Hal14 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Hal14 wrote:I'm onboard with this trade. Collins is a legit no. 3 option. Hell, he was the no. 2 option on a team that went to game 7 of the ECF last yr. Collins fits the timeline with tatum/brown/rob perfectly. Collins is tough, physical, he's big and he can shoot.
Collins and Bogdanovic are both good shooters.
Your new rotation post-trade seems off, though. Richardson is not a PG. If we do this, Schroder is the starting PG (as he has been all season for us when Smart has been out) and Pritchard backs up Schroder. Bogdanovic and Richardson give us 2 really good wings coming off the bench, which means Nesmith is out of the rotation..
All in all, I like it. But as others have said, not sure ATL would do it.
Schroder doesnt stay anywhere near this team.
ok well i'm just going off the trade proposal that you posted. in it, smart gets traded but schroder does not.
if schroder is traded in a separate deal, well then what is that other deal? who are we getting? who else are we moving? we would need answers to those questions to determine what the post-deadline rotation may look like. but simply posting the hawks trade (which doesn't include schroder), posting no other trade that does involve schroder, yet leaving schroder out of your post-deadline celtics rotations seems weird.
Schroder for capspace and picks(2nds)
Pg either comes organically or offseason deal or maybe even tpe.
Richardson/pritchard/yam might be perfect too but I feel that PG is now the deepest position in the nba


















