Mid-range rangers

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
SUPERVILLAIN
Analyst
Posts: 3,252
And1: 12,453
Joined: Apr 08, 2020

Mid-range rangers 

Post#1 » by SUPERVILLAIN » Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:14 am

Create a line-up (PG-SG-SF-PF-C) consisting of the best mid-range scorers in the game. Make two versions of it.

Version 1: active players only
Version 2: all time
Young Stapler wrote:Completely off topic but SUPERVILLAIN got a crazy post/And1 ratio O_O

Just an observation. Carry on :usa:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2135964&p=94616946#p94616946
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,848
And1: 10,486
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#2 » by Statlanta » Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:28 am

Chris Paul, Devin Booker, Kawhi Leonard, Kevin Durant, Karl-Anthony Towns

Chris Paul, Michael Jordan, Alex English, Dirk Nowitzki, Bob McAdoo
Modern NBA footwork

GREY wrote: He steps back into another time zone
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,971
And1: 25,288
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#3 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 23, 2022 10:28 am

Active:

PG: Chris Paul
SG: DeMar DeRozan
SF: Kawhi Leonard
PF: Kevin Durant
C: Joel Embiid

All-time:

PG: Jerry West
SG: Michael Jordan
SF: Kevin Durant
PF: Dirk Nowitzki
C: Bob McAdoo
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,339
And1: 9,891
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#4 » by penbeast0 » Wed Feb 23, 2022 1:28 pm

70sFan wrote:Active:

PG: Chris Paul
SG: DeMar DeRozan
SF: Kawhi Leonard
PF: Kevin Durant
C: Joel Embiid

All-time:

PG: Jerry West
SG: Michael Jordan
SF: Kevin Durant
PF: Dirk Nowitzki
C: Bob McAdoo


I would say Oscar instead of Jerry for midrange; West was both a longer range shooter and more of a slasher than Oscar; Oscar got more of his work done in the midrange.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,971
And1: 25,288
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#5 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 23, 2022 1:30 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
70sFan wrote:Active:

PG: Chris Paul
SG: DeMar DeRozan
SF: Kawhi Leonard
PF: Kevin Durant
C: Joel Embiid

All-time:

PG: Jerry West
SG: Michael Jordan
SF: Kevin Durant
PF: Dirk Nowitzki
C: Bob McAdoo


I would say Oscar instead of Jerry for midrange; West was both a longer range shooter and more of a slasher than Oscar; Oscar got more of his work done in the midrange.

I had a hard time between Oscar and West, but I think Jerry was maybe a little bit better at creating his own shot from midrange. Very narrow gap between them though.
User avatar
SUPERVILLAIN
Analyst
Posts: 3,252
And1: 12,453
Joined: Apr 08, 2020

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#6 » by SUPERVILLAIN » Wed Feb 23, 2022 2:03 pm

Active
PG Chris Paul
SG DeMar DeRozan
SF Kawhi Leonard
PF Kevin Durant
C Joel Embiid

All-time
PG Chris Paul
SG Michael Jordan
SF Kevin Durant
PF Dirk Nowitzki
C LaMarcus Aldridge
Young Stapler wrote:Completely off topic but SUPERVILLAIN got a crazy post/And1 ratio O_O

Just an observation. Carry on :usa:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2135964&p=94616946#p94616946
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#7 » by Colbinii » Wed Feb 23, 2022 2:05 pm

Current Season/Active Players:

Chris Paul
Seth Curry
DeMar DeRozan
Kevin Durant
Joel Embiid
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,269
And1: 2,977
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#8 » by LukaTheGOAT » Wed Feb 23, 2022 6:30 pm

For current guys:

Chris Paul
Demar Derozan
Kawhi Leonard
Kevin Durant
Nikola Jokic
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,440
And1: 98,380
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#9 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Feb 23, 2022 6:34 pm

All-time:

Paul
Mike
Durant
Kawhi
Dirk
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,971
And1: 25,288
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#10 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 23, 2022 7:29 pm

For all-time teams I think people put too many modern players. Oldschool players used midrange game far more than they do now. I mean, someone like Jerry West or Oscar Robertson probably took 10+ midrange shots on average.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,113
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#11 » by falcolombardi » Wed Feb 23, 2022 7:41 pm

70sFan wrote:For all-time teams I think people put too many modern players. Oldschool players used midrange game far more than they do now. I mean, someone like Jerry West or Oscar Robertson probably took 10+ midrange shots on average.


