tripa wrote:Embiid flopping everywhere as usual
i mean if Embiid played for the Raptors, ya i'd turn a blind eye...
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
tripa wrote:Embiid flopping everywhere as usual
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.


mksp wrote:Duffman100 wrote:mksp wrote:Y’all are ready to throw a parade for winning the first half my goodness.
We can remember what a parade is. This isn’t it.
*
Duffman100 wrote:mksp wrote:Y’all are ready to throw a parade for winning the first half my goodness.
We can remember what a parade is. This isn’t it.
mksp wrote:everdiso wrote:mksp wrote:Raptors are playing the game of their life and only up 10 lol. 15 TOs, shooting high % from 3.
Philly doing well to take this inevitable game 3 punch and still be in it.
The 6ers are shooting a higher percentage than the Raps.
Try again.
What? That’s bc they’re the better team. Raptors still shooting well.
DonaldSanders wrote:Arsenal wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:
Massive flop.
Where’s GeorgeMarcus? Apparently Embiid only does that to avoid injury haha
Not even close to a flop. Chunky FVV has so much mass there's no way Joel could keep his balance after that contact.
Is this a real post?

eyeatoma wrote:Are you seriously changing what someone has written? As a mod? Isn't there a rule against this?Yuri Vaultin wrote:Arsenal wrote:Refs decided to let TOR play defense to get back in the series.
Fixed it for you.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk

That's what I'm talking about.Yuri Vaultin wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Are you seriously changing what someone has written? As a mod? Isn't there a rule against this?Yuri Vaultin wrote:Fixed it for you.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Bahahahahahaha
Dude's post hasn't been edited, except in my reply. But sure, yeah I'm totally abusing the super retired mod powers I apparently have.
eyeatoma wrote:That's what I'm talking about.Yuri Vaultin wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Are you seriously changing what someone has written? As a mod? Isn't there a rule against this?
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Bahahahahahaha
Dude's post hasn't been edited, except in my reply. But sure, yeah I'm totally abusing the super retired mod powers I apparently have.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk

From the GB rules:PrinceAli wrote:eyeatoma wrote:That's what I'm talking about.Yuri Vaultin wrote:Bahahahahahaha
Dude's post hasn't been edited, except in my reply. But sure, yeah I'm totally abusing the super retired mod powers I apparently have.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Lol you cannot be serious. Go ahead and report him and see what happens
Duffman100 wrote:mksp wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
We can remember what a parade is. This isn’t it.
*
Hilarious that calling it an asterisk actually insults the team Philly had.


eyeatoma wrote:From the GB rules:PrinceAli wrote:eyeatoma wrote:That's what I'm talking about.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Lol you cannot be serious. Go ahead and report him and see what happens
Intentionally misquoting another user (using the function to quote someone, then altering what they wrote) may be judged as a trolling violation and penalized accordingly if a moderator concludes that the intent is to misrepresent or otherwise slander the user being misquoted.
You were saying?
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
