players better in defense than they look

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,113
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

players better in defense than they look 

Post#1 » by falcolombardi » Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:37 pm

I thought about this after seeing that ginobili had some ridiculous defensive plus minus stats (drapm) in his prime when i had never tought of him as an elite guard defender

which other players without elite physical tools or without the "look" (as in huge steals/blocks, crazy 1vs1 lockdowns) were actually fantastic or elite defenders?

which players seem better defenders thsn they actually were impact wise?
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,428
And1: 3,407
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#2 » by parsnips33 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 4:41 pm

I honestly think (pre-injury) Klay has become an underrated defender at this point. He didn't rack up steals/blocks, and he certainly wasn't as good as Draymond/Iguodala were, but having the foot speed to stay in front of PGs most nights and the strength/size to switch 1-4 comfortably made him a pretty useful defender I think
Peregrine01
Head Coach
Posts: 6,704
And1: 7,629
Joined: Sep 12, 2012

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#3 » by Peregrine01 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 5:30 pm

Jokic this year. He has quietly made a giant leap.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,065
And1: 6,728
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#4 » by Jaivl » Fri Mar 18, 2022 5:41 pm

<- this guy
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,336
And1: 9,890
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 5:46 pm

Muggsy Bogues. At 5'3, you wonder if he could guard anyone, I mean Spud Webb has a 3 inch height advantage on him. But he was thick, strong, and superquick (else he wouldn't have had a shot at the NBA no matter how skilled) and he worked at being a annoying pest defensively. Sure, he wasn't going to block your shot, but Kenny Anderson said he was the guy he hatest most to play because no dribble was safe.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
GSP
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 16,036
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
     

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#6 » by GSP » Fri Mar 18, 2022 5:57 pm

Sikma
Jason Collins
Nene
Millsap
Tatum
User avatar
KobesScarf
Veteran
Posts: 2,855
And1: 604
Joined: Jul 17, 2016
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#7 » by KobesScarf » Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:00 pm

Ginobili had so many crazy defensive highlights why wouldn't you think he was a great defender
SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,572
And1: 3,246
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#8 » by SHAQ32 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 6:08 pm

PJ Tucker, I guess
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 449
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#9 » by feyki » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:00 pm

Wes Unseld.
Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,969
And1: 25,285
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#10 » by 70sFan » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:07 pm

Dave DeBusschere is the first option here. He wasn't huge or long and his athletic ability isn't very pronounced for untrained eye.

He's on the short list of the greatest defenders ever at his positon. There were not many players I would count more on than him on defensive end.
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#11 » by spanishninja » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:11 pm

parsnips33 wrote:I honestly think (pre-injury) Klay has become an underrated defender at this point. He didn't rack up steals/blocks, and he certainly wasn't as good as Draymond/Iguodala were, but having the foot speed to stay in front of PGs most nights and the strength/size to switch 1-4 comfortably made him a pretty useful defender I think


I don't Klay was underrated. He was regarded as the best two-way SG in the league, which is praise enough. He was not an elite defender as he was still prone to limitations in awareness and reading plays. Still a good defender pre-injury though.
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,113
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#12 » by falcolombardi » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:22 pm

KobesScarf wrote:Ginobili had so many crazy defensive highlights why wouldn't you think he was a great defender


it was my fault of assuming a not hyper athletic,/super long or tall perimeter defender is probably not in the level of great defenders who have those physical tools
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,428
And1: 3,407
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#13 » by parsnips33 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:47 pm

spanishninja wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:I honestly think (pre-injury) Klay has become an underrated defender at this point. He didn't rack up steals/blocks, and he certainly wasn't as good as Draymond/Iguodala were, but having the foot speed to stay in front of PGs most nights and the strength/size to switch 1-4 comfortably made him a pretty useful defender I think


I don't Klay was underrated. He was regarded as the best two-way SG in the league, which is praise enough. He was not an elite defender as he was still prone to limitations in awareness and reading plays. Still a good defender pre-injury though.


I think it's fair to say he overrated at the height of the Warriors doing their thing, but I think the pendulum has swung back too far, at least on this board IMO
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#14 » by spanishninja » Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:23 pm

parsnips33 wrote:
spanishninja wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:I honestly think (pre-injury) Klay has become an underrated defender at this point. He didn't rack up steals/blocks, and he certainly wasn't as good as Draymond/Iguodala were, but having the foot speed to stay in front of PGs most nights and the strength/size to switch 1-4 comfortably made him a pretty useful defender I think


I don't Klay was underrated. He was regarded as the best two-way SG in the league, which is praise enough. He was not an elite defender as he was still prone to limitations in awareness and reading plays. Still a good defender pre-injury though.


