Dupp wrote:Not often a lebron led team does nothing at the deadline… kinda weird.
Also, Schroeder turned down 100mil.. dang
Lakers should grab him if he gets bought out
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

Dupp wrote:Not often a lebron led team does nothing at the deadline… kinda weird.
Also, Schroeder turned down 100mil.. dang
RCM88x wrote:Mos_Heat wrote:RCM88x wrote:
As long as you have a boss you can be blameless.
I disagree they were in a good spot after the bubble too. Both of their best players past their prime. Multiple contributors we're on the team for 1 year deals. Not a lot of young players with team friendly contracts.
AD 27
KCP 27
Caruso 26
Kuzma 25
THT 19
They had Green's expiring 15m, 1st round pick in 2020(and 2021), full MLE, BIE. That's a lot of flexibility
Honestly trading DG was probably their first mistake, not sure if that was motivated by LeBron n'camp or what.
But looking back perhaps trading AD when he was at the peak of his value would have been best, obviously that never would have happened.
I do think their one big mistake recently is picking THT over Caruso. But I sort of believe their motives were financial there and future outlook, which was stupid.
All that being said. The team was never really in a great roster at any point. LeBron and AD just were insane that first season together and Rondo played his best basketball in a decade. Everyone else was simply acceptable or worse.

RCM88x wrote:Mos_Heat wrote:RCM88x wrote:
As long as you have a boss you can be blameless.
I disagree they were in a good spot after the bubble too. Both of their best players past their prime. Multiple contributors we're on the team for 1 year deals. Not a lot of young players with team friendly contracts.
AD 27
KCP 27
Caruso 26
Kuzma 25
THT 19
They had Green's expiring 15m, 1st round pick in 2020(and 2021), full MLE, BIE. That's a lot of flexibility
Honestly trading DG was probably their first mistake, not sure if that was motivated by LeBron n'camp or what.
But looking back perhaps trading AD when he was at the peak of his value would have been best, obviously that never would have happened.
I do think their one big mistake recently is picking THT over Caruso. But I sort of believe their motives were financial there and future outlook, which was stupid.
All that being said. The team was never really in a great roster at any point. LeBron and AD just were insane that first season together and Rondo played his best basketball in a decade. Everyone else was simply acceptable or worse.
Obviously the Westbrook trade was terrible but he was being pushed to do something and it was the only something that seemed to be acceptable.
If it were me I would probably have just ran the team back w/ Caruso instead of THT and tried to add Monk and McGee instead of Dwight, Ariza, Bazemore and DAJ.
But again maybe those guys were chosen by someone else. Who really knows.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
zimpy27 wrote:Some people claiming they saw Rob Pelinka at Disneyland in the final hours of the trade deadline. This is too funny to be true..
picko wrote:Some of you just need to accept that LeBron can have an outstanding on-court basketball IQ and yet have a poor understanding of roster construction and fit. He isn't the only superstar who fits into that category. Jordan, if he had his way, would have traded himself out of about six-championships had he had any meaningful influence over Krause.
LeBron and Davis preferring Westbrook to Hield likely amounts to little more that: Westbrook is an all-star, Hield isn't. Westbrook can drop 30 point triple-doubles, Hield can't.
LeBron has enjoyed great team success in spite of his influence over the GMs that he's played with. He's enjoyed success because he is perhaps the best player in NBA history and that has been enough to offset a range of poor roster decisions across multiple teams. There is no evidence that he has unique insight into roster construction and we shouldn't assume that he does because he's a smart player on-court.
homecourtloss wrote:RCM88x wrote:Mos_Heat wrote:AD 27
KCP 27
Caruso 26
Kuzma 25
THT 19
They had Green's expiring 15m, 1st round pick in 2020(and 2021), full MLE, BIE. That's a lot of flexibility
Honestly trading DG was probably their first mistake, not sure if that was motivated by LeBron n'camp or what.
But looking back perhaps trading AD when he was at the peak of his value would have been best, obviously that never would have happened.
I do think their one big mistake recently is picking THT over Caruso. But I sort of believe their motives were financial there and future outlook, which was stupid.
All that being said. The team was never really in a great roster at any point. LeBron and AD just were insane that first season together and Rondo played his best basketball in a decade. Everyone else was simply acceptable or worse.
Obviously the Westbrook trade was terrible but he was being pushed to do something and it was the only something that seemed to be acceptable.
If it were me I would probably have just ran the team back w/ Caruso instead of THT and tried to add Monk and McGee instead of Dwight, Ariza, Bazemore and DAJ.
But again maybe those guys were chosen by someone else. Who really knows.
Was surprised at the DG trade but also knew that LeBron couldn’t run it back as the full time playmaker he did in 2020. Schroeder also had a good year by many metrics and looked to add defensively, so I see it as understandable. When healthy, last year’s Lakers’ team was the best in the NBA even with an underperforming AD.
Gasol, ostensibly Schroeder, and Wes Matthews (a big plus when playing with James) were good additions while it seemed that Kuzma might continue to improve after the bubble. Caruso, KCP, Kuzma, Gasol, Matthews, Schroeder, a supposedly improving THT, Trezz on offense during the regular season…this looked to be a great roster.
What happened was that they overreacted to a loss vs. a Suns team that turned out to be a championship quality team for two years straight at least. Up 2 games to 1, they were up 10 early in game 4, LeBron winds up a +6 fro that game, they miss some open threes, AD’s injured and the wheels fall off and then they completely blew it up after Dummimd didn’t add anything (as most on here knew he wouldn’t).
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:I don’t think LeBron was as good a point guard as Mo Williams for the point guard play not counting the scoring threat. In other words in a non shooting Rondo like role Mo Williams would be better than LeBron.

zimpy27 wrote:Hield would have been awful. Even worse than Westbrook.
falcolombardi wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Hield would have been awful. Even worse than Westbrook.
in hindsight derozan was actually the right trade despite how much it was dreaded here by most of us lol
davis/lebron/derozan/caruso/monk would be a surprisingly complete lineup

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.

falcolombardi wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Hield would have been awful. Even worse than Westbrook.
in hindsight derozan was actually the right trade despite how much it was dreaded here by most of us lol
davis/lebron/derozan/caruso/monk would be a surprisingly complete lineup

zimpy27 wrote:Do you guys think Westbrook+Jordan for KP+Powell would have been a good deal?
I would have done that.
falcolombardi wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Hield would have been awful. Even worse than Westbrook.
in hindsight derozan was actually the right trade despite how much it was dreaded here by most of us lol
davis/lebron/derozan/caruso/monk would be a surprisingly complete lineup