CobraCommander wrote:G35 wrote:bbalnation wrote:Fans stanning hard against millionaires for the benefit of billionaires is a concept in society I have a hard time grasping.
Even more so, in this thread, when it means that us as fans get to see our favorite players play for an extended period of time. Lol.
There is always a troll post about how fans should side with the players. Because the players care so much about the fans.....
I assume I’m one Of those trolls or Stans...but to me it not fans against players against owners against players....
I assume most of us are adults and work in for profit organizations. No organization can survive if there is an imbalance between company owner and workforce and if the employees don’t respect the customers and if customers don’t respect the employees of the company-
‘NBA players are quiting in the season after getting maxed and then getting traded. You think this can continue with no ramifications
Kobe and Jordan brought it nightly
This isn't owners against players. Some owners (lately) have brought a lot of positive contributions to the league and society. Imo, this is whats happening.
Its currently a 50/50 split, between 30 owners and 400+ players (with a lot going to max players). Theres a lot of staff that organizations (and the league) gotta employ as well to make the league enjoyable for us as fans.
Im grateful that NBA players are taking the lead in showcasing that within labor negotiations, in for-profit settings, negotiating for what is equitable for them as humans and players. They continue to negotiate for themselves first, and within the context of society (imo) whether intentionally or not : for employees.
This means that employees themselves who are working everyday are the ones that get to reap a larger amount of the profits thats incurred. Thats not too common in today's economy in most companies (but its also not totally uncommon).
In terms of the competition aspect, which i as a fan care about:
There are other ways to promote competitive parity in the league. There are other ways to promote players "bringing it every night", and optimizing the health of players (physical and mental) so that they can do so on a nightly basis, short, medium and long term. There are other ways to promote small markets, so that players don't always choose larger markets.
Employees renegotiating pay structure =/ parity, competition
Even if its chunked together, as it is now, in labor negotiations (imo)
From a contribution perspective, I dont think NBA owners will be getting 50% of profit in the next labor agreement. That certainly isnt a matter of a lack of respect: they don't do enough work to warrant that type of profit. It doesnt mean that they don't contribute anything. They don't contribute as much as players do though. Its worth noting they currently own 100% of the organization: meaning the long term asset remains theirs.
In for profit organizations, issuing shares are common for key employees that will elevate the organization - even if they're there temporarily (the Warriors have gone up over 1.5 billion since Steph who hasn't gotten anything for that long term gain, the Raptors gave Masai shares after the 2019 championship for a reason: MLSE saw a financial increase).




















