Scoot McGroot wrote:Ell Curry wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
Seems like the kind of offer that a Indy would be able to get around the draft. Really no need for Indy to jump into the luxury tax to do (just Turner for Dragic gets into the tax…adding Flynn for any minimum guy just makes it worse fiscally). Your other options are just kind of making it worse, too.
Oh yeah, if they do this they're definitely getting under the tax in another deal (or this one, maybe OKC gets something or another team under the cap), presumably by moving Craig or Holliday.
I could see Indiana wanting Flynn just because Indy doesn't have one and he might develop into a nice cheap young backup for Brogdon or whoever they eventually end up with starting there in time. Sykes doesn't seem like he's gonna be that guy.
We also have McConnell, who should return in February/March. But no, I don’t see them making a poor value deal now, to get into the tax, and force themselves to make a poor value deal asap to undo the damage of this one. Just don’t consider this one, and they’re in a better spot.
Could be. The only issue is that if the team trading for Turner isn't 90% sure they can extend him (and his max is 70/3 so and it doesn't seem crazy that he might want to see if he can get 80/3 with a player option on the 4th year on the market for example) then Turner's value goes from 2 playoffs to 1 and so presumably drops down closer to 1 lotto protected first alone.



































