Roscoe Sheed wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Goner wrote:I appreciate the example, but the logic does not follow. You are arguing that because nonsurgical options did not work in this particular case that, therefore, nonsurgical options will not work in any case. That conclusion is completely unfounded. If it is the case, then clearly you know something that the team doctors of the Angels and Clippers, as well as the medical community writ large, do not, because if surgery was necessary following such an injury then both of the teams needlessly postponed the inevitable.
They don't work lol I'll repeat, the only way to repair an UCL is with Tommy John surgery.
You find me an example where someone who required Tommy John surgery was able to avoid UCL reconstruction surgery indefinitely with other means and measures to continue their career, then I'll listen.
Until then, this is nothing more than someone putting their hands over their eyes to avoid the scary part of the movie.
I think that is true mostly for baseball players, as apparently some NBA players have recovered without surgery.
If what you are saying is true, it makes no sense for PG not to have already had the surgery in order for him to recover in time for the start of next season
Well it actually does, if you do not look at it purely from a basketball pov. Maybe he can not take 500 shots a day without having pain in his elbow with that kind of injury. But he can still have a pretty nice life.
I speculated about other possible reasons earlier. I think the Clippers also think that having surgery before the trade deadline will weaken their position in negotiations. He will get surgery after the deadline which gives him ample time to recover before next season.