Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Lakers, Kings, or Portland may be our only hope to move Randle.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles
Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
Marty McFly wrote:Randle put up 24/10/6 won MIP and was top ten in MVP voting. he's 27 years old.
He's putting up 18/9/5 this year, whilst having a bad shooting year.
taking two less field goals a game, scoring two less field goals a game. making one less three pointer than last year.
Anyone who doesn't think he has value isn't thinking clearly. does him being a basket case lower his value? sure. that doesn't mean he doesn't have value.
he needs a change of scenery.
Marty McFly wrote:Randle put up 24/10/6 won MIP and was top ten in MVP voting. he's 27 years old.
He's putting up 18/9/5 this year, whilst having a bad shooting year.
taking two less field goals a game, scoring two less field goals a game. making one less three pointer than last year.
Anyone who doesn't think he has value isn't thinking clearly. does him being a basket case lower his value? sure. that doesn't mean he doesn't have value.
he needs a change of scenery.
snadler wrote:Marty McFly wrote:Randle put up 24/10/6 won MIP and was top ten in MVP voting. he's 27 years old.
He's putting up 18/9/5 this year, whilst having a bad shooting year.
taking two less field goals a game, scoring two less field goals a game. making one less three pointer than last year.
Anyone who doesn't think he has value isn't thinking clearly. does him being a basket case lower his value? sure. that doesn't mean he doesn't have value.
he needs a change of scenery.
Here’s the biggest issue, Randle at this years salary tradeable, next years 28 million for the next 4, makes him untradeable..because you not only need a team to want him but also pay that 113 million which is unlikely unless another team wants to dump their high priced underachieving player, hence Fox and maybe Only a few others fit that which means he’s very very unlikely to be moved
WargamesX wrote:snadler wrote:Marty McFly wrote:Randle put up 24/10/6 won MIP and was top ten in MVP voting. he's 27 years old.
He's putting up 18/9/5 this year, whilst having a bad shooting year.
taking two less field goals a game, scoring two less field goals a game. making one less three pointer than last year.
Anyone who doesn't think he has value isn't thinking clearly. does him being a basket case lower his value? sure. that doesn't mean he doesn't have value.
he needs a change of scenery.
Here’s the biggest issue, Randle at this years salary tradeable, next years 28 million for the next 4, makes him untradeable..because you not only need a team to want him but also pay that 113 million which is unlikely unless another team wants to dump their high priced underachieving player, hence Fox and maybe Only a few others fit that which means he’s very very unlikely to be moved
That’s not how his salary works it starts at $23 Mil and goes up to $29 Mil. The average year is not the real amount which means he is still tradeable a year later at 23. It’s not until the last two years that the salary is near 28 Mil a year.
snadler wrote:WargamesX wrote:snadler wrote:
Here’s the biggest issue, Randle at this years salary tradeable, next years 28 million for the next 4, makes him untradeable..because you not only need a team to want him but also pay that 113 million which is unlikely unless another team wants to dump their high priced underachieving player, hence Fox and maybe Only a few others fit that which means he’s very very unlikely to be moved
That’s not how his salary works it starts at $23 Mil and goes up to $29 Mil. The average year is not the real amount which means he is still tradeable a year later at 23. It’s not until the last two years that the salary is near 28 Mil a year.
It’s 113 over the next 4..so the question is, if Randle was a free agent this summer how many teams would be willing to play him 4-113.. not many at that price coming of this season
Clyde_Style wrote:4 Mo Days
until this guy can get shipped out
Wake Up Leon!
Clyde_Style wrote:4 Mo Days
until this guy can get shipped out
Wake Up Leon!
HerSports85 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:4 Mo Days
until this guy can get shipped out
Wake Up Leon!
I thought it was Feb. 3rd.
Marty McFly wrote:Randle put up 24/10/6 won MIP and was top ten in MVP voting. he's 27 years old.
He's putting up 18/9/5 this year, whilst having a bad shooting year.
taking two less field goals a game, scoring two less field goals a game. making one less three pointer than last year.
Anyone who doesn't think he has value isn't thinking clearly. does him being a basket case lower his value? sure. that doesn't mean he doesn't have value.
he needs a change of scenery.
Stannis wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:4 Mo Days
until this guy can get shipped out
Wake Up Leon!
Goodbye assets.
Seems like everyone around the league is viewing Randle as a blackhole with negative value.
The times they are a changin... Maybe back in 2008 Knicks could have traded Randle easily. But with all the tools, analytics, and even social media, it's obvious Randle is a negative net value.
Knicks will never learn lol. Amar'e should've been fresh on Dolan's mind. And that's the vibe I got with Randle. I know he's healthier, but he's still a numbers guy that requires too many role players and defenders to make him for his lack of leadership and defense.
fatalogic wrote:Stannis wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:4 Mo Days
until this guy can get shipped out
Wake Up Leon!
Goodbye assets.
Seems like everyone around the league is viewing Randle as a blackhole with negative value.
The times they are a changin... Maybe back in 2008 Knicks could have traded Randle easily. But with all the tools, analytics, and even social media, it's obvious Randle is a negative net value.
Knicks will never learn lol. Amar'e should've been fresh on Dolan's mind. And that's the vibe I got with Randle. I know he's healthier, but he's still a numbers guy that requires too many role players and defenders to make him for his lack of leadership and defense.
....Literally above your post is Brian Windhorst explaining why Randle has value. Randle at his career averages is worth his contract, if he plays like he did last year it's a value contract. When locked in he can defend multiple positions for spurts. All of that is worth a lot more than most fans give him credit for. I still think he may need a change in scenery but they not going to get fleeced in a trade. This FO also has been pretty good in trades so far.
delvec19 wrote:?s=20&t=o02EL-6erq07YeEQyRqiTg
F N 11 wrote:delvec19 wrote:?s=20&t=o02EL-6erq07YeEQyRqiTg
Quick post this in the actual rumors thread. We live..
RIP mags