NoDopeOnSundays wrote:dukeknicksirish wrote:If we end up with pick 7-8, any chance we package IQ, #8 , Burks and 2023 NY 1st (protected top 14) to get Murray ?
Spurs look to want to rebuild, I’m just not sure what he’s worth to them .
No thanks, the Spurs are going to be in the lottery with Murray, they had DeRozan last year who looks like a new man not playing with Murray. Why give up 2 picks for someone who posts nice stats but doesn't impact winning in any way?
This is the worst Spurs team since a quarter-century ago (1997).
It's not a coincidence it happens to be the one where Dejounte Murray is "the man". You're just not going to win many games with Murray having such a high usage.
And it's not like he can be effective in an off-ball role. We saw the negative impact he had on DeRozan's game just last year. Murray arguably held back DeRozan with his lack of shooting.
Murray is the guard version of Randle, except he never had a season where he shot 40% from 3. Yes, he's a very good defender, but it doesn't make up for the fact he's a high-usage, low-efficiency offensive player who doesn't impact winning on the whole. Could he morph into a winning player? We'll see.
Trading for Murray would be a typical Knicks move. Moving two picks for him could be disaster.
Glad you see it too.
