OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Should they get in?

Yes
103
71%
No
43
29%
 
Total votes: 146

DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,177
And1: 6,908
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#41 » by DirtyDez » Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:42 am

slicedbread2 wrote:
shakes0 wrote:Absolutely not. They wouldn’t have been nearly as good if they weren’t juicing. And they took away from the guys who didn’t cheat. I grew up a White Sox fan and we had Frank Thomas who was completely clean and still put up amazing numbers. I always wondered just how much higher he would’ve been in the record books if he didn’t have to compete vs juicers.

Screw Bonds and Clemens. they were good enough to still be great if they didn’t cheat.


If Frank Thomas didn't get injured at the worst times of his career he could've easily topped 600 home runs. The fact that he voluntarily submitted urine samples to show that he was clean makes it even better. He was known to be vocal about his opposition to steroids as well where he had advocated for drug testing as early as 1995 and was the only player who agreed to be interviewed for the Mitchell report in 2007.

It's sad that Bonds didn't take Ken Griffey Jr.'s advice in ignoring the hoopla and to just let his play do the talking. If he had laid off the steroids he could've been the 1st ever player to have 500hrs, 500sbs and potentially 3,000 hits not to mention all the other accolades he accomplished, but greed got to him in the end. Griffey was truly special and it's a shame injuries ruined him, but still impressed he got 600hrs nonetheless.

As a Blue Jays fan I wish Roy Halladay(RIP) could've had a Blue Jays cap on his HOF plaque, but still happy he got in regardless. Hate Alomar though especially for what he did(sexually harassed an 18 y/o staffer in 2014) which resulted in the Blue Jays+MLB severing ties with him.


Steroid testing didn’t start until 2003 and amphetamines weren’t banned until 2006. Nobody really knows how many players used this stuff while MLB/Selig turned a blind eye then got all righteous when Canseco wrote his book.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,950
And1: 16,972
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#42 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:44 am

Ortiz was busted in 03, but because he was a writers dream and incredibly liked he's in. What an unbelievable shame.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#43 » by Marty McFly » Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:44 am

tragic. Bonds is the greatest hitter the game has ever seen. but then again the Hall's credibility isn't great in the first place.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,841
And1: 19,334
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#44 » by Pharmcat » Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:53 am

Marty McFly wrote:tragic. Bonds is the greatest hitter the game has ever seen. but then again the Hall's credibility isn't great in the first place.


This post sums it up , bonds hand eye coordination was best ever
Image
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,841
And1: 19,334
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#45 » by Pharmcat » Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:55 am

jokeboy86 wrote:Of course they should but its an absolute joke that they penalize them but Ortiz gets it. But let's be real, this is about that some writers and the media don't like Clemens and none of them I repeat none of them ever liked Bonds period. If you think the media hates dealing with Belichick, Lynch, Irving multiply that by a 1000 of what they thought of Bonds. To a lot of them this is Bonds's comeuppance. They also feel that somebody having to do with emergence of the Red Sox other than Martinez has to make the Hall buts its a joke that Ortiz even made it over Ramirez. It stinks.



To be fair bonds was an arrogant <insert bad word> to a lot of people around him. I’m not surprised a lot of people hate him
Image
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#46 » by shakes0 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:10 am

azcatz11 wrote:
shakes0 wrote:Absolutely not. They wouldn’t have been nearly as good if they weren’t juicing. And they took away from the guys who didn’t cheat. I grew up a White Sox fan and we had Frank Thomas who was completely clean and still put up amazing numbers. I always wondered just how much higher he would’ve been in the record books if he didn’t have to compete vs juicers.

Screw Bonds and Clemens. they were good enough to still be great if they didn’t cheat.


With all due respect, Shakes, how do you know he was clean?



Frank was far and away the most vocal player back then in terms of guys speaking out against steroids. If there’s one guy who didn’t juice back then it was definitely Frank Thomas.
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#47 » by shakes0 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:15 am

Marty McFly wrote:tragic. Bonds is the greatest hitter the game has ever seen. but then again the Hall's credibility isn't great in the first place.



He wasn’t even the best hitter of his era. Frank Thomas was a better hitter and when comparing the two you absolutely have to put an asterisk next to Bonds since Frank was 100% clean.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,255
And1: 8,613
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#48 » by SNPA » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:23 am

What about guys having eye surgeries? Isn’t that a competitive advantage too?
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#49 » by Marty McFly » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:27 am

shakes0 wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:tragic. Bonds is the greatest hitter the game has ever seen. but then again the Hall's credibility isn't great in the first place.



He wasn’t even the best hitter of his era. Frank Thomas was a better hitter and when comparing the two you absolutely have to put an asterisk next to Bonds since Frank was 100% clean.


You're argument is conditional on the basis of your fandom. Pre-juice Bonds and Frank Thomas had comparable numbers, so to flat-out say Bonds wasn't even the best hitter in his era, whilst adding an asterisk to his juicing era shows an argument in bad faith.

all of these guys did something for a competitive advantage. Whether they were caught or not. Never mind the fact that Thomas was just a bigger man. he had that advantage.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
bebopdeluxe
RealGM
Posts: 10,996
And1: 4,009
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
Location: philly

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#50 » by bebopdeluxe » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:34 am

Build a "Cheaters Wing" for them in Cooperstown. While they are at it, the can put Papi's bust in there as well.

People want to turn a blind eye to an era where some guy name Brady Anderson hit FIFTY jacks in a year. The year before he had 16, and the year after, he had 18. Either he signed a new contract after he hit 50 or he lost his dealer.

NO DRUGGIES ALLOWED

And if you talk about "greenies", I will tell you that "greenies" weren't going to help f'n BRADY ANDERSON hit 50 bombs. The argument is harder when it comes to all of those guys during the first half of the 20th century who didn't have to play against black players. That is a more reasonable point.

