Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Larry_Russell wrote:
Been looking at Kings fans posts, we dont have enough talent to be able to get any of their guys.
playa-hater wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Jerami Grant giving the Pistons a list of teams he wants to go to is funny.
Who do he think he is? A star? Lol
are we on that list??
GoCeltics123 wrote:The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:
Wonder who the teams are though.
Lakers
Clippers
Miami.
Brooklyn
New York.
The usual teams that every single person wants to play for
Lol fair.
Apparently he wants to be a #1 or #2 option though so those teams will probably pass on him. And apparently a 4 year $112 million extension (yikes). I can totally see the Wizards for him
Curmudgeon wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:
Been looking at Kings fans posts, we dont have enough talent to be able to get any of their guys.
LOL, I hope you are being facetious. When Boogie was in Sacramento, Kings fans expected to get the world's fair for him. Then they traded him for Buddy Hield.
The Kings have so much talent that they are 18-30.
It's very weird you make stuff up man.Larry_Russell wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:
Been looking at Kings fans posts, we dont have enough talent to be able to get any of their guys.
LOL, I hope you are being facetious. When Boogie was in Sacramento, Kings fans expected to get the world's fair for him. Then they traded him for Buddy Hield.
The Kings have so much talent that they are 18-30.
I was told just today that the only way Boston could ever get Donovan Mitchell was to trade them Brown or Tatum. He is a star you know, just is buried behind 2 even bigger stars in Fox and Hield.
And Buddy is not a 1 dimensional malcontent on a grossly overpaid salary.
RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's very weird you make stuff up man.Larry_Russell wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:
LOL, I hope you are being facetious. When Boogie was in Sacramento, Kings fans expected to get the world's fair for him. Then they traded him for Buddy Hield.
The Kings have so much talent that they are 18-30.
I was told just today that the only way Boston could ever get Donovan Mitchell was to trade them Brown or Tatum. He is a star you know, just is buried behind 2 even bigger stars in Fox and Hield.
And Buddy is not a 1 dimensional malcontent on a grossly overpaid salary.
This is what the poster told you.
"Mitchell is operating as a third PG, because the Kings have Fox and Hali in front of him. Not because of ability. When your fellow Celts fans are telling you that your trades are completely biased that should tell you something. There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
You come to our board offering Schroder and horford for mitchell and wonder why kings fans say its not enough.
Sorry nobody wants the vets you are trying to dump man. At least be honest about the conversation.
Obviously this poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown, just that nothing else is of interest.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
Hahahaha love the post man.celtics543 wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's very weird you make stuff up man.Larry_Russell wrote:
I was told just today that the only way Boston could ever get Donovan Mitchell was to trade them Brown or Tatum. He is a star you know, just is buried behind 2 even bigger stars in Fox and Hield.
And Buddy is not a 1 dimensional malcontent on a grossly overpaid salary.
This is what the poster told you.
"Mitchell is operating as a third PG, because the Kings have Fox and Hali in front of him. Not because of ability. When your fellow Celts fans are telling you that your trades are completely biased that should tell you something. There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
You come to our board offering Schroder and horford for mitchell and wonder why kings fans say its not enough.
Sorry nobody wants the vets you are trying to dump man. At least be honest about the conversation.
Obviously this poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown, just that nothing else is of interest.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
Man, you Kings fans are delusional with trade demands....
Okay guys now let's get back to figuring out how many picks Philly has to throw in when we trade them Sam Hauser and Romeo Langford for Ben Simmons.
Honestly, every fan base overrates their own guys and is always slightly disappointed when they get traded and they see what they're worth.
RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's very weird you make stuff up man.Larry_Russell wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:
LOL, I hope you are being facetious. When Boogie was in Sacramento, Kings fans expected to get the world's fair for him. Then they traded him for Buddy Hield.
The Kings have so much talent that they are 18-30.
I was told just today that the only way Boston could ever get Donovan Mitchell was to trade them Brown or Tatum. He is a star you know, just is buried behind 2 even bigger stars in Fox and Hield.
And Buddy is not a 1 dimensional malcontent on a grossly overpaid salary.
This is what the poster told you.
"Mitchell is operating as a third PG, because the Kings have Fox and Hali in front of him. Not because of ability. When your fellow Celts fans are telling you that your trades are completely biased that should tell you something. There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
You come to our board offering Schroder and horford for mitchell and wonder why kings fans say its not enough.
Sorry nobody wants the vets you are trying to dump man. At least be honest about the conversation.
Obviously this poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown, just that nothing else is of interest.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
celtics543 wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's very weird you make stuff up man.Larry_Russell wrote:
I was told just today that the only way Boston could ever get Donovan Mitchell was to trade them Brown or Tatum. He is a star you know, just is buried behind 2 even bigger stars in Fox and Hield.
And Buddy is not a 1 dimensional malcontent on a grossly overpaid salary.
This is what the poster told you.
"Mitchell is operating as a third PG, because the Kings have Fox and Hali in front of him. Not because of ability. When your fellow Celts fans are telling you that your trades are completely biased that should tell you something. There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
You come to our board offering Schroder and horford for mitchell and wonder why kings fans say its not enough.
Sorry nobody wants the vets you are trying to dump man. At least be honest about the conversation.
Obviously this poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown, just that nothing else is of interest.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
Man, you Kings fans are delusional with trade demands....
Okay guys now let's get back to figuring out how many picks Philly has to throw in when we trade them Sam Hauser and Romeo Langford for Ben Simmons.
Honestly, every fan base overrates their own guys and is always slightly disappointed when they get traded and they see what they're worth.
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Hahahaha love the post man.celtics543 wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's very weird you make stuff up man.
This is what the poster told you.
