2022 Offseason moves

Post #41 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:14 pm

Yeah, perhaps they get further with Lance and win the Super Bowl. Time will tell if he's right and Lance improves how far the team advances next year.

righterwriter · Post #42 » by **righterwriter** » Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:04 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
righterwriter wrote:All I'm getting from you is downside, but without any details. It's a lot like your draft analysis, quite empty and overconfident.

Lol...I guess we'll see.

You're right, I wasn't a huge fan of him. Mainly because he only played essentially one year of college ball at North Dakota State. A program that has put out guys like Carson Wentz, Easton Stick, etc. You can debate Wentz all day, but I've never been a huge fan of his either.

It's irrelevant who else went to his university. Much like it's irrelevant which great QBs share an Alma Mater with Josh Allen, Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, or Aaron Rodgers. It doesn't make sense to judge a prospect this way.

righterwriter wrote:Aside from the good traits and performances I've stated, I can also say what he needs to get better at- he needs to improve his footwork, needs to throw a more accurate short area pass, needs to learn when he should take off and run rather than keep looking downfield for the pass, needs to get better on timing routes.

All of which I'm in agreement with. [/quote]

Very brave of you. What did you base that on, if you haven't really watched him? Just a knack of yours? And the point was to highlight an understanding of the player by stating what he was both good and bad at. You just stuck with the bad and failed to list the good. More evidence of speaking based on something other than knowledge.

righterwriter wrote:Again, that's just not an accurate assessment.

Quite the opposite. :wink:

Look...I'm not interested in a debate with you. I've expressed my opinion on the matter & let's just leave it at that.[/quote]

Sure. I'll just be bringing it up next year when he's the starter of the 49ers. As mentioned, he'll need a few games to get adjusted, then he'll show quite clearly how he's a whole lot more than you're stating him to be.

Post #43 » by **Cactus Jack** » Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:29 pm

righterwriter wrote:Sure. I'll just be bringing it up next year when he's the starter of the 49ers. As mentioned, he'll need a few games to get adjusted, then he'll show quite clearly how he's a whole lot more than you're stating him to be.

Maybe this is a better discussion to have on the Niners board.

Post #44 » by **bwgood77** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 1:43 am

He did go undefeated in college and even passed for over 300 yards once, against Western Illinois. Three other times in his season of play he broke 200 yards passing. Then he won the Division 1 Championship over James Madison with 72 yards passing and 166 yards rushing. So he's a winner.

goober · Post #45 » by **goober** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 9:39 am

Why the Jags are delaying the inevitable of firing Baalke is just beyond me. Get rid of him now.

Post #46 » by **DOT** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 1:44 pm

goober wrote:Why the Jags are delaying the inevitable of firing Baalke is just beyond me. Get rid of him now.

Khan has put out a statement that he "doesn't feel like" doing a GM search

He's gonna let the coach pick the GM

And naturally, he's in the Caribbean right now letting Baalke oversee the coaching search and picking the coach who will decide who the GM is

We're the most incompetent organization, and it all starts with Khan.

Pharmcat · Post #47 » by **Pharmcat** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 3:08 pm

K-DOT wrote:
goober wrote:Why the Jags are delaying the inevitable of firing Baalke is just beyond me. Get rid of him now.

Khan has put out a statement that he "doesn't feel like" doing a GM search

He's gonna let the coach pick the GM

And naturally, he's in the Caribbean right now letting Baalke oversee the coaching search and picking the coach who will decide who the GM is

We're the most incompetent organization, and it all starts with Khan.

Sometimes I wonder how these owners became billionaires

macNcheese3 · Post #48 » by **macNcheese3** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 6:25 pm

Any chance Russell Wilson ends up in Vegas?

Post #49 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 7:18 pm

macNcheese3 wrote:Any chance Russell Wilson ends up in Vegas?

Zero. He's not for sale.

macNcheese3 · Post #50 » by **macNcheese3** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 8:52 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
macNcheese3 wrote:Any chance Russell Wilson ends up in Vegas?

Zero. He's not for sale.

Thats fair. There were tons of rumors of him being uncertain about Seattle. I'd happily replace Carr with RW.

Mamba Mentality · Post #51 » by **Mamba Mentality** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 8:54 pm

Jimmy said his reps and the Niners are working together to find a trade partner. The Trey Lance era is officially upon us. :clap:

Read on Twitter

Post #52 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 9:30 pm

macNcheese3 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
macNcheese3 wrote:Any chance Russell Wilson ends up in Vegas?

Zero. He's not for sale.

Thats fair. There were tons of rumors of him being uncertain about Seattle. I'd happily replace Carr with RW.

