AbeVigodaLive wrote:kuclas wrote:Why do the sixers get grief for tanking. When okc has now done muti year tanks twice. (2006-2008/9)
And 2020-current. Really they meant to tank 2019-2020 but Chris Paul happened to be healthy that season.
Marketing/PR?
Philadelphia was quite open, and almost even smug, about their "genius" tanking idea. OKC has largely kept it quiet other than having to publicly announce the latest "injury" to the league office.
The bonuses for OKC is that they've done well enough on other trades that Presti seems to be a bit untouchable right now... and the fanbase knows winning almost exclusively... so they're probably willing to be more patient with it right now that other fans.
Yup, Philadelphia (i) didn't offer any plausible deniability; (ii) went beyond normal tanking and had rosters at the beginning of the season that lacked NBA ability; (iii) acted like they were geniuses for trying to lose games; and (iv) seemed open to doing a gutter rebuild for ten years if that is what it took to land a superstar. The union hated it because their members couldn't get jobs because they were too good. The others owners and players hated because the Sixers were gutting their local revenue and just being welfare cheats living on national tv revenue:
According to a recent Inquirer report, the Sixers averaged only 23,000 viewers during their miserable 18-win season in 2014-15. Keep in mind Philadelphia is the nation’s fourth-largest market with roughly 2.96 million homes featuring TV sets.
“Those numbers are embarrassing,” former CBS Sports president turned media consultant Neal Pilson told the Inquirer’s Bob Fernandez, “no question about it.”
. . .
What the Sixers lose in ticket and merchandise sales and local TV ratings — the only avenues fans really have to voice their frustration with the team’s approach — the franchise will attempt to offset with a league-minimum salary and the NBA’s $24 billion national TV broadcast partnership, which begins with the 2016-17 campaign.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/bp/philadelphia-s--embarrassing--tv-viewership-could-barely-fill-76ers--stadium-220939908.htmlSimply put this is enormously damaging and unlike anything the NBA had ever seen.
1. Sixers weren't bothering to generate revenue costing the players and other owners money.
2. Sixers actions discouraged support for revenue sharing which divides the owners and makes the CBA unworkable.
3. Players felt like the Sixers were establishing a weird missing middle cass jobs. If you weren't good enough to be a superstar, off a rookie contract but could still help a team win the Sixers were saying you shouldn't be in the NBA.
4. Top draft picks are a zero sum competition. Philly gutting the roster to that extent put pressure on other teams to do the same. The NBA feared a spiral in which it opened the season with 5-6 teams gunning for 75+ losses.
Basketball is naturally a low level parity sport. What the Sixers were saying in essence is don't try to win; don't try to generate revenue; keep losing games until you land a top prospect.