The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- Clay Davis
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,988
- And1: 7,273
- Joined: Nov 06, 2013
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
The only thing better than the Raptors beating other teams is doubters getting dunked on.

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- WaltFrazier
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,491
- And1: 31,116
- Joined: Jan 21, 2006
- Location: Ontario Canada
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Mehar wrote:I was in favour of taking Suggs over Barnes. Glad Scottie was the pick looking in hindsight. That being said, Suggs as a Raptor would be a different player than the one playing in Orlando; especially with Toronto's better development. The Magic have him primarily as a shooting guard, when he should really be the Point Guard with the ball in his hands. However, the Magic have Anthony at the Point. Watching him play a couple of games in Orlando, his defense had been solid, but he looks much better when he has the ball in his hands when Anthony is not on the court. He is 6 foot 3 (6 foot 5 in shoes), but his game does not translate well as a Shooting Guard. I think the Magic should deal Anthony in the off-season, since both guys do not fit well together on the court.
Yes he'd have been a good backcourt partner with Fred, and a 3 man backcourt with Gary n Fred. Would have been great insurance for Fred's injuries, and benefitted from playing with our more talented roster.
Of course we love Scottie now but Suggs woulda been ok too. And we still don't have that third guard.
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,194
- And1: 13,812
- Joined: Apr 10, 2021
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
WaltFrazier wrote:Mehar wrote:I was in favour of taking Suggs over Barnes. Glad Scottie was the pick looking in hindsight. That being said, Suggs as a Raptor would be a different player than the one playing in Orlando; especially with Toronto's better development. The Magic have him primarily as a shooting guard, when he should really be the Point Guard with the ball in his hands. However, the Magic have Anthony at the Point. Watching him play a couple of games in Orlando, his defense had been solid, but he looks much better when he has the ball in his hands when Anthony is not on the court. He is 6 foot 3 (6 foot 5 in shoes), but his game does not translate well as a Shooting Guard. I think the Magic should deal Anthony in the off-season, since both guys do not fit well together on the court.
Yes he'd have been a good backcourt partner with Fred, and a 3 man backcourt with Gary n Fred. Would have been great insurance for Fred's injuries, and benefitted from playing with our more talented roster.
Of course we love Scottie now but Suggs woulda been ok too. And we still don't have that third guard.
It wouldn’t have been okay. It would’ve been a disaster. Scottie has superstar potential while Suggs has been the most disappointing rookie in the top 8. It would’ve set this franchise back years. That’s not okay. Lol.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
- WaltFrazier
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,491
- And1: 31,116
- Joined: Jan 21, 2006
- Location: Ontario Canada
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
Los_29 wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Mehar wrote:I was in favour of taking Suggs over Barnes. Glad Scottie was the pick looking in hindsight. That being said, Suggs as a Raptor would be a different player than the one playing in Orlando; especially with Toronto's better development. The Magic have him primarily as a shooting guard, when he should really be the Point Guard with the ball in his hands. However, the Magic have Anthony at the Point. Watching him play a couple of games in Orlando, his defense had been solid, but he looks much better when he has the ball in his hands when Anthony is not on the court. He is 6 foot 3 (6 foot 5 in shoes), but his game does not translate well as a Shooting Guard. I think the Magic should deal Anthony in the off-season, since both guys do not fit well together on the court.
Yes he'd have been a good backcourt partner with Fred, and a 3 man backcourt with Gary n Fred. Would have been great insurance for Fred's injuries, and benefitted from playing with our more talented roster.
Of course we love Scottie now but Suggs woulda been ok too. And we still don't have that third guard.
It wouldn’t have been okay. It would’ve been a disaster. Scottie has superstar potential while Suggs has been the most disappointing rookie in the top 8. It would’ve set this franchise back years. That’s not okay. Lol.
Suggs on the Raptors would've been night and day from him on the Magic. A guy like Cunningham shows well on a bad team but Suggs more subtle intangible skills are better on a talented winning team. Not saying as good as Barnes of course.
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,194
- And1: 13,812
- Joined: Apr 10, 2021
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
WaltFrazier wrote:Los_29 wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:Yes he'd have been a good backcourt partner with Fred, and a 3 man backcourt with Gary n Fred. Would have been great insurance for Fred's injuries, and benefitted from playing with our more talented roster.
Of course we love Scottie now but Suggs woulda been ok too. And we still don't have that third guard.
It wouldn’t have been okay. It would’ve been a disaster. Scottie has superstar potential while Suggs has been the most disappointing rookie in the top 8. It would’ve set this franchise back years. That’s not okay. Lol.
Suggs on the Raptors would've been night and day from him on the Magic. A guy like Cunningham shows well on a bad team but Suggs more subtle intangible skills are better on a talented winning team. Not saying as good as Barnes of course.
Yeah he would be better but it still would’ve been a disaster had we drafted him over Scottie.
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,323
- And1: 9,892
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,886
- And1: 1,280
- Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
126 people voted for Suggs. 

Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,194
- And1: 13,812
- Joined: Apr 10, 2021
Re: The too early Suggs vs. Barnes thread
positivetension wrote:126 people voted for Suggs.
"The gift that keeps on giving" has been the main theme of this season. So many bad takes and they have all aged like milk.