Morris_Shatford wrote:Rodrickle wrote:Eric Gordon was known to be a good defender, has any metric shown otherwise?Morris_Shatford wrote:Re: Gordon
He may be amongst the worst defenders at his position in the league at this point, who is 33, is owed 19.6m next season, BUT he is career 37% PT shooter who is shooting 43% this season.
I am not the biggest fan of converting Dragic into a single player but if this is the best that can be done at the deadline, sure.
As for trading an FRP to land him;
I wouldn't be a fan personally because at this point in his career Gordon is just a shooter and generally speaking I am fairly confident that shooting can be addressed in the draft (with far better cost controls) or via the MLE this summer. Despite our awful bench shooting I am pretty sure we could do better than Gordon for cheaper than Gordon and younger than Gordon in the off-season.
Sent from my SM-G973W using RealGM mobile app
I can certainly do a little more digging when I am not on my phone,
But his DefRtg is the worst of his career, his DWS has trended negative for the first time in his career, then of course there is the eye test, he looks like he is moving in slow motion compared to even a few seasons ago with the Rox.
He is having a hard time staying in front of quicker guards which makes sense considering he is 33.
On a team where your effort on the other-side of the floor gets you minutes he may have an issue in a Nick Nurse system
Or alternatively, Houston stinks and its hard to put a solid 100% effort in when you are expected to lose.
Could be both instead of an either/or situation.
Guarantee he ticks up a notch by playing on a competitive team, and NOT Houston.
That said, 33 and an injury riddled past, I wouldn't be shocked if he was no longer capable of being a decent defender. That seems about the age players lose a step. He needs to tick up more than a notch to hold his own on our team IMO.

















