JB7 wrote:I don't understand that fascination with players like LeVert or Hield.
With the way the Raptors current roster is constructed, they already have 5 core players covering the 4 positions outside of C. With those 5 (FVV, PS, OG, GTJ, & Barnes) averaging at least 36mins a game (which you would want for core players who are young), that only leaves 12mins a game for another player. Bringing in someone like LeVert or Hield who would expect mins and shots does not make a lot of sense, as they will just be taking those minutes and shots from one of the core 5 on the team that are better off getting them in terms of development. So unless the team is looking to move one of the core 5 (which at this point I don't think they are really considering), why bring in a vet that will negatively effect that young core 5. With those remaining 12mins they are better off trying to develop someone like Banton who fits in perfectly with what the team is trying to build (long defenders who can handle the ball and have a decent shot). Until Banton is ready, players like Boucher, Yuta or Svi can play those minutes.
The obvious weak spot on this team is C. Birch is a decent back-up option at 12-16mins a game (low cost) for now. Is Achiuwa the answer for the future. Athletically he is great. With his mobility and size he can cover a ton of ground. But can he develop his offensive game enough that he can justify the starting role and minutes, and will he develop quickly enough for this team's timeline.
That's why, if Poeltl is actually available, he makes the most logical sense in trying to work out a deal. Otherwise, they probably are just looking to see if they can turn Dragic into a pick or extra salary room.
Yup, this is why the purpose is about trading minutes (playing time). I think people put too much focus on trading players, having 15 players with starter quality, but the reality is that only half of them play.
When looking at the bench minutes, we are also giving the minutes to Achiuwa, Boucher, Birch, Champagnie, where all these are C, PF or SF with length and rebounding ability, so trading a PG or SG seems to be less of our interest.