celtics543 wrote:Why would the Knicks trade for him if Thibs didn't want him? What was there to be gained?
Were the Duke trio big buddies?
I can see it as a desperation move to lure Zion to NY...
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
celtics543 wrote:Why would the Knicks trade for him if Thibs didn't want him? What was there to be gained?
Swish1906 wrote:celtics543 wrote:Why would the Knicks trade for him if Thibs didn't want him? What was there to be gained?
Were the Duke trio big buddies?
I can see it as a desperation move to lure Zion to NY...
buckboy wrote:Did some people think the Knicks won that deal?
Reddish is garbage.
buckboy wrote:Did some people think the Knicks won that deal?
Reddish is garbage.
ForeverTFC wrote:Thibs will be gone soon.
Tor_Raps wrote:ForeverTFC wrote:Thibs will be gone soon.
And that fixes the Knicks problem how? They've had major problems this whole century.
iLLmatic860 wrote:buckboy wrote:Did some people think the Knicks won that deal?
Reddish is garbage.
Knox is even worse. Lol So it all comes down to who they draft with the protected 1st. So way to soon. So far Knicks still won the trade
ForeverTFC wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:ForeverTFC wrote:Thibs will be gone soon.
And that fixes the Knicks problem how? They've had major problems this whole century.
It doesn't fix their problems but it will give playing time to their younger players. Whole point of this thread is the DNP-CDs for Reddish. Thibs doesn't play young guys.
Tor_Raps wrote:ForeverTFC wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:
And that fixes the Knicks problem how? They've had major problems this whole century.
It doesn't fix their problems but it will give playing time to their younger players. Whole point of this thread is the DNP-CDs for Reddish. Thibs doesn't play young guys.
They signed Kemba and Fournier in the offseason. They are obviously trying to win now. It's not like they're rebuilding.
Just a weird dynamic to not have the GM and the coach on the same page. Just when you think they turned the corner, they resort back to their old ways lol.
Franco wrote:The Knicks are back to their old ways. How the **** do you give up assets to trade for a player your coach doesn't want to play? Good god
Scalabrine wrote:Franco wrote:The Knicks are back to their old ways. How the **** do you give up assets to trade for a player your coach doesn't want to play? Good god
Who do you want them to bench to get Reddish minutes?
I think people are jumping the gun here and we need to wait till after the trade deadline to start crying about this. We have a log jam at every position and I wouldn't be surprised to see some moves to alleviate that a bit. If not, and we're still on the outside looking in of the playoffs, and we're still playing our vets more than our young guys, and Reddish is still on the bench getting DNP's, then I'll start questioning what was the point, but I think we still have another week or two before that really starts to surface.
The pick is so heavily protected that I don't mind it it being traded. It's not some huge "asset". My bigger critique is why not just use the 19th pick? At best that pick is in the 20's at worst it's two second rounders, so why not just use it on Kai Jones or Keon Johnson or Cam Thomas, or Usman Garuba? I guess when I write it all out, I'd still rather have Cam Reddish on the bench than any of those guys.
euroleague wrote:His team would be considered a super-team in other eras, and that's why commentators like Charles Barkley criticize LBJ for his complaining. He has talent on his team, he just doesn't try during the regular season
Franco wrote:Scalabrine wrote:Franco wrote:The Knicks are back to their old ways. How the **** do you give up assets to trade for a player your coach doesn't want to play? Good god
Who do you want them to bench to get Reddish minutes?
I think people are jumping the gun here and we need to wait till after the trade deadline to start crying about this. We have a log jam at every position and I wouldn't be surprised to see some moves to alleviate that a bit. If not, and we're still on the outside looking in of the playoffs, and we're still playing our vets more than our young guys, and Reddish is still on the bench getting DNP's, then I'll start questioning what was the point, but I think we still have another week or two before that really starts to surface.
The pick is so heavily protected that I don't mind it it being traded. It's not some huge "asset". My bigger critique is why not just use the 19th pick? At best that pick is in the 20's at worst it's two second rounders, so why not just use it on Kai Jones or Keon Johnson or Cam Thomas, or Usman Garuba? I guess when I write it all out, I'd still rather have Cam Reddish on the bench than any of those guys.
My biggest concern isn't really that they gave up the pick, nor that Reddish isn't playing because there's legitimately better players (even if they are older) on the roster that he shouldn't get playing time over. I'm questioning the decision of trading for a player that your own coach (reportedly) didn't want to begin with, so if he indeed doesn't get PT after the trade deadline you will essentially have traded for nothing at all.
If it turns out this is bull and the reason he isn't getting PT is really the rotation being too crowded, then I'll gladly eat crow. As fun as it can be to dunk on the Knicks, I don't want an young player's career to be derailed for that.