And I have particular scorn for guys like Bonds and Clemons. While I do not approve of steroid use, and I think it made a mockery of the game, I can almost understand some AAAA-type player who was trying to secure a big-league paycheck. Bonds and Clemons were likely first-ballot guys WHO CHEATED ANYWAY.

Those guys can be like me - and buy a ticket to go there.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,199
And1: 16,675
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#51 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:35 am

slicedbread2 wrote:It's sad that Bonds didn't take Ken Griffey Jr.'s advice in ignoring the hoopla and to just let his play do the talking. If he had laid off the steroids he could've been the 1st ever player to have 500hrs, 500sbs and potentially 3,000 hits not to mention all the other accolades he accomplished, but greed got to him in the end. Griffey was truly special and it's a shame injuries ruined him, but still impressed he got 600hrs nonetheless.

The true goat.

People talk about Bonds. But Griff was a better all around player in his prime. He would have shattered every record if it wasn't for injuries which halted his career. Ken would hold the record (HR King), not Barry.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
uraverage
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,390
And1: 574
Joined: Jun 11, 2015
 

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#52 » by uraverage » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:47 am

Yet Bobby B is the only one still getting paid!!! Checkers vs chess
zshawn10
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,404
And1: 5,618
Joined: Jul 27, 2015
       

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#53 » by zshawn10 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:49 am

thebigbird wrote:It’s a joke. Baseball players throughout history did all kinds of sketchy, out of bounds things to gain advantages. Bonds is the best baseball player ever. He’d get one good pitch a night, at most, and knock it out of the park. Baseball is a dying game and the stuffy pearl clutchers will just make it die sooner.


Yet people think the Astros cheating was the first time anyone has ever cheated or stole signs. It was so weird
Peja Stojakovic
Starter
Posts: 2,181
And1: 2,944
Joined: Nov 17, 2014
 

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#54 » by Peja Stojakovic » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:52 am

i'm pretty sure they'll get in someday. even a couple generations from now people will think about sports and ped's pretty differently
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,199
And1: 16,675
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#55 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:54 am

azcatz11 wrote:Do you think they should've gotten in?

This was their last (10th) year of eligibility so they're shut out permanently I believe. Sosa missed out also.

David Ortiz made it and was the only person inducted this year

I'm of the belief that 80-95% of players we're using PED's during that era. So yes, they should get in.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,532
And1: 35,185
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#56 » by azcatz11 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:02 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Do you think they should've gotten in?

This was their last (10th) year of eligibility so they're shut out permanently I believe. Sosa missed out also.

David Ortiz made it and was the only person inducted this year

I'm of the belief that 80-95% of players we're using PED's during that era. So yes, they should get in.


I couldn't agree more. #LetThemIn
Praying for Burrow
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,125
And1: 61,976
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#57 » by Raps in 4 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:06 am

Allowing Ortiz in but not Bonds and Clemens is comical.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,125
And1: 61,976
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#58 » by Raps in 4 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:09 am

shakes0 wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:tragic. Bonds is the greatest hitter the game has ever seen. but then again the Hall's credibility isn't great in the first place.



He wasn’t even the best hitter of his era. Frank Thomas was a better hitter and when comparing the two you absolutely have to put an asterisk next to Bonds since Frank was 100% clean.


Frank doesn't pass the "100% clean" eye test for me, and I loved him as a player. I'd be shocked if he wasn't juicing too.

But anyway, Bonds was the better player, and it isn't close.

Bonds:
Career fWAR: 164.4
Career wRC+: 173

Thomas:
Career fWAR: 72.1
Career wRC+: 154

Frank Thomas had an all-time great career. Bonds had a case for GOAT.
gp2015
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 11,298
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Location: Toronto
     

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#59 » by gp2015 » Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:13 am

If you allow guys like Bonds and Clemens, then you would have to let those other guys in who were denied due to drug scandals as well. Guys like Sosa, McGwire, Palmeiro, Manny Ramirez should all be in the HOF based solely on their stats. You would have to let in Alex Rodriguez as well, who was caught twice and who probably won't get in based on initial voting.

Where do you draw the line?

It's a tough situation but it opens up a can of worms if you let them in.
"I'm doing what I love to do. So if I can never walk again because of what I love to do, that's a chance I'll take. I'll die on the court." - Alvin Williams
theoilslick
Senior
Posts: 531
And1: 267
Joined: May 01, 2006

Re: OT: Bonds & Clemens Miss HOF 

Post#60 » by theoilslick » Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:15 am

Long ago I loved watching Bonds hit his 73 home runs. And I watching him hit many of them live on TV in that record-breaking season.

When the BALCO scandal broke open, and anabolic steroids were connected to Bonds, my faith for guy was damaged. His charge in perjury case only worsened my respect for him at the time. I idolized what he was as a batter, and it shattered my love for him.

But as corrupt and filthy the steroids era was, ruining the image of many MLB big sluggers and pitchers, we can’t fairly erase or asterisk the top records to the all-stars, but let the records to other steroid era players count because they were not caught.

The steroid use was extremely popular even after 1991 when the MLB declared it as a banned substance list. It took until 2003 when the MLB thought, “Huh, maybe we should actually check for steroids use?”

Bottom line: it was really the MLB’s fault for not taking procedural steroid tests that let the drug wildly used. Hence why Bonds and Clemens should be allowed to be deemed HOFers. There are many of the pre-2003 HOFers who may have taken the ‘roids, but slipped right by. By no means is the steroid era a golden era.
Charlie Kelly: “I eat stickers all the time, dude!” IASiP

Return to The General Board