30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic
Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77

Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.feyki wrote:Doncic entered the bbref's mvp tracking, here's his last 10 games:
30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic?

harlem_ball wrote:Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.feyki wrote:Doncic entered the bbref's mvp tracking, here's his last 10 games:
30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic?
Edit: I'm wrong. Mavs have a good record now.
mediocrityrules wrote:harlem_ball wrote:Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.feyki wrote:Doncic entered the bbref's mvp tracking, here's his last 10 games:
30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic?
Edit: I'm wrong. Mavs have a good record now.
Mavs have been sneaking up the standings a bit recently. Forgetting the awful loss to OKC a couple of games ago, they've started to turn it around.
Still can't see Luka breaking into the top 3 in the MVP race (with Curry still at the door in 4th, CP3 hanging at 5 - at least in my view)

harlem_ball wrote:Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.feyki wrote:Doncic entered the bbref's mvp tracking, here's his last 10 games:
30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic?
Edit: I'm wrong. Mavs have a good record now.
sisibilio wrote:harlem_ball wrote:Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.feyki wrote:Doncic entered the bbref's mvp tracking, here's his last 10 games:
30 PPG, 10 RPG, 10 APG, 120 ORTG
. Better than Magic?
Edit: I'm wrong. Mavs have a good record now.
Mavs had a surprisingly good record all season, much better than they should
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
BoatsNZones wrote:sisibilio wrote:harlem_ball wrote:Mavs suck, these are empty stats ala Westbrook.
Edit: I'm wrong. Mavs have a good record now.
Mavs had a surprisingly good record all season, much better than they should
Similar to Ja Morant and the Grizz, the Mavs actually have faired worse with Luka on the floor this season. This could get into a more in depth discussion about rotations and how certain players should be utilized, but these are not exactly small sample sizes at this point. To be sure, neither are remotely close to MVP caliber players this season.
boogiezen wrote:BoatsNZones wrote:sisibilio wrote:Mavs had a surprisingly good record all season, much better than they should
Similar to Ja Morant and the Grizz, the Mavs actually have faired worse with Luka on the floor this season. This could get into a more in depth discussion about rotations and how certain players should be utilized, but these are not exactly small sample sizes at this point. To be sure, neither are remotely close to MVP caliber players this season.
Dallas is under 500 without Luka. Completely opposite from Memphis which has a good record even without Morant.
harlem_ball wrote:Morris is gonna end up suing the crap out of Jokic if his career is in jeopardy.moderndarwin wrote:It’s Steph.
Also didn’t realize that Morris was still out because of that Joker retaliation. Good. It’s really weak sauce when people make non basketball fouls to hurt others. Karma.
BoatsNZones wrote:boogiezen wrote:BoatsNZones wrote:Similar to Ja Morant and the Grizz, the Mavs actually have faired worse with Luka on the floor this season. This could get into a more in depth discussion about rotations and how certain players should be utilized, but these are not exactly small sample sizes at this point. To be sure, neither are remotely close to MVP caliber players this season.
Dallas is under 500 without Luka. Completely opposite from Memphis which has a good record even without Morant.
I'm looking at their actual on/off numbers over the course of the entire season.
Although the Memphis winning streak against ****/skeleton teams that created a hate thread on Ja was predictable and funny.
Point is, neither of these players have brought an impact anywhere near the top 4 MVP favorites, and we can probably leave it at that... but both will definitely be in consideration for a few fringe top-5 votes, and that's nothing to sneeze at.

