NyKnicks1714 wrote:He's right. The fact that the Lakers are awful this year doesn't change what happened last year. If every team was fully healthy last season, I think the Nets sweep the Lakers in the Finals.
Not sure. Before Paul got injured in game 1 for the second half, the teams were healthy, despite players from both teams being banged up as usual.
Suns win game 1 with a healthy AD and CP3 healthy for a half. Then in the second half they have AD healthy and Paul was useless, but hurting the team more than had they had Payne in.
Game 2 is close with Paul completely useless and not being guarded, allowing LA to double...this before LA went down. Game 3 Paul still useless and AD healthy. Lakers expected to win without CP3 healthy given the Suns had been bad the year before with Paul not there...26-39 before the bubble when teams they played were resting people and had all stars out.
In game 4 Paul started to feel better and AD played in the first half and was 2-9 and the Suns left at halftime....this a game in LA too so Suns were on pace to win on the road against a healthy AD with the Lakers to tie it up and have Paul healthy, where they had beaten LA in the series so far when both were healthy (game 1 when Paul was healthy for only a half, and the first half of game 4).
Lakers can't ever stay healthy though last year or this year so expecting them ever to be healthy doesn't matter. We can talk all day about other teams that would have won past finals if players didn't get injured, but nothing is guaranteed and injuries are a part of the game.
But had neither Paul or AD gotten injured, the Lakers had a chance, but the Suns still likely win. We will see this year if the Lakers are healthy in the playoffs and they meet again.