ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XLII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1381 » by gambitx777 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:02 pm

Well I think that's the thing right. Tanking implys you wanna loose, rebuilding is just that. I don't believe in tanking. Putting a young team put there who plays hard and wants to win while rebuilding should be the goal.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1382 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 1:42 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:If you could trick them into taking Rui instead of Avdija, it’s a home run. That would be an insulting offer to Indiana though.
I don't think it's insulting . Rui, bertans and frirst should be the offer. I would not include r
Deni or Kuz. And if that's not enough ok walk away and move on.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app

C'mon now. Rui, a bad contract, and a distant future 1st isn't getting Sabonis.

If we could get Sabonis without including any of Beal, Avdija or KCP, that would be an absolute home run.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1383 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 1:47 pm

gambitx777 wrote:Well I think that's the thing right. Tanking implys you wanna loose, rebuilding is just that. I don't believe in tanking. Putting a young team put there who plays hard and wants to win while rebuilding should be the goal.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app

Players don't tank. Front offices do. Most would agree that you never instruct your players to try and lose. That builds bad habits. What you do is ensure that they can't win consistently.

OKC is doing it right. They've got some talented players that they're developing like SGA and Giddey. But they make sure that they have absolute dreck in the front court with no decent defenders and no complimentary shooters.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1384 » by gambitx777 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:19 pm

nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:If you could trick them into taking Rui instead of Avdija, it’s a home run. That would be an insulting offer to Indiana though.
I don't think it's insulting . Rui, bertans and frirst should be the offer. I would not include r
Deni or Kuz. And if that's not enough ok walk away and move on.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app

C'mon now. Rui, a bad contract, and a distant future 1st isn't getting Sabonis.

If we could get Sabonis without including any of Beal, Avdija or KCP, that would be an absolute home run.
KCP would be fine but I'm not trading our best young player, our second best player over 25 and a first.

I don't mind being told no but I have no desire to over pay. Yes he's a very gooooooood player and I love his game he fits well with gafford. But I think that's too much.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,825
And1: 9,212
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1385 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:57 pm

Pretty much every one of these trades shares the common flaw of magical thinking: we trade a, b & c for x, y & z, and... we get so much better! Wow!

If that were so, then our trading partner would have to get "so much" worse by way of that trade. Sorry, no.

The only way that might happen is if you trade for a young guy who develops optimally or even better than expected.

As with any rule, there may be exceptions which, as they say, prove the rule. The point about exceptions is that they are rare. Simmons, for example, looks like he might be traded for less than he's worth. Sabonis sure won't be!

Just about the worst thing we could do is trade away our young players. Any of them. Just as bad would be to trade away picks.

I imagine that's what we're going to do. I can see us trading Deni, Bryant & a R1 pick (maybe more than one) for Sabonis.

Then we'll re-sign Brad at the supermax, & the next five years will be down the drain. Count on it.
CntOutSmrtCrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,556
And1: 3,585
Joined: Dec 08, 2011

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1386 » by CntOutSmrtCrazy » Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:59 pm

queridiculo wrote:This is playing out just about as poorly as I expected when Grunfeld blew it in 2016.

It was so obvious, and now, with a chance of a clean slate rebuild, the Wizards under Leonsis leadership are going to blow it again.

The fact that Leonsis felt compelled to say that they will never ever ever tank is the pinnacle of stupidity, especially considering that he's also firmly content with just making the playoffs.

Washington will never, ever, ever be a contender under this current leadership and ownership structure.

Beal will ride his super max contract into the sunset and the fans will be left holding the bag while Washington misses out on yet another generational draft in 2023.


We’re basically acting like we are the Lakers with Lebron James. Trading the farm to appease Beal now when you could very likely see him gone in a season or two. The only problem is he’s not even close to the player that even an old Lebron James is and we are not the Lakers who basically benefit from a loophole of being a storied franchise in Los Angeles that can always attract the biggest talents and not give a crap about the draft by-and-large.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1387 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:03 pm

payitforward wrote:Simmons, for example, looks like he might be traded for less than he's worth. Sabonis sure won't be!

Agreed. And hopefully Beal is still valued in the trade market at a level higher than his actual on-court impact. If we can trade an overvalued guy for an undervalued guy, we should do it. The fact that Simmons is 3 years younger is just gravy.

The key here is that it is rare to acquire a guy at below market value. Simmons happens to be one of those rare opportunities. Whether or not Simmons is the guy for us in the long run is undetermined. But Simmons the trade asset will be more valuable than Beal the trade asset as soon as next year. I guarantee that. Simmons will get back on the court and his regular season play (and the fact that he is actually playing) will help people forget the past 6 months. His value will rise. And Beal is about to sign a contract that will instantly make him a negative value guy. His value will fall.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1388 » by DCZards » Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:28 pm

Simmons value will only rise if he’s committed to working on the shortcomings in his game and not being a diva. I hope he does those things because he’s certainly a very good player.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,885
And1: 3,659
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1389 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:40 pm

Simmons and Harris for Beal, Dimwit and Bertans works.

Simmons Holiday Neto
KCP Krispy
Harris Deni
Kuz Rui
Gafford Trez Bryant
In Rizzo we trust
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1390 » by NatP4 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:56 pm

I’ve come around to the Beal for Simmons+Philly 2022 1st and filler.

