Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,110
- And1: 370
- Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
The only team I see, so far, that's looking to offload their talent is the Indiana Pacers. They're underachieved in the last couple years and had traded away their star player in Sabonis.
We have a mix of veteran and young pieces to get something done. Myles Turner and Brogdon would be key targets, as it addresses both the backup PG and depth at the 5. But, who to give up to get them?
We have a mix of veteran and young pieces to get something done. Myles Turner and Brogdon would be key targets, as it addresses both the backup PG and depth at the 5. But, who to give up to get them?
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,586
- And1: 11,366
- Joined: Jul 04, 2013
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Brogdon wouldn't be a good fit money-wise, if the team extends Poole.
Too much money committed to guards. Brogdon makes too much to be a backup and Poole will also get too much money not to play less than 30 minutes.
They might as well trade away Moody at that point because they won't be able to give him an extension in 2-3 years.
Too much money committed to guards. Brogdon makes too much to be a backup and Poole will also get too much money not to play less than 30 minutes.
They might as well trade away Moody at that point because they won't be able to give him an extension in 2-3 years.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- GSWFan1994
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,049
- And1: 16,684
- Joined: Oct 31, 2006
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Man, how I wish we could get Paul Reed from the Sixers.
He would fit amazingly well for us.
Any realistic way we could trade for him, guys?
He would fit amazingly well for us.
Any realistic way we could trade for him, guys?
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,564
- And1: 7,494
- Joined: Nov 24, 2003
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
So, people still begging for a wiggs-simmons swap? 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,586
- And1: 11,366
- Joined: Jul 04, 2013
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Siakam is looking good but what did Toronto want?
Way more than Wiggins right?
Way more than Wiggins right?
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,967
- And1: 2,164
- Joined: Nov 03, 2013
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,358
- And1: 1,155
- Joined: Jul 02, 2019
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Given the train wreck that was Brooklyn's season, we're going to hear a lot of this kind of talk. If Kyrie leaves the Nets, such talk will only go into overdrive. Either way, the criticism (much of it undeserved) that will rain down on Durant this off-season may push him towards requesting a trade. Whether he'd have the balls to request a trade back to Golden State is a whole other ball of wax though. Would Lacob even take Durant back? There have to be some lingering hard feelings, you'd imagine. Then, what kind of stupid package would the Nets propose? In the span of a few months, Poole has gone from possible trade bait to presumably off limits. That leaves Kuminga and picks (along with Wiggins) as the basis of a swap. In that case though, what the heck kind of astronomical luxury tax would the Dubs be looking at starting in 2023? Curry, Klay, Draymond, Poole and KD would combine for $200 million in salary. With Steph's and KD's current contracts both running through 2026, the Dubs would have no shot of avoiding luxury tax even after the NBA's TV deals expire in 2025. It all just seems a little too far fetched and too financially burdensome to even entertain the prospect of a KD return. More likely too happen this off-season would be the Warriors trading Wiggins for future assets and picking up someone like Covington to split time with Kuminga while he matures.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,552
- And1: 920
- Joined: Sep 28, 2020
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
ZZzzz
LeBron
AD
Durant
Who else can we trade for to put us over the top?
I really want a Jokic and Giannis front court with CP3 backing up Curry.
Come on, you guys have no idea what it is to watch sports. Stop supporting the back of the jersey. Lets just outspend everyone else and buy our way to another title. It's All-Star time baby!
Drivel.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 812
- And1: 541
- Joined: Aug 18, 2019
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
I wonder what OKC would want for Poku
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,120
- And1: 1,136
- Joined: Feb 03, 2009
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
DevinVassell wrote:Come on, you guys have no idea what it is to watch sports. Stop supporting the back of the jersey. Lets just outspend everyone else and buy our way to another title. It's All-Star time baby!
This.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,020
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Crazy-Canuck wrote:So, people still begging for a wiggs-simmons swap?
It was stupid then, it is beyond stupid now.
