players who were too passive for their talent

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,113
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#1 » by falcolombardi » Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:50 am

who are guys who really had the skill and talent ti have a more Prominent role, take more shots, do more in their offenses

but whether from lack of opportunity or a more "passive" personality settled into smaller or more specialized roles

basically the opposite of the guys who think they are stars and take more shots that their skill should Allow
jalengreen
Starter
Posts: 2,184
And1: 1,943
Joined: Aug 09, 2021
   

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#2 » by jalengreen » Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:56 am

i think nash would be taking more shots in today's league. efficiency speaks for itself and although it would likely drop with higher volume, it would definitely still be above league avg
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#3 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Fri Mar 25, 2022 5:14 am

James Worthy should have been a better rebounder.
User avatar
The High Cyde
General Manager
Posts: 8,208
And1: 15,003
Joined: Jun 06, 2014
Location: Elbaf
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#4 » by The High Cyde » Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:31 am

Nic Batum, but due to injuries

Vince slowly over time, as gracefully as they come and go
Image
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,946
And1: 25,271
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#5 » by 70sFan » Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:09 am

Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.
User avatar
KobesScarf
Veteran
Posts: 2,855
And1: 604
Joined: Jul 17, 2016
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#6 » by KobesScarf » Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:43 am

Derrick Coleman
CumberlandPosey
Rookie
Posts: 1,088
And1: 663
Joined: Apr 12, 2014
Location: Herkimer YMCA

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#7 » by CumberlandPosey » Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:21 am

tony snell.i feel he should at least score a single point once in a while.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,787
And1: 1,793
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#8 » by f4p » Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:26 am

jeff teague. was super quick and could seemingly get in the paint when he wanted, while having a decent jump shot, and yet you'd go 2 quarters of a game where you barely noticed him on the court and he'd just settle for his usual 15-17 ppg. could have easily had some 20 ppg seasons.
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 449
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#9 » by feyki » Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:25 pm

70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Anthony Davis,Kobe because of the triangle,Garnett on the rim protection,Baron Davis and Conley.
Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,946
And1: 25,271
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#10 » by 70sFan » Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:33 pm

feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Really? I don't think he lacked anything to be consistent 20+ ppg scorer.
jasonxxx102
Analyst
Posts: 3,444
And1: 3,571
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#11 » by jasonxxx102 » Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:40 pm

Ben Simmons.

The guy had perennial MVP talent if he just took the game seriously.
76ciology wrote:Wouldn't Edey have a better chance of winning the scoring battle against Tatum in the post after a switch than Tatum shooting over Edey's 9'6" standing reach?
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
bluemj32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,706
And1: 1,442
Joined: Jul 15, 2010

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#12 » by bluemj32 » Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:45 pm

Lamar Odem....watch the guy in college at Rhode Island and thought he was one of the most unique players I've seen. 6'10 and could handle the ball as a point forward, score, okay d when he wanted to.
If he had more of a mean streak guy would have been an all star every year. He easily had HOF talent, but effort and consistency wasn't there.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 449
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#13 » by feyki » Fri Mar 25, 2022 2:06 pm

70sFan wrote:
feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Really? I don't think he lacked anything to be consistent 20+ ppg scorer.


The footwork and fundemental where he seperate from KAJ. 20 PPG is not hard, though, even when a player in the finisher role for Gilmore kind of nature talent.
Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”
User avatar
henshao
Pro Prospect
Posts: 942
And1: 448
Joined: Jul 29, 2018

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#14 » by henshao » Fri Mar 25, 2022 2:13 pm

first guy who comes to mind for me is John Stockton. With his shooting ability and the rebounding he had in Eaton/Malone he absolutely could (should?) have averaged another 8ppg easily
Im Your Father
Senior
Posts: 581
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 17, 2014

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#15 » by Im Your Father » Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:38 pm

feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Anthony Davis,Kobe because of the triangle,Garnett on the rim protection,Baron Davis and Conley.


Kobe Bryant was a lot of things, but I don't think passive was one of them.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,335
And1: 9,890
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#16 » by penbeast0 » Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:42 pm

Not sure why you think Eaton was a good rebounder. Despite being right under the basket, his career rebound rate is only 15. Greg Ostertag was a better rebounder. Eaton could block shots, that was pretty much his only talent other than size and in his best season, Stockton was a rookie backing up Ricky Green.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#17 » by Colbinii » Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:45 pm

Chauncey Billups
John Stockton
Mark Price
Steve Nash
Chris Paul
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,335
And1: 9,890
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#18 » by penbeast0 » Fri Mar 25, 2022 3:45 pm

feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Anthony Davis,Kobe because of the triangle,Garnett on the rim protection,Baron Davis and Conley.


Artis was as skilled as Shaq and a better shooter though not as good passing out of the post. His passivity was something that was widely criticized when he was playing.

I wouldn't call any of the 5 guys you mention passive, if anything Kobe and Baron go in the OP's other category, thought they were better than they were and called their own numbers too often.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,946
And1: 25,271
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#19 » by 70sFan » Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:01 pm

feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:
feyki wrote:
He was not skilled.

Really? I don't think he lacked anything to be consistent 20+ ppg scorer.


The footwork and fundemental where he seperate from KAJ. 20 PPG is not hard, though, even when a player in the finisher role for Gilmore kind of nature talent.

What fundamentals did Gilmore lack in his prime?
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 449
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: players who were too passive for their talent 

Post#20 » by feyki » Fri Mar 25, 2022 5:02 pm

Im Your Father wrote:
feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Anthony Davis,Kobe because of the triangle,Garnett on the rim protection,Baron Davis and Conley.


Kobe Bryant was a lot of things, but I don't think passive was one of them.


Not saying should be like Lebron,Harden,Doncic; but at least he could be ball-dominator as high as Wade/T-Mac.

70sFan wrote:
feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Really? I don't think he lacked anything to be consistent 20+ ppg scorer.


The footwork and fundemental where he seperate from KAJ. 20 PPG is not hard, though, even when a player in the finisher role for Gilmore kind of nature talent.

What fundamentals did Gilmore lack in his prime?


Generally, footworks.


penbeast0 wrote:
feyki wrote:
70sFan wrote:Artis Gilmore is the guy for this thread.


He was not skilled.

Anthony Davis,Kobe because of the triangle,Garnett on the rim protection,Baron Davis and Conley.


Artis was as skilled as Shaq and a better shooter though not as good passing out of the post. His passivity was something that was widely criticized when he was playing.


Your this comment is luckless at the best. Shaq was the most skilled center ever, maybe beside of Hakeem. Saying a player couldn't even turnaround in the post effectively more skilled than a player who consistently finished the offences with classy spin moves, is insane.

Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”

Return to Player Comparisons