Chris Paul has a career average of nearly 50% in midrange despite high volume and self creating most of his looks, is hard for me to imagine his percentages taking a dive with increased volume when his shots are already so hard to make

not having shooting data of west or Oscar is hard for me to go against paul who i have evidence of his insane efficiency

somethingh similar with Kevin durant whose midranges are for the most part barely affected by defense and he can shot them above 50% in his best seasons

i know this is unfair for old players but without having numbers i feel like i am guessing how good they actually were off reputation
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,971
And1: 25,288
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#12 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 23, 2022 7:47 pm

falcolombardi wrote:
70sFan wrote:For all-time teams I think people put too many modern players. Oldschool players used midrange game far more than they do now. I mean, someone like Jerry West or Oscar Robertson probably took 10+ midrange shots on average.


Chris Paul has a career average of nearly 50% in midrange despite high volume and self creating most of his looks, is hard for me to imagine his percentages taking a dive with increased volume when his shots are already so hard to make

not having shooting data of west or Oscar is hard for me to go against paul who i have evidence of his insane efficiency

somethingh similar with Kevin durant whose midranges are for the most part barely affected by defense and he can shot them above 50% in his best seasons

i know this is unfair for old players but without having numbers i feel like i am guessing how good they actually were off reputation

Actually, I don't mind using Paul at PG. Durant is tricky, because he has insane efficiency on very solid volume, but I'm sure there were plenty of forwards who were almost as efficient as him while shooting considerably more. Kawhi is similar case, except that he shots even less from midrange and I don't think he's good enough to put him there.
SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,574
And1: 3,251
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#13 » by SHAQ32 » Thu Feb 24, 2022 12:44 am

Mike Bibby
Rip Hamilton
Grant Hill
Carlos Boozer
Rik Smits
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,405
And1: 18,814
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#14 » by homecourtloss » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:42 pm

70sFan wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
70sFan wrote:For all-time teams I think people put too many modern players. Oldschool players used midrange game far more than they do now. I mean, someone like Jerry West or Oscar Robertson probably took 10+ midrange shots on average.


Chris Paul has a career average of nearly 50% in midrange despite high volume and self creating most of his looks, is hard for me to imagine his percentages taking a dive with increased volume when his shots are already so hard to make

not having shooting data of west or Oscar is hard for me to go against paul who i have evidence of his insane efficiency

somethingh similar with Kevin durant whose midranges are for the most part barely affected by defense and he can shot them above 50% in his best seasons

i know this is unfair for old players but without having numbers i feel like i am guessing how good they actually were off reputation

Actually, I don't mind using Paul at PG. Durant is tricky, because he has insane efficiency on very solid volume, but I'm sure there were plenty of forwards who were almost as efficient as him while shooting considerably more. Kawhi is similar case, except that he shots even less from midrange and I don't think he's good enough to put him there.


I see what ‘70sFan is saying though with CP3, there’s just too much data on his side. Interesting fact: CP3 this year is shooting the same from 10-16 ft (57.7%) as Westbrook did at the rim in 2017 (57.6%), and better than KLove did at the rim in any playoff run sans 2015’s incomplete run (35.7%, 48.9%, 57.1% in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively) which is absurd.

2015-2022: 51.8% from 10-16 ft, 49.7% from 16-23ft with six individual seasons above 50% from 10-16ft, five seasons above 50% from 16-23ft and these include seasons above 54%-55%, which is ludicrously good.

One name from the past not mentioned enough here is Walt Frazier with that beautiful lean in shot when going left. Walt put up some gaudy TS Added numbers shooting a lot of those shots.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,971
And1: 25,288
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#15 » by 70sFan » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:47 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
70sFan wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:
Chris Paul has a career average of nearly 50% in midrange despite high volume and self creating most of his looks, is hard for me to imagine his percentages taking a dive with increased volume when his shots are already so hard to make

not having shooting data of west or Oscar is hard for me to go against paul who i have evidence of his insane efficiency

somethingh similar with Kevin durant whose midranges are for the most part barely affected by defense and he can shot them above 50% in his best seasons

i know this is unfair for old players but without having numbers i feel like i am guessing how good they actually were off reputation

Actually, I don't mind using Paul at PG. Durant is tricky, because he has insane efficiency on very solid volume, but I'm sure there were plenty of forwards who were almost as efficient as him while shooting considerably more. Kawhi is similar case, except that he shots even less from midrange and I don't think he's good enough to put him there.


