JShuttlesworth wrote:BullyKing wrote:Scottie4Bro wrote:This series is probably a wrap. We suck. We might win game 4 with Scottie. It is what it is.
Masai has thinking to do in the offseason.
I don't think it's really that far off. FVV is clearly extremely hobbled so I wouldn't be too hard on him for a poor series. I think the main thing is moving Siakam. His inability to dribble the ball is just too much for someone who's going to be a top 2-3 option on offense. Move Siakam, continue to make winning moves on the margin (where Masai excels) and wait for the next superstar to demand out elsewhere.
I don't think Masai trades Siakam, I would be very surprised.
Barnes / Siakam / Anunoby is just an awkward front 3 though, with a lot of redundancies. Siakam and Scottie just overlap so much. I just don't see it fitting long term.
We got away with it during the regular season because it seems like someone (between Anunoby and Siakam) was always injured, so we just plugged Scottie in wherever we needed him. Barnes and Siakam do play well together in a 2-Man game.
I really do like all three of those guys, but Scottie and OG are the future. OG is very quietly averaging 24 PPG this series. He isn't necessarily a primary scorer, but he can be super effective in a support role.
Hmm, I kinda feel like the Raptors have something with that trio in the front court. Obviously, the lack of size at the 5 sticks out, particularly in a series against a dominant center, but that level of length/athleticism/switchability is such an advantage defensively, particularly with their frenetic style.
In the end, you win with stars in the NBA, and a lot of what that team can become relies more on Barnes' development and/or whether they can acquire someone. IMO that should be the focus with trades rather than trying to make some type of fit improvement. Having a bunch of long, switchable guys that can shoot isn't redundant in the NBA, it's ideal.













