Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Adams Traded to Raiders for 2022 1st and 2nd Rd Picks

WeekapaugGroove · Post #261 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:18 pm

Profound23 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:

Read on Twitter

The new Rooney rule says you have to interview two minority candidates for GM and any coordinator position.

I didn't know that meant even if you're hiring from within but I get it.

It's a good way to self scout and get opinions on your offense from an outside perspective.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

stillgotgame · Post #262 » by **stillgotgame** » Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:20 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21

LittleRooster · Post #263 » by **LittleRooster** » Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=10

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Matches Malone · Post #264 » by **Matches Malone** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 12:32 am

I know your staff usually gets somewhat broken up when a coordinator leaves, but Hackett needs to chill and find his own guys lmao. Trying to take half the staff with him. Guessing that's why we haven't heard anything on Mo Drayton yet, cause MLF has to put out the other fires first. On top of that the Bears are trying to further the poaching process with Getsy.

Post #265 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 2:45 am

Read on Twitter

Matches Malone · Post #266 » by **Matches Malone** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 2:46 am

Making Steno the OC the obvious choice now.

Post #267 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 3:02 am

Read on Twitter

DrWood · Post #268 » by **DrWood** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 6:48 am

th87 wrote:
ReddRum wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
I don't think we get anything close to that.

Ok, so in your opinion what would we get for Rodgers and Adams?

I would be surprised if we got more than two firsts for Rodgers. He might retire the next year, and the Broncos aren't one piece away. Stafford is younger, and the Rams were far closer to contention when that trade was made, and they're a lot more "all in" than the Broncos.

I don't think we get much for Adams. Suitors lining up for the privilege to pay a WR $30M annually won't be plentiful.

But Stafford and Rodgers aren't the same guy. Stafford had a history of not winning football games. Rodgers has a history of winning football games . . . until they get in the playoffs.

I was astonished when the Rams decided Stafford was the guy to put them over the top.

th87 · Post #269 » by **th87** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:12 am

DrWood wrote:
th87 wrote:
ReddRum wrote:
Ok, so in your opinion what would we get for Rodgers and Adams?

I would be surprised if we got more than two firsts for Rodgers. He might retire the next year, and the Broncos aren't one piece away. Stafford is younger, and the Rams were far closer to contention when that trade was made, and they're a lot more "all in" than the Broncos.

I don't think we get much for Adams. Suitors lining up for the privilege to pay a WR $30M annually won't be plentiful.

But Stafford and Rodgers aren't the same guy. Stafford had a history of not winning football games. Rodgers has a history of winning football games . . . until they get in the playoffs.

I was astonished when the Rams decided Stafford was the guy to put them over the top.

A case could've been made last year that Stafford was a franchise guy toiling away in a dysfunctional organization. He was 32, would have a great team around him, could be around for years, and the Rams were only weak at QB. So that could be worth two firsts, a second, and a Goff salary dump for a team missing only a QB.

As for Rodgers, he turns 39. He could decline any minute or retire soon. He's been a diva lately and has some playoff embarrassments. Denver is still some players away. Would they gut their team to the tune of 3 first rounders plus players to get a Rodgers rental and still not be a top contender? I highly doubt it.

Dominator83 · Post #270 » by **Dominator83** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:39 am

MickeyDavis wrote:

Read on Twitter

Bears fan here i come in peace! Serious question though : is this Getsy guy even any good? Because if he was, then why didn't the Packers just promote him to their OC position?

I can see why he may find our job appealing. If Fields develops into his potential, Getsy will get most the credit and be a hot commodity for a Head coaching job ala Duball with Josh Allen. So may be he sees the Bears as a better stepping stone to keep moving up, but I would still think he just stays In Green Bay of he was offered the same position.

DrWood · Post #271 » by **DrWood** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 8:16 am

I saw a meme that said:
San Francisco passed by Aaron Rodgers in the draft, and he still gave them 4 playoff wins.

Post #272 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 12:15 pm

Dominater wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:

Read on Twitter

Bears fan here i come in peace! Serious question though : is this Getsy guy even any good? Because if he was, then why didn't the Packers just promote him to their OC position?

I can see why he may find our job appealing. If Fields develops into his potential, Getsy will get most the credit and be a hot commodity for a Head coaching job ala Duball with Josh Allen. So may be he sees the Bears as a better stepping stone to keep moving up, but I would still think he just stays In Green Bay of he was offered the same position.

He can call the plays there. MLF calls the plays in GB. That's the reason for the move, he wants to call the plays.

Matches Malone · Post #273 » by **Matches Malone** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:13 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #274 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:17 pm

Now that the dust has settled on the offensive side it's time for a new ST coach.

RubberSoul · Post #275 » by **RubberSoul** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 5:34 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Now that the dust has settled on the offensive side it's time for a new ST coach.

Getting nervous Drayton will be back. Lafleur seems like a loyal guy. The players on ST were garbage but Drayton is over his head as well. It can be both hopefully they decide to spend the money and upgrade.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post #276 » by **MickeyDavis** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 5:53 pm

RubberSoul wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Now that the dust has settled on the offensive side it's time for a new ST coach.

Getting nervous Drayton will be back. Lafleur seems like a loyal guy. The players on ST were garbage but Drayton is over his head as well. It can be both hopefully they decide to spend the money and upgrade.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly. Upgrade the ST talent AND the coach.

jakecronus8 · Post #277 » by **jakecronus8** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 6:57 pm

Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

FAH1223 · Post #278 » by **FAH1223** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:01 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

They can move money around easily.

PintSizedBox10 · Post #279 » by **PintSizedBox10** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:04 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

They can move money around easily.

But they'll have to make significant moves regardless (At least that's my understanding of the situation). I don't think they can feasibly keep the roster intact. Which is why it's the perfect time to move both for considerable draft picks and start the rebuild. QBs on their rookie deals is the best time to win a title.

Daver · Post #280 » by **Daver** » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:05 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

1st part i agree with but 2nd statement you or no one else has any idea if this team will be much worse the same or better.Assumptions is the mother of all f... ups we will see