NotMyKawhi wrote:The raptors not trading dragic is the biggest L
You can't use that 19 million to sign anyone. you'll be over the cap even w/o the 19 million. Horrible decision by MU imo
The deadline is on the 10th.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
NotMyKawhi wrote:The raptors not trading dragic is the biggest L
You can't use that 19 million to sign anyone. you'll be over the cap even w/o the 19 million. Horrible decision by MU imo
LoveMyRaps wrote:What would our lineup look like with Turner?
FVV
Trent
OG
Siakam
Turner
???
I don't want Barnes coming off the bench. He deserves to be a full time starter. But so do the other 4 guys that currently round out our starting lineup. Maybe Turner should come off the bench? What do y'all think?
Personally I think it's matchup dependent. If we're playing a team with a big like Embiid, Jokic, etc. then Turner should start. Otherwise, we roll out the FVV/Trent/OG/Siakam/Barnes lineup.
ATLTimekeeper wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:TheBoi10 wrote:Turner would start in key matchups vs the Embiids and Vucevics of the world. Otherwise play his 30 mins off the bench.
Idk why this is so hard for some people to comprehend especially when we literally went through the same thing when we had Gasol and Ibaka just a couple of years ago lol
It didn't last long, and it was for a title. Gasol basically left the NBA the second he was benched with the Lakers. He had a huge ego about starting, and then Serge didn't re-sign here in part because he wanted Gasol gone and the Raptors wanted them both back. Asking Turner to come off the bench is a bad idea, and then asking Trent to come off the bench is a worse idea, given how he's thriving in the role he's been given, and then asking Barnes to come off the bench is probably not the direction the Raptors should consider going.
The time to go for Turner is next year, when he's heading into his UFA season. The Raptors will have more information on their starting 5, Achiuwa and Barnes. I'd be surprised if there's actual legs to this rumour.
Asif16 wrote:So webster said no big deals happening? I
s dragic considered a big deal? Are we not trading dragic?
MavCarter wrote:Asif16 wrote:So webster said no big deals happening? I
s dragic considered a big deal? Are we not trading dragic?
Dragic is an expiring that will probably net us a bench player. That isnt a big deal lol
NotMyKawhi wrote:The raptors not trading dragic is the biggest L
You can't use that 19 million to sign anyone. you'll be over the cap even w/o the 19 million. Horrible decision by MU imo
Asif16 wrote:
srhcan wrote:ash_k wrote:srhcan wrote:Damn.So Raptors are not interested in Nurkic?
that's right, his defense is too limited.
Are we talking about same Nurkic who is among top NBA players defensively? His defensive rating is better than any current player on Raptors.
The formula is: Defensive Player Rating = (Players Steals*Blocks) + Opponents Differential= 1/5 of possessions - Times blown by + Deflections * OAPDW( Official Adjusted Players Defensive Withstand).

WuTang_OG wrote:Willing to take on longer term deals