You’ve gotta move Harrell for a late 1st also, and let Bryant play as a stretch 5 next to Simmons.

That would give you 3 total 1st round picks in the 2022 draft and Simmons is young enough to be a quality core piece of the future. He will still be very tradeable in the final year of his contact at 28 years old.

Rebuild instead of moving any of Rui, Deni, Kispert.

One of the blue chip prospects in the draft will be there at 6-10 range. Having a couple late 1sts gives us trade up possibilities if we finish in the 10-12 range. You could potentially add someone like Ivey, Brown, Murray, Sharpe, or Griffin to a core of Simmons, Rui, Avdija, Kispert, Bryant/Gafford.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1391 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:20 pm

DCZards wrote:Simmons value will only rise if he’s committed to working on the shortcomings in his game and not being a diva. I hope he does those things because he’s certainly a very good player.

No. His value will rise even if looks no better than he did the last 3 seasons. The last 3 seasons, he was an All-Star, and his trade value at the moment seems to be less than that of an All-Star player.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,665
And1: 1,343
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1392 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:22 pm

Thinking about this team, I think Marcus Smart would be a good player to target in a trade. Not sure what it would take.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1393 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:23 pm

NatP4 wrote:I’ve come around to the Beal for Simmons+Philly 2022 1st and filler.

You’ve gotta move Harrell for a late 1st also, and let Bryant play as a stretch 5 next to Simmons.

That would give you 3 total 1st round picks in the 2022 draft and Simmons is young enough to be a quality core piece of the future. He will still be very tradeable in the final year of his contact at 28 years old.

Rebuild instead of moving any of Rui, Deni, Kispert.

I agree that we should move Harrell too. I don't think we'd get a 1st though. We will be lucky to land a high 2nd. Rebuilding teams don't want an aging vet like Harrell, and contending teams will worry about Harrell's bad history in the playoffs. And he's an unrestricted free agent in the offseason.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1394 » by gambitx777 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:24 pm

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:Simmons value will only rise if he’s committed to working on the shortcomings in his game and not being a diva. I hope he does those things because he’s certainly a very good player.

No. His value will rise even if looks no better than he did the last 3 seasons. The last 3 seasons, he was an All-Star, and his trade value at the moment seems to be less than that of an All-Star player.
But if he doesn't do those things, his value will never come back up to what it was. He's done a lot of damage to himself.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,574
And1: 23,048
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1395 » by nate33 » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:25 pm

SUPERBALLMAN wrote:Thinking about this team, I think Marcus Smart would be a good player to target in a trade. Not sure what it would take.

I don't think Smart is a very good player. He's a guard who can't create his shot nor catch-and-shoot with good efficiency. I think he's a bit overrated as a defender too. He isn't really THAT good as an on-ball defender. His greatest strength is that he is so strong, he can comfortably switch 1 through 4 and even hold his own against 5's on the block.

Come to think of it, Smart isn't really all that unlike Deni Avdija. Except that Smart is already in the decline of his prime whereas Deni presumably will get considerably better going forward.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,392
And1: 6,795
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1396 » by TGW » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:38 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Simmons and Harris for Beal, Dimwit and Bertans works.

Simmons Holiday Neto
KCP Krispy
Harris Deni
Kuz Rui
Gafford Trez Bryant


That's awful.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 465
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1397 » by Silvie Lysandra » Sat Jan 29, 2022 6:20 pm

Beal for Simmons would be straight up highway robbery for us unless Simmons decides he doesn't want to play for us, and I hate Simmons. The fact that Ted and Tommy have already ruled this out is straight up malfeasance
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 465
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1398 » by Silvie Lysandra » Sat Jan 29, 2022 6:21 pm

TGW wrote:
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Simmons and Harris for Beal, Dimwit and Bertans works.

Simmons Holiday Neto
KCP Krispy
Harris Deni
Kuz Rui
Gafford Trez Bryant


That's awful.


If i'm trading for Simmons I'm trading for him to be a point forward, not a point guard.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,825
And1: 9,212
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1399 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:36 pm

nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:Simmons, for example, looks like he might be traded for less than he's worth. Sabonis sure won't be!

Agreed. And hopefully Beal is still valued in the trade market at a level higher than his actual on-court impact. If we can trade an overvalued guy for an undervalued guy, we should do it. The fact that Simmons is 3 years younger is just gravy.

The key here is that it is rare to acquire a guy at below market value....

Bingo!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,825
And1: 9,212
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1400 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pm

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:Simmons value will only rise if he’s committed to working on the shortcomings in his game and not being a diva. I hope he does those things because he’s certainly a very good player.

No. His value will rise even if looks no better than he did the last 3 seasons. The last 3 seasons, he was an All-Star, and his trade value at the moment seems to be less than that of an All-Star player.

For sure. & Simmons has been one of the very best players in the NBA since the first day he stepped on the court for Philly.

That said, the "diva" question can't be dismissed entirely. Every GM in the league will be aware of the risk that he'll wind up in Daryl Morey's shoes.

What would make the trade work so great for us is that it also removes a risk -- of giving a supermax to a guy who's play simply doesn't warrant it.

IOW, we're a good match.

Return to Washington Wizards