falcolombardi wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:xdrta+ wrote:So it's OK to react like he did against Markieff Morris, who has now missed 44 games with a spinal injury and who knows if or when he'll play again. Running into him from behind is OK with you, because he didn't like the way he was fouled.
So, felt like I should comment on this:
First thing I want to say is that I don't like how the NBA is being so lenient with punishment right now. This thing where a guy breaking rules with violence that causes injury only results in a 1 game suspension needs to stop. I don't think it's clear what the suspension for a Jokic or Grayson Allen play, but it feels like the NBA isn't really grappling with it. The NBA of David Stern was known for overreacting to stuff like this, and I don't want to go back to that ridiculous era, but I think there's a middle ground we can find.
And I'll tell you: If something like this made you refuse to consider Jokic for MVP, I really wouldn't have a problem with that...but I'm not comfortable ignoring a player who is actually playing when I do these evaluations.
But over to the Morris side, let me acknowledge that my first reaction toward him here was devoid of sympathy. The Morris brothers aren't just random NBA players, they have among the very worst reputations in the league as violent bullies, and so I really can't get behind the idea the foul against Jokic by Markieff was just an innocent thing. They were clearly doing the whole "make'em have to hurt, even if they beat you" thing, and when you do that, and the other person reacts, you brought it upon yourself. And when you bring it on yourself, and then afterward you continue to insult and threaten the guy you started this s**t with, you just make it that much easier for me to roll my eyes at you.
Then there's the matter of doing the quick dirty foul and walking away with your back to the guy. Morris was clearly thinking then - and has said so explicitly later - that if Jokic responded and hit him when he was walking away, that Jokic would be the one who looked weak. But that logic only works if you first stick around and dare the guy to get you from the front. When you turn your back right away, you're just making your body uniquely vulnerable to a counterattack...
Which is of course why Morris got so badly hurt despite Jokic clearly not actually attacking him like he would if were a more serious fight. If you really want to hurt somebody, you don't just shoulder check him. But when you turn your back on a guy you risk getting whiplash even from a shoulder push, particularly when the guy is a lot bigger than you...which is why you would never do this to a guy much bigger than you if you were just in some random place and focused on making sure you were protecting yourself.
But with all that said:
I hate that Markieff has been derailed like he has for so long now. I hope he gets back to 100% with godspeed, and if Jokic only got a short suspension because it was a first offense, well, Jokic needs to have a much more severe punishment if he ever hurts someone with non-basketball action on the court again.
i think is more important to evaluate the action and mot the results when it comes to dirty or injury causing play
some incredibly dirty and dangerous plays may not cause anythingh, a normal basketball mpve can cause a serious injury, which is why i dont like the idea that punishment comes based on whether you caused a injury or not
or put another way, a basketball move that unfortunately ends causing injury shouldnt lead to a suspensión, a dirty basketball move that fortunately doesnt cause anythingh should lead to a suspensión
in that criteria i think grayson allen swipe down contesting caruso is closer to a legitimate basketball move (if a reckless one) than jokic (or morris before that)
but the reaction was a lot harsher to the former
to keep a reputation of fairness nba needs to very carefully and precisely decide what makes a play punishment worthy or not and not just punish whoever player that causes a injury to go along with "popular demand" the reasoning for grayson allen suspensión should not be tied to caruso injury
off topic but this reminds me that i called jokic push as extremely dangerous months ago, both here and in pc board and most people told me i was overreacting.... sudden inpacts like that when you dont expect them are freajking dangerous, that is how people necks ans spines break in car crashes
i REALLY think morris hate made people overlook how jokic push was legit life threatening (not so much as killing morris, "just" a huge danger to his life quality and longterm health)
Doctor MJ wrote:falcolombardi wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:
So, felt like I should comment on this:
First thing I want to say is that I don't like how the NBA is being so lenient with punishment right now. This thing where a guy breaking rules with violence that causes injury only results in a 1 game suspension needs to stop. I don't think it's clear what the suspension for a Jokic or Grayson Allen play, but it feels like the NBA isn't really grappling with it. The NBA of David Stern was known for overreacting to stuff like this, and I don't want to go back to that ridiculous era, but I think there's a middle ground we can find.
And I'll tell you: If something like this made you refuse to consider Jokic for MVP, I really wouldn't have a problem with that...but I'm not comfortable ignoring a player who is actually playing when I do these evaluations.
But over to the Morris side, let me acknowledge that my first reaction toward him here was devoid of sympathy. The Morris brothers aren't just random NBA players, they have among the very worst reputations in the league as violent bullies, and so I really can't get behind the idea the foul against Jokic by Markieff was just an innocent thing. They were clearly doing the whole "make'em have to hurt, even if they beat you" thing, and when you do that, and the other person reacts, you brought it upon yourself. And when you bring it on yourself, and then afterward you continue to insult and threaten the guy you started this s**t with, you just make it that much easier for me to roll my eyes at you.
Then there's the matter of doing the quick dirty foul and walking away with your back to the guy. Morris was clearly thinking then - and has said so explicitly later - that if Jokic responded and hit him when he was walking away, that Jokic would be the one who looked weak. But that logic only works if you first stick around and dare the guy to get you from the front. When you turn your back right away, you're just making your body uniquely vulnerable to a counterattack...
Which is of course why Morris got so badly hurt despite Jokic clearly not actually attacking him like he would if were a more serious fight. If you really want to hurt somebody, you don't just shoulder check him. But when you turn your back on a guy you risk getting whiplash even from a shoulder push, particularly when the guy is a lot bigger than you...which is why you would never do this to a guy much bigger than you if you were just in some random place and focused on making sure you were protecting yourself.
But with all that said:
I hate that Markieff has been derailed like he has for so long now. I hope he gets back to 100% with godspeed, and if Jokic only got a short suspension because it was a first offense, well, Jokic needs to have a much more severe punishment if he ever hurts someone with non-basketball action on the court again.
i think is more important to evaluate the action and mot the results when it comes to dirty or injury causing play
some incredibly dirty and dangerous plays may not cause anythingh, a normal basketball mpve can cause a serious injury, which is why i dont like the idea that punishment comes based on whether you caused a injury or not
or put another way, a basketball move that unfortunately ends causing injury shouldnt lead to a suspensión, a dirty basketball move that fortunately doesnt cause anythingh should lead to a suspensión
in that criteria i think grayson allen swipe down contesting caruso is closer to a legitimate basketball move (if a reckless one) than jokic (or morris before that)
but the reaction was a lot harsher to the former
to keep a reputation of fairness nba needs to very carefully and precisely decide what makes a play punishment worthy or not and not just punish whoever player that causes a injury to go along with "popular demand" the reasoning for grayson allen suspensión should not be tied to caruso injury
off topic but this reminds me that i called jokic push as extremely dangerous months ago, both here and in pc board and most people told me i was overreacting.... sudden inpacts like that when you dont expect them are freajking dangerous, that is how people necks ans spines break in car crashes
i REALLY think morris hate made people overlook how jokic push was legit life threatening (not so much as killing morris, "just" a huge danger to his life quality and longterm health)
So I can’t help but ask myself how this would look if Jokic and Allen switched places.
If Allen did what Jokic did, what would happen? Well, key thing: Morris would have been fine. He wouldn’t have moved so violently. He likely would not have fallen down. He likely would not have been hurt.
In general going up to someone and giving them a shoulder bump is not an attack, it’s a message saying “Hey if a fight is what you want, I’m right here.”, because actual attacks involve parts of the body that can be moved with far greater speed.
Literally the only reason this has been a thing beyond the night in question is because Jokic is so much bigger than Morris…which is why you don’t F with much bigger guys and then turn your back in them because they might end up seriously hurting you even without an intended attack.
Now, I certainly understand the reality that if you’re the much bigger dude, and you hurt someone even by accident, you will get blamed. This is why I really wouldn’t object to Jokic getting a much bigger penalty when it turned out Morris was seriously hurt…but let’s just say that Caruso would have been in great danger with Jokic pulling an Allen too, and I’d have been far more bothered by Jokic’s actions there because he would have been endangering someone who had only been playing basketball.
When a big guy doesn’t know his own strength when he responds to someone else’s violence, I think it’s fair to say he’s on the hook for that…but that doesn’t mean the guy who started it is an innocent.
Why is Caruso where he is right now? Because Allen purposefully made a foul harder than he needed to.
Why is Morris out right now? Because Morris himself chose to make a foul harder than he needed to, and the guy he fouled responded.
Allen and Morris are the similar actors here - with similar reputations before the events in question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

