wolves_89 wrote:shrink wrote:Domejandro wrote:Issue is Darren Wolfson directly contradicted his own scoop and he has a reputation for being pretty hit-or-miss. I am sure discussions are being had, but the value stuff entirely seems speculative. He does this a decent amount.
Bullseye! I was going to say the exact same thing!
I like Doogie, but since he covers all MIN sports and not just pro basketball, I think his speculation is below average.
With Wolfson you have to separate his opinions from the things he reports from sources. I value his source based insights, but don't give his opinions a lot of weight.
Most of the "inside info" you hear about is from agents and those are the people most likely to talk to him.
He had the Rosas being a creeper scoop and sat on that until it came out but hinted about things not being great in the wolves FO.
His own speculation isnt always the greatest, and sometimes these guys do get misled.
And talking about his kids on his public twitter all the time is just cringe.
Jon K is probably the only other solid source of legit inside information, but he is more cautious about what he lets out.
If I want to read an opinion piece about the team, Dane Moore seems to have a lot better insight into the x's and o's and breaking down why things are working and not working and if I want an actual basketball breakdown of the team hes my go to.