Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Adams Traded to Raiders for 2022 1st and 2nd Rd Picks

Post #1041 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:56 pm

Landry isn't a #1 caliber WR. He'd be a nice possession type #2, though.

Matches Malone · Post #1042 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:59 pm

Conflicting reports on Landry and Packers interest.

Read on Twitter

LittleRooster · Post #1043 » by **LittleRooster** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:08 pm

Not sure I see the fit for Landry here

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Matches Malone · Post #1044 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:08 pm

Read on Twitter

WeekapaugGroove · Post #1045 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:09 pm

I'm not sure Landry is really the type of number 2 I'd want with Adams. I'd rather have field stretcher over a possession type in that role. Also I'm not sure of Landry's run blocking but any possession type wr in this O needs to be able to block.

Id be fine finding better versions of them but stylistically MVS and Lazard really fit the profiles of what you would want with Adams. A take the top off outside guy and a quasi TE possession type who cracks down with authority in the run game from the slot.

Add in a gadget type and that's the ideal mix of 4 wrs IMO.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

Post #1046 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:46 pm

Sucks that we can't count on last year's third rounder.

WRau1 · Post #1047 » by **WRau1** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:50 pm

Has there been any reliable news on Rodger's new deal?

Post #1048 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:52 pm

Read on Twitter

zmanishere11 · Post #1049 » by **zmanishere11** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:56 pm

WRau1 wrote:Has there been any reliable news on Rodger's new deal?

He hasn't signed anything yet. No doubt they're trying to make it work with he and Davante. D may be the problem here

Daver · Post #1050 » by **Daver** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:11 pm

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Turner was a pretty obvious cut. Don't get the surprise over it.

Hope I'm wrong, but the Landry interest tells me they're already assuming Davante is gone.

Yeah got to thank Landry would be #1 and hope Rodgers is ok with him and some high-profile draft picks at WR.

Watch on YouTube

How bout landry and allen robinson

M-C-G · Post #1051 » by **M-C-G** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:11 pm

Will Fuller on a 1 year 3M kind of prove it deal would be ideal

Matches Malone · Post #1052 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:27 pm

Read on Twitter

Ron Swanson · Post #1053 » by **Ron Swanson** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:32 pm

Lol yeah, Campbell's gone. Time for Plan B at inside-linebacker.

Treebeard · Post #1054 » by **Treebeard** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:35 pm

No surprise if Campbell goes. He bet on himself with two (comparatively) low-buck prove-it deals. The guys going to cash in now while he can and who can blame him?

Post #1055 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:41 pm

We need to draft the next Campbell, which we've shown we haven't been able to do at the position since Ray Nitschke

stillgotgame · Post #1056 » by **stillgotgame** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:44 pm

Daver wrote:
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Turner was a pretty obvious cut. Don't get the surprise over it.

Hope I'm wrong, but the Landry interest tells me they're already assuming Davante is gone.

Yeah got to thank Landry would be #1 and hope Rodgers is ok with him and some high-profile draft picks at WR.

Watch on YouTube

How bout landry and allen robinson

This is a really random idea but they’d make a good combo. Devante wants so much money that the 2 of them combined would be cheaper than Devante and MVS. Crazy

M-C-G · Post #1057 » by **M-C-G** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:51 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:We need to draft the next Campbell, which we've shown we haven't been able to do at the position since Ray Nitschke

Yep, when you sign the highest paid QB, DT, WR, LT in the league and certainly will be paying the highest CB in the league and who knows what Gary ends up getting, you are going to have a tough time filling spots. Campbell was an anomaly but this class seems like we may be able to grab a starter in the 3rd or 4th.

Treebeard · Post #1058 » by **Treebeard** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:58 pm

I'd also like to hear a qualified medical update on Bakh and Jenkins, by far the Packs two best O-Linemen. Bakh's bumps and setbacks in recovery are concerning. Jenkins injury was serious, so where does he stand?

MoMM · Post #1059 » by **MoMM** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:18 pm

M-C-G wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:We need to draft the next Campbell, which we've shown we haven't been able to do at the position since Ray Nitschke

Yep, when you sign the highest paid QB, DT, WR, LT in the league and certainly will be paying the highest CB in the league and who knows what Gary ends up getting, you are going to have a tough time filling spots.

Sometimes having the best player in a position is not good if it's not an impact position. Kenny and David are good, but they don't impact the game as much as their salaries require (not their fault). Sometimes it's better to have 2 above average starters than relying in only 1 star.

Post #1060 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:24 pm

I don't see a resolution to this Adams issue that doesn't result in a trade.