falcolombardi wrote:i think that all is fair, my point is mostly thst i dont think who did the dirty foul, who receives the dirty foul and whether it causes a injury or not should have any bearing in the punishment
which is what it has felt like lately
grayson history od dirty plays shouldnt (imo) make his punishment bigger, it would make more sense that a player who accunulates multiple punishment worthy plays receives a bigger penalty, not thst they receive a bigger punish someone else would for the same foul (Which it seems is what people asking for sometimes)
the injury part is about how sometimes whether a play was dirty or not has relatively little bearing in whether it ends up in injury or not,
i would hate to have a league where a tough but mostly fair play leads to a injury by happenstance and the player is suspenden while someone who did a injury cauaing move like tripping a player gets away easy because nobody got hurt (which is what a lot arguments have been like, grayson deserved a bigger punishment for cauaing a injury or morris)
that is why i dont think jokic should have had a bigger suspensión because he injured morris, he should have got a bigger suspensión because he did somethingh way too dangerous even if it was on retaliatiom of morris own dirty play
if morris didnt get injured and played the next day i would still say jokic would reserve a serious punishment to dissuade players from doing thinghs like these
similarly i think morris would deserve one for his dirty play regardless of jokic not getting hurt by it
Sgt Major wrote:Outplayed by DeRozan who got 45 lol