Those rumors we're based on the idea that Pete would be replaced. That's not happening. So Wilson is staying put.

Post #53 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 10:05 pm

Mamba Mentality wrote:Jimmy said his reps and the Niners are working together to find a trade partner. The Trey Lance era is officially upon us.

Read on Twitter

I mean it was pretty apparent that was the plan all along. You don't take a guy that high in the draft & give up that much draft capital just to have him sit.

macNcheese3 · Post #54 » by **macNcheese3** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 10:51 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
macNcheese3 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Zero. He's not for sale.

Thats fair. There were tons of rumors of him being uncertain about Seattle. I'd happily replace Carr with RW.

Those rumors we're based on the idea that Pete would be replaced. That's not happening. So Wilson is staying put.

Fair enough. Do you think the Raiders keep Carr? What is your take on their QB situation. I like Carr but don't love him. A. Rodgers would be a pipe dream.

goober · Post #55 » by **goober** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 11:08 pm

macNcheese3 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
macNcheese3 wrote:
Thats fair. There were tons of rumors of him being uncertain about Seattle. I'd happily replace Carr with RW.

Those rumors we're based on the idea that Pete would be replaced. That's not happening. So Wilson is staying put.

Fair enough. Do you think the Raiders keep Carr? What is your take on their QB situation. I like Carr but don't love him. A. Rodgers would be a pipe dream.

Rodgers could be a possibility, if he wants to be a Raider Carr will be gone.

Other than that, Carr probably stays

macNcheese3 · Post #56 » by **macNcheese3** » Tue Feb 1, 2022 11:48 pm

goober wrote:
macNcheese3 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Those rumors we're based on the idea that Pete would be replaced. That's not happening. So Wilson is staying put.

Fair enough. Do you think the Raiders keep Carr? What is your take on their QB situation. I like Carr but don't love him. A. Rodgers would be a pipe dream.

Rodgers could be a possibility, if he wants to be a Raider Carr will be gone.

Other than that, Carr probably stays

That’s right - if he wants to be a Raider and LV is appealing to him and of course Carr would be gone then. I’m all up for moving on from Carr. While he needs better receivers IMO. Renfrew made the pro bowl but I’m not sold on him.

Jack Dempsey · Post #57 » by **Jack Dempsey** » Sat Feb 5, 2022 6:15 pm

https://titanswire.usatoday.com/2022/02/05/tennessee-titans-aaron-rodgers-green-bay-packers-report/

So Aaron Rodgers is buying land in Tennessee but the Titans announced they don't consider him an option and intend to keep Ryan Tannehill :crazy:

if true

IMO the Titans should break the bank for Rodgers. I have to admit I'm not familiar with the NFL CBA but they should offer Green Bay as many Draft picks as possible. Getting rid of Tannehill is already an addition by subtraction but replacing him with Rodgers would make them the team to beat next year. I like Laundry, Simmons and the rest but Derrick Henry is their biggest star and his window will be open for another 2 or 3 years max. No need to waste his prime with Tannehill running the offense.

On the other side, replacing Rodgers with Tannehill probably sounds like a bad dream for every Packers fan. But if Rodgers wants to leave, they could give the starting job to Jordan Love with Tannehill backing him up for a year (IIRC his contract runs out in 2023) and add huge draft capital.

JujitsuFlip · Post #58 » by **JujitsuFlip** » Mon Feb 14, 2022 3:36 am

NFL FA starts in 4 weeks, Bengals look to have $55 million in cap space but once they cut Waynes that goes up to ~$67 million.

Bengals need to replace their RG and RT in FA without a doubt. The C and LG more than likely need to be replaced in FA too. Jonah will probably have to stay at LT, for better or worse.

Followed by Bengals need to trade up and get a CB1 in the first round of the draft.

Dr Positivity · Post #59 » by **Dr Positivity** » Tue Feb 15, 2022 8:29 am

After seeing Stafford's success and how it's dumb to judge QBs by how good their team is, should someone go big on Kirk Cousins? He has averaged 31 TDs 9 Ints a year for Vikings over 4 years has higher career passer rating than Brady and Manning.

Post #60 » by **Worm Guts** » Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:43 pm

Cousins could probably be a winner under the right set of circumstances, but he doesn't have the same arm talent as someone like Stafford. Certain guys like Eli Manning and Joe Flacco weren't the most consistent QB's, but their arm talent allowed them to get hot and make plays out of nothing. They could go on hot streaks and win Super Bowls. Cousins needs protection. When he gets protection, he can be great. I think he would need to be on a team with a great offensive line.