Jimmit79 wrote:I think a RJ for Brunson trade would be great Knicks get a better player for 80/4 compared to paying RJ 181/5 win win situation.
I love you man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Jimmit79 wrote:I think a RJ for Brunson trade would be great Knicks get a better player for 80/4 compared to paying RJ 181/5 win win situation.
TheGreenArrow wrote:Jimmit79 wrote:I think a RJ for Brunson trade would be great Knicks get a better player for 80/4 compared to paying RJ 181/5 win win situation.
![]()
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love you man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
omerome wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
We draft one in 2023 when we're in the lottery.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
8516knicks wrote:omerome wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
We draft one in 2023 when we're in the lottery.
What? And pass on a power forward?![]()
HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
I think that he's already shown that he can. Is he a finished product? No. But where are we going anytime soon? Let him grow and make mistakes with the rest of the young core. I mean, isn't that the point (no pun intended)?
Clyde_Style wrote:Jalen Bruson Obsession is my favorite cologne
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
I think that he's already shown that he can. Is he a finished product? No. But where are we going anytime soon? Let him grow and make mistakes with the rest of the young core. I mean, isn't that the point (no pun intended)?
You guys keep saying he's shown that he can, yeah against second units. There's 1 massive problem with his game that some of you don't seem to see, it's that he can't and doesn't get to the rim. How many starting PGs in the league don't put pressure on the rim?
HarthorneWingo wrote:8516knicks wrote:omerome wrote:We draft one in 2023 when we're in the lottery.
What? And pass on a power forward?![]()
If we don't sign Mitch, I'd like to grab either Duren or Mark Williams.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
BBALLER4FR wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
I think that he's already shown that he can. Is he a finished product? No. But where are we going anytime soon? Let him grow and make mistakes with the rest of the young core. I mean, isn't that the point (no pun intended)?
You guys keep saying he's shown that he can, yeah against second units. There's 1 massive problem with his game that some of you don't seem to see, it's that he can't and doesn't get to the rim. How many starting PGs in the league don't put pressure on the rim?
He would have been fine if our coach gave him a starting role. I have no doubts he would have struggled but Quickly would have recognized it, put in work and we'd be good. But Thibs spent the last 2 season insisting Quickley couldn't be a starter. Quick not having experience against starters doesn't mean he can't be successful there. It means our coach has determined he won't get a chance to prove it.
KnixtapeH20 wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
Who cares we're not going anywhere next season anyway, it's about development. If he can't, that answers that question and you look elsewhere. He's shown he can worst case scenario do an ok job running point.... Even worst case scenario he's our best option. He's far from a worst case scenario, dont sleep on quick.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
Same ppl that call out IQ isn't a PG are the same ppl who say RJ is not finished product he's only 21. I guess 22 years old IQ has reached his ceiling lol.HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Now the Pacers are entering the Jalen Brunson sweepstakes. That means we’re going to have to get into a bidding war to secure his services.
I’d rather just go with IQ.
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
I think that he's already shown that he can. Is he a finished product? No. But where are we going anytime soon? Let him grow and make mistakes with the rest of the young core. I mean, isn't that the point (no pun intended)?
Jimmit79 wrote:Same ppl that call out IQ isn't a PG are the same ppl who say RJ is not finished product he's only 21. I guess 22 years old IQ has reached his ceiling lol.HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
And what happens if he can't run PG, then what?
I think that he's already shown that he can. Is he a finished product? No. But where are we going anytime soon? Let him grow and make mistakes with the rest of the young core. I mean, isn't that the point (no pun intended)?