wco81 wrote:CrimsonCrew wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:I must be less optimistic than the rest of you.
I imagine the Colts are going to prefer Ryan.
Falcons probably won't go for Jimmy.
At this point I'm praying Carolina comes through and takes Jimmy.
Is Ryan going anywhere now that Atlanta missed out on Watson? The Colts remain the most logical landing spot, as they're actually a playoff contender with even passable QB play. But they may be content to wait on a Mariota or Fitzpatrick instead of coughing up picks for Jimmy.
Wonder if Ryan could have the same kind of impact as Stafford did on the Rams last year.
Problem is the 49ers don't have the kind of weapons as the Rams for downfield threats, though maybe they would have made better use of Kittle.
Like I said a couple of years ago, Mike Lombardi said the 49ers should trade for Stafford.
Probably would have cost a lot less than what they traded away for Lance.
Not convinced that we don't have comparable downfield threats. Granted our receivers aren't going to challenge our Olympic 4x100 team, but their speed is certainly comparable to the Rams. Looking at 40 times, Deebo (4.48) and Aiyuk (4.5) are faster than Woods (4.51) and Kupp (4.62) and Kittle (4.52) is much faster than Higbee (4.62). (note: not including OBJ since he is not, as of this writing, under contract with the Rams). The difference is that Jimmy doesn't have the arm strength to throw deep (either straight flies and certainly not deep outs) nor did he have the time to throw those longer routes. Lance has the arm strength but it is very questionable whether our O-line can give him enough time for that with Brunskill and Compton largely impersonating matadors against strong rushers. We haven't replaced Brunskill (yet) and McGlinchey is coming off an injury, plus we have a big question mark at LG. I think our O-line will be a bigger factor in eliminating all deep routes from our playbook rather than our receivers.