I see what ‘70sFan is saying though with CP3, there’s just too much data on his side. Interesting fact: CP3 this year is shooting the same from 10-16 ft (57.7%) as Westbrook did at the rim in 2017 (57.6%), and better than KLove did at the rim in any playoff run sans 2015’s incomplete run (35.7%, 48.9%, 57.1% in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively) which is absurd.

2015-2022: 51.8% from 10-16 ft, 49.7% from 16-23ft with six individual seasons above 50% from 10-16ft, five seasons above 50% from 16-23ft and these include seasons above 54%-55%, which is ludicrously good.

One name from the past not mentioned enough here is Walt Frazier with that beautiful lean in shot when going left. Walt put up some gaudy TS Added numbers shooting a lot of those shots.

Frazier is fantastic mention, he was such a good midrange shooter and most of his attempts were unassisted, contested turnarounds or pull-ups.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,405
And1: 18,814
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#16 » by homecourtloss » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:49 pm

SHAQ32 wrote:Mike Bibby
Rip Hamilton
Grant Hill
Carlos Boozer
Rik Smits


Bibby wasn’t a standout midrange shooter compared to names mentioned already.

Rip had good numbers from 10-16 feet, but not 16-23 ft

Boozer had some good seasons but again, not seasons as good as the names posted already had

Hill could of course get that shot off at will and got hot sometimes, but the overall numbers don’t look that good

Smits is a good choice here though not as good as current Embiid or Jokic
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,405
And1: 18,814
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#17 » by homecourtloss » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:53 pm

70sFan wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
70sFan wrote:Actually, I don't mind using Paul at PG. Durant is tricky, because he has insane efficiency on very solid volume, but I'm sure there were plenty of forwards who were almost as efficient as him while shooting considerably more. Kawhi is similar case, except that he shots even less from midrange and I don't think he's good enough to put him there.


I see what ‘70sFan is saying though with CP3, there’s just too much data on his side. Interesting fact: CP3 this year is shooting the same from 10-16 ft (57.7%) as Westbrook did at the rim in 2017 (57.6%), and better than KLove did at the rim in any playoff run sans 2015’s incomplete run (35.7%, 48.9%, 57.1% in 2016, 2017, 2018, respectively) which is absurd.

2015-2022: 51.8% from 10-16 ft, 49.7% from 16-23ft with six individual seasons above 50% from 10-16ft, five seasons above 50% from 16-23ft and these include seasons above 54%-55%, which is ludicrously good.

One name from the past not mentioned enough here is Walt Frazier with that beautiful lean in shot when going left. Walt put up some gaudy TS Added numbers shooting a lot of those shots.

Frazier is fantastic mention, he was such a good midrange shooter and most of his attempts were unassisted, contested turnarounds or pull-ups.


I was able to use your Clyde videos to convince some people about his ahead of his time game. Those were some really high difficulty shots with a lot of hand jostling pre shot. That was a beautiful jumper.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 3,140
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Mid-range rangers 

Post#18 » by Owly » Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:04 pm

At just shooters rather than scorers...

Some "by the numbers" names looking at combined 10-16 and 16-3pt. No accounting for sample, no accounting for volume (just each percentage separately, by st dev in a table of some good shooters). Modern pro numbers not recently updated and for earliest tracked players some combine tiny samples and a good chunk of them ('97) being where 16 to 3pt was shorter and at a glance that one year had some outlier highs so if that makes up a large part of that sample ...

Bogues - probably only ever taking them uncontested, no 3pt range, FT% a comparatively (within this company) pedestrian 0.827
Kerr
Bonner
Stockton
Nash
T Mills
Nowitzki
Seth Curry (heavy tilt to long mid-range)
Paul
Dumars
McCollum
Houston
Hornacek (heavy tilt to short mid-range)
Cassell
Curry
M Price (small samples)
Terry
Bass
Irving
Abdul-Rauf (small samples)
Ricky Pierce (small samples)

Return to Player Comparisons


cron