup you know he wants to roll out.
Larry_Russell wrote:fallguy wrote:Gobert could finally give Ime that three-big lineup you know he wants to roll out.
Schroder
Smart
Horford
Timelord
Gobert
Wet dream for Ime
The Comedian wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Question: Besides getting to play with his childhood buddy, what's the appeal for Beal in joining the Celtics in the summer?
The playing together aspect is big to them. Doesn’t mean Beal will 100% come here, but from everything I’ve heard, it’s either Washington, or here.
Plus, in theory that’s three all star level players. Or whatever we get for JB
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Not sure if this is credible at all, but Smart for Bogdanovic does make sense. Issue is he's 32 and we'd have to pay him after next year.
Larry_Russell wrote:fallguy wrote:Gobert could finally give Ime that three-big lineup you know he wants to roll out.
Schroder
Smart
Horford
Timelord
Gobert
Wet dream for Ime
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Not sure if this is credible at all, but Smart for Bogdanovic does make sense. Issue is he's 32 and we'd have to pay him after next year.
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Not sure if this is credible at all, but Smart for Bogdanovic does make sense. Issue is he's 32 and we'd have to pay him after next year.
NuckyPowell wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:
Not sure if this is credible at all, but Smart for Bogdanovic does make sense. Issue is he's 32 and we'd have to pay him after next year.
Yeah, 33 in April. Can't see why we'd be throwing in a couple of seconds.
greenroom31 wrote:NuckyPowell wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:
Not sure if this is credible at all, but Smart for Bogdanovic does make sense. Issue is he's 32 and we'd have to pay him after next year.
Yeah, 33 in April. Can't see why we'd be throwing in a couple of seconds.
Probably because Smart is owed $77M over the next 4 years and Bogdanovic is $20M/1 year?
I would be surprised if we left ourselves with only Pritchard as a true PG on the roster, but who knows?
GoCeltics123 wrote:The Comedian wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Question: Besides getting to play with his childhood buddy, what's the appeal for Beal in joining the Celtics in the summer?
The playing together aspect is big to them. Doesn’t mean Beal will 100% come here, but from everything I’ve heard, it’s either Washington, or here.
Plus, in theory that’s three all star level players. Or whatever we get for JB
Going to come down to a few things here imo:
1. Will the Wizards offer the supermax? We've all agreed, hell Wiz fans agree, that they shouldn't pay him a supermax. It'd be **** stupid. Listening to Beal on the pod today, it almost struck me as the GM Sheppard doesn't want to do it, but the owner does.
2. How much will the Wizards invest in the team? They've been rumored for Sabonis and Grant. Let's say Sabonis isn't moved, they definitely have the assets to get Grant but are they willing to pay him $25+ million a season for 4 years? Also, I believe their first this year is controlled by the Rockets b/c of the Wall deal, so are they willing to move another one to invest in a treadmill team? With most teams I think they'd say no, but it's the Wizards, who've been mediocre pretty much our whole lives at this point.
3. Where do the Wizards finish? If they're out in the play-in, lose in Round 1 or even miss the playoffs, will that sway Bea's decision?
IMO, this is the Kemba in Charlotte situation all over again; they should move on. But they seem willing to pay him a supermax.
NuckyPowell wrote:greenroom31 wrote:NuckyPowell wrote:Yeah, 33 in April. Can't see why we'd be throwing in a couple of seconds.
Probably because Smart is owed $77M over the next 4 years and Bogdanovic is $20M/1 year?
I would be surprised if we left ourselves with only Pritchard as a true PG on the roster, but who knows?
I guess, if you regard Smart's contract as a negative. With the way salaries go up every year, I don't really think it will be regarded badly, personally.