I think it's fair to say he overrated at the height of the Warriors doing their thing, but I think the pendulum has swung back too far, at least on this board IMO


swung back how? up until his return, he still had the same kind of reputation as a defender as he did pre-injury, even with the uncertainty about how much of that might be impacted by the two major leg injuries. I certainly did not think he was a bum on defense until he actually came back anyway.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#15 » by Colbinii » Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:33 pm

D'Angelo Williams this year
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,113
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#16 » by falcolombardi » Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:39 pm

parsnips33 wrote:
spanishninja wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:I honestly think (pre-injury) Klay has become an underrated defender at this point. He didn't rack up steals/blocks, and he certainly wasn't as good as Draymond/Iguodala were, but having the foot speed to stay in front of PGs most nights and the strength/size to switch 1-4 comfortably made him a pretty useful defender I think


I don't Klay was underrated. He was regarded as the best two-way SG in the league, which is praise enough. He was not an elite defender as he was still prone to limitations in awareness and reading plays. Still a good defender pre-injury though.


I think it's fair to say he overrated at the height of the Warriors doing their thing, but I think the pendulum has swung back too far, at least on this board IMO


i think the biggest issue with klay is that hisw apparent impact per advanced stats or simply team defensive improvement in warriors defense doesnt seem in line with his reputation or "eye test"

it may be noise, but klay seems one of those guys whose strong 1vs1 defense makes them seem more impactful than they are
dygaction
General Manager
Posts: 7,626
And1: 4,915
Joined: Sep 20, 2015
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#17 » by dygaction » Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:55 pm

Doncic and Jokic
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,428
And1: 3,407
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#18 » by parsnips33 » Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:18 pm

spanishninja wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:
spanishninja wrote:
I don't Klay was underrated. He was regarded as the best two-way SG in the league, which is praise enough. He was not an elite defender as he was still prone to limitations in awareness and reading plays. Still a good defender pre-injury though.


I think it's fair to say he overrated at the height of the Warriors doing their thing, but I think the pendulum has swung back too far, at least on this board IMO


swung back how? up until his return, he still had the same kind of reputation as a defender as he did pre-injury, even with the uncertainty about how much of that might be impacted by the two major leg injuries. I certainly did not think he was a bum on defense until he actually came back anyway.


I think the point I'm trying to make is broader than just Klay.

There's guys that are really good at defense because they are captial-D Disruptive - think Draymond or Giannis or Thybulle. Their impact on the defense is active, they usually create a lot of deflections/turnovers, they are as liable to make a play off the ball as they are on it.

Then there are guys like Klay. I think PJ Tucker also falls into this same type of category. The best way I can think to describe their defense is Additive, although that doesn't feel precise enough. They are positionally sound, positionally versatile, strong enough to not be easily moved, and rarely make mistakes on the defensive end. I don't think they are generally as impactful as Disruptive players, and they likely are not anchoring a defense on their own. But I do think the value of this type of defender can be more easily overlooked.
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#19 » by spanishninja » Fri Mar 18, 2022 9:49 pm

parsnips33 wrote:
spanishninja wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:
I think it's fair to say he overrated at the height of the Warriors doing their thing, but I think the pendulum has swung back too far, at least on this board IMO


swung back how? up until his return, he still had the same kind of reputation as a defender as he did pre-injury, even with the uncertainty about how much of that might be impacted by the two major leg injuries. I certainly did not think he was a bum on defense until he actually came back anyway.


I think the point I'm trying to make is broader than just Klay.

There's guys that are really good at defense because they are captial-D Disruptive - think Draymond or Giannis or Thybulle. Their impact on the defense is active, they usually create a lot of deflections/turnovers, they are as liable to make a play off the ball as they are on it.

Then there are guys like Klay. I think PJ Tucker also falls into this same type of category. The best way I can think to describe their defense is Additive, although that doesn't feel precise enough. They are positionally sound, positionally versatile, strong enough to not be easily moved, and rarely make mistakes on the defensive end. I don't think they are generally as impactful as Disruptive players, and they likely are not anchoring a defense on their own. But I do think the value of this type of defender can be more easily overlooked.


yeah that makes sense. Somebody who is earlier in the trajectory but is gonna be in the same overlooked category is Booker. people who watch him play are seeing a lot of the same things you said about Klay, although he is not on that level yet.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,749
And1: 16,380
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: players better in defense than they look 

Post#20 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:06 pm

Pau's defensive impact on the Lakers is probably underrated. Dirk was subtly decent I believe. I'm not sure Love was ever as bad as people think. I'm not sure he could have played on 2016 Cavs playoff defense if he was.
Liberate The Zoomers

Return to Player Comparisons