esqtvd wrote:Moronic. We got him for nothing and the kid played his ass off.
We got him for Reggie Bullock, who might not be anything special, but is still lightyears ahead of Austin.
Bullock: -0.8 career BPM, 2.8 career VORP
Austin: -3.0 career BPM, -3.9 career VORP
Austin has never once in his career had a season of positive impact on the court, no matter what role he's playing or what team he's on, while Bullock had three positive seasons in a row on some talent-deficient Pistons teams. We would have been much better off with Bullock staying out of the way and making some occasional threes than we were with the Doc/Austin clown show.
There's also nothing "moronic" about pointing out the obvious chemistry issues in the locker room re: Austin, which were widely reported on at the time.
At some point, a team stops believing it can win. Players get tired of each other, and yearn to try new things. The culture had eroded. Insiders complained about a lack of accountability -- about practices and shootarounds starting late, and Austin Rivers carrying himself like an anointed superstar.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/19758988/zach-lowe-chris-paul-james-harden-running-houston-rockets-nba
Because he's Austin Rivers, because he's Doc's son, it's always going to be awkward for everyone involved. Even last year, it's not so much that they re-signed him, it's that they re-signed him before Jamal [Crawford]. So, if you pay him first, what does that signal to the rest of the team? That you took care of your son first.
https://www.espn.com/espnradio/play?id=19768773
The in-house resentment toward Austin Rivers being favored as Doc's son, according to team sources, still very much exists
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2699554-after-all-their-progress-the-clippers-are-a-franchise-at-a-dangerous-crossroads
Austin's presence on the team complicated the relationship between Doc and the locker room. Among themselves, certain players wondered whether Rivers' minutes were always earned, and some felt Austin, though occasionally criticized in film sessions, wasn't subjected to the same accountability in practice or games. They bristled at the suggestion that Austin was an additive on defense, a premise that Doc presented to the media and internally.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/23092424/nba-did-doc-rivers-make-los-angeles-clippers-break-them
Turns out that nepotism is unpopular and deeply offensive to players who worked hard for their spot in the league without having connections. Who could have guessed? Not GM Doc. And we wonder why Lob City looked like they hated basketball in their last couple seasons together.
That trade was one of the most selfish decisions in sports history. By trading for Austin, Doc put himself ahead of the team. He decided he was going to rescue his son's failing career and he didn't care what the other players thought. And the predictable result is that the team fell apart. That alone disproves your argument that none of Doc's trades ever hurt us.
He walked away clean and as one of the only black coaches to ever win a championship Doc helped attract Kawhi to the Clippers.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/clippers/story/2019-09-18/doc-rivers-hero-clippers-signed-kawhi-leonard-paul-george
Gee, I wonder who planted that story in the media.
PG's comments on Doc the offseason after the bubble are an obvious indication of how he and Kawhi really feel about him.
It was OK with me that Doc was eventually fired from both posts. Organizations have to move on. But Doc Rivers was NOT the reason Lob City didn't win a title.
He was one of the biggest reasons, between his historic meltdowns as a coach and his utter incompetence as a GM.






















