Slava wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:Slava wrote:
I do think they overreacted to last season and instead of chalking it down to injuries and bad luck from a short turnaround time and building on top of it, they decided to scrape the roster altogether and add a ball dominant player that LeBron always envisioned playing alongside since Wade in Miami and Kyrie in Cleveland. I don't think Rondo leaving had much to do with it, otherwise they'd have just offered him the full MLE and kept that core together. He signed for less than the MLE elsewhere.
The identity of the team being big, athletic and defensively strong was enabled by the fact that they could have a 6'8 PG and the shortest defender would be KCP at 6'4. If you go for a more traditional backcourt, you start moving away from that identity and then they doubled down on it by tryin to move AD to the 5 this season. The hiring of Fizdale probably has credence to that idea too, as he is often the vocal proponent of small ball line ups.
To me the Schroder trade made sense, but I immediately started to get nervous when he demanded (and was then granted) the starting PG spot. He's just not a good enough passer, decision-maker, or shooter to be a starter, let alone on a LeBron team. I was envisioning Wes replacing Green and then Schroder and Harrell combining to create an elite second unit which would take some offensive pressure off LeBron and AD. Starting Schroder just unbalanced the lineup and brutally exposed all of his flaws.
They didn't really have much of a choice, considering Vogel's defensive system needing a PG who can pressure the opposing ball handler, which Schröder is quite good at, and then LeBron's injury made it inevitable that he started as he became the sole offense creator.
Could have been this:
Caruso, KCP, LeBron, Davis, Gasol -- Schroeder, THT, Matthews, Markieff, Harrell
I wanted Caruso to start over Schroeder that whole year. LeBron going down was a problem though, Schroeder was leaned on hard then...






+
= 









