knicksNOTslick wrote:WargamesX wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:He's only here for 2 years. The best thing about it is... he gives full effort on the floor, win or lose. That makes him a good influence on the team, whether or not he is efficient, it's not like we're contending any time soon.
The Lakers are on borrowed time so they need to win this season or the next, and with very little assets.
You got to be kidding me![]()
Westbrook has played with PG. KD, Harden, Melo, Beal, and Lebron and they couldn’t make it work… but the Knicks will make it work because he gives full effort
Define make it work, because I said we're not contending either way. With Westbrook or with Randle and Fournier. But at least Westbrook don't half ass it out there and he won't take minutes from our young forwards.
I say the Knicks will be better off with Russell than with Randle's lack of effort. And we only have 2 years, not even, instead of what we committed to with Randle and Fournier. Are we doing well right now? You'd prefer that we stay as is?
Exactly, its about the contracts.
If we could get Wall instead I'd prefer that over WB but I think Rockets in full rebuild, not gonna trade for Randle, but if we could do a 3-way trade to get Wall I'd be down.