"Mitchell is operating as a third PG, because the Kings have Fox and Hali in front of him. Not because of ability. When your fellow Celts fans are telling you that your trades are completely biased that should tell you something. There is no path to a trade with the Kings for any of the Kings young players unless Brown or Tatum is coming back."
You come to our board offering Schroder and horford for mitchell and wonder why kings fans say its not enough.
Sorry nobody wants the vets you are trying to dump man. At least be honest about the conversation.
Obviously this poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown, just that nothing else is of interest.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
Man, you Kings fans are delusional with trade demands....
Okay guys now let's get back to figuring out how many picks Philly has to throw in when we trade them Sam Hauser and Romeo Langford for Ben Simmons.
Honestly, every fan base overrates their own guys and is always slightly disappointed when they get traded and they see what they're worth.
Agree with that for sure.
I know this Kings poster wasn't saying mitchell is worth brown. Just that sac sucks, why on earth would we be trading our top 10 pick rookie for al horford and Schroder. I mean come on. If we are trading 1 of Fox, mitchell, Hali, we would want an upgrade not meh vets.
Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
ddb wrote:Memphis: Marcus Smart for Tyus Jones & Tyrell Terry.
I don't mind this trade for Boston. Tyus Jones is a good player. Natural PG. Pretty good defender and a really steady PG. Ideally, a backup PG, but I think he could start for Boston for the remainder of the season. Terry is a young player, major upside as a shooter. Take a chance on him even though he hasn't proven anything yet...still only 21 and in his 2nd season.
Dallas: Marcus Smart for Kleber & Burke. I don't like this deal for Boston at all.
Lakers: Marcus Smart/Langford for Horton-Tucker/Nunn. Sure why not. Especially if Horton-Tucker has the upside people seem to think he has.
Bulls: Smart & Nesmith for White & Jones Jr. I sorta like this trade for Boston. Coby White is going to end up being a really good 6th man. But he could start for now and have an opportunity to play with the Js. He's more of a scorer, but this season should be all about building value. Jones Jr would be a FUN 4....Having him fly around would be impactful..
Suns: Smart for Cam Payne & Jalen Smith. Not sure I like this for Boston.
Utah: Smart for Ingles & a 1st rd pick. Not sure I like it for Boston. Or Smart/Schroder for Bogdanovic. Weirdly, I love this for Boston...the 2nd trade. I've always liked Bogdanovic. 6'7, 18ppg. 40% from 3. Handles pretty well and would take A LOT of pressure off the J's. Easy to flip this offseason if it doesn't work out, or as part of a bigger trade (Beal).
Denver: Smart/Bruno for Morris/NNaji/Campazzo. Sign me up.
Andrew McCeltic wrote:ddb wrote:Memphis: Marcus Smart for Tyus Jones & Tyrell Terry.
I don't mind this trade for Boston. Tyus Jones is a good player. Natural PG. Pretty good defender and a really steady PG. Ideally, a backup PG, but I think he could start for Boston for the remainder of the season. Terry is a young player, major upside as a shooter. Take a chance on him even though he hasn't proven anything yet...still only 21 and in his 2nd season.
Dallas: Marcus Smart for Kleber & Burke. I don't like this deal for Boston at all.
Lakers: Marcus Smart/Langford for Horton-Tucker/Nunn. Sure why not. Especially if Horton-Tucker has the upside people seem to think he has.
Bulls: Smart & Nesmith for White & Jones Jr. I sorta like this trade for Boston. Coby White is going to end up being a really good 6th man. But he could start for now and have an opportunity to play with the Js. He's more of a scorer, but this season should be all about building value. Jones Jr would be a FUN 4....Having him fly around would be impactful..
Suns: Smart for Cam Payne & Jalen Smith. Not sure I like this for Boston.
Utah: Smart for Ingles & a 1st rd pick. Not sure I like it for Boston. Or Smart/Schroder for Bogdanovic. Weirdly, I love this for Boston...the 2nd trade. I've always liked Bogdanovic. 6'7, 18ppg. 40% from 3. Handles pretty well and would take A LOT of pressure off the J's. Easy to flip this offseason if it doesn't work out, or as part of a bigger trade (Beal).
Denver: Smart/Bruno for Morris/NNaji/Campazzo. Sign me up.
THT and White are the only interesting ones and you wouldn't need to include Romeo or Aaron. Dallas could probably get you Kleber and Brunson. The rest of the deals are below Smart's value. Why move an all-defense point guard for a backup?
The Comedian wrote:I posted and deleted yesterday that I had heard that Harden doesn’t want to stay with the Nets long term, and that he apparently wants Philly. This came our today, and our old friend Kyrie plays a big part in it.
?s=20
GoGreen wrote:Is Brunson a realistic get for Smart? Seems like Mavs fans don't like that idea at all. Not to mention, they need shooting, too. If that's the case, not sure what the discussions are centered around. Hopefully not THJ.
bisme37 wrote:The Comedian wrote:I posted and deleted yesterday that I had heard that Harden doesn’t want to stay with the Nets long term, and that he apparently wants Philly. This came our today, and our old friend Kyrie plays a big part in it.
?s=20
I'm telling y'all. Durant to Boston after Ky and Harden blow the Nets up.
bisme37 wrote:The Comedian wrote:I posted and deleted yesterday that I had heard that Harden doesn’t want to stay with the Nets long term, and that he apparently wants Philly. This came our today, and our old friend Kyrie plays a big part in it.
?s=20
I'm telling y'all. Durant to Boston after Ky and Harden blow the Nets up.
bisme37 wrote:GoGreen wrote:Is Brunson a realistic get for Smart? Seems like Mavs fans don't like that idea at all. Not to mention, they need shooting, too. If that's the case, not sure what the discussions are centered around. Hopefully not THJ.
Smart is better than Brunson. It's just Mavs fans don't know that and they love Brunson.