Biggest quitter in sports.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,967
- And1: 2,164
- Joined: Nov 03, 2013
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Old_Blue wrote:Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Given the train wreck that was Brooklyn's season, we're going to hear a lot of this kind of talk. If Kyrie leaves the Nets, such talk will only go into overdrive. Either way, the criticism (much of it undeserved) that will rain down on Durant this off-season may push him towards requesting a trade. Whether he'd have the balls to request a trade back to Golden State is a whole other ball of wax though. Would Lacob even take Durant back? There have to be some lingering hard feelings, you'd imagine. Then, what kind of stupid package would the Nets propose? In the span of a few months, Poole has gone from possible trade bait to presumably off limits. That leaves Kuminga and picks (along with Wiggins) as the basis of a swap. In that case though, what the heck kind of astronomical luxury tax would the Dubs be looking at starting in 2023? Curry, Klay, Draymond, Poole and KD would combine for $200 million in salary. With Steph's and KD's current contracts both running through 2026, the Dubs would have no shot of avoiding luxury tax even after the NBA's TV deals expire in 2025. It all just seems a little too far fetched and too financially burdensome to even entertain the prospect of a KD return. More likely too happen this off-season would be the Warriors trading Wiggins for future assets and picking up someone like Covington to split time with Kuminga while he matures.
cap space and luxury tax are increasing by 2022-2023 season so with those numbers is it possible for Golden State to avoid luxury tax hell if such trade goes down
https://www.si.com/nba/2022/03/31/nba-releases-updated-projections-for-salary-cap-luxury-tax
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,008
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Of course we'd do that, Durant's value still way, way higher than that
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,020
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
FNQ wrote:Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Of course we'd do that, Durant's value still way, way higher than that
You'll love this one FNQ.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2188911
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,008
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Coxy wrote:FNQ wrote:Hoopstar23 wrote:Wiggins and a 1st for Durant? anyone?
Of course we'd do that, Durant's value still way, way higher than that
You'll love this one FNQ.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2188911

I actually wouldnt hate this, but it would take several of the following ifs:
- IF Kuminga showed the ability to hold his own in our current defense
- IF Moody showed enough offensively that he could be given the old Wiggins role
- IF we revamped our defense to keep someone like Gobert near the rim as much as possible
- IF we get Dray to sign off on it, which would never happen
- IF we were certain that Poole wanted to stay instead of getting his own team
But for the most part, yeah I predictably hate it. I dont mind Royce O Neale at all, but it takes time for even good defenders to acclimate to our system. I'd prefer continuity over making a big deal in the offseason, unless its for a superstar, and I dont have Gobert as that
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
- whatisacenter
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,260
- And1: 15,378
- Joined: Aug 05, 2013
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
FNQ wrote:Coxy wrote:FNQ wrote:
Of course we'd do that, Durant's value still way, way higher than that
You'll love this one FNQ.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2188911
I actually wouldnt hate this, but it would take several of the following ifs:
- IF Kuminga showed the ability to hold his own in our current defense
- IF Moody showed enough offensively that he could be given the old Wiggins role
- IF we revamped our defense to keep someone like Gobert near the rim as much as possible
- IF we get Dray to sign off on it, which would never happen
- IF we were certain that Poole wanted to stay instead of getting his own team
But for the most part, yeah I predictably hate it. I dont mind Royce O Neale at all, but it takes time for even good defenders to acclimate to our system. I'd prefer continuity over making a big deal in the offseason, unless its for a superstar, and I dont have Gobert as that
It does make some sense if Utah is looking to get out of Gobert's contract but I think Utah would probably want Poole in that deal with Wiggins and Wiseman. Utah isn't a free agent destination so shedding Gobert's salary for an expiring Wiggins contract wouldn't be so beneficial and they might see having Poole as a RFA option as a bonus. Not sure how I really feel about adding Gobert to an aging Warriors core, his contract gets more ridiculous towards the end and he is not a player to build around as Steph, Klay and Dray phase out.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,471
- And1: 4,001
- Joined: May 05, 2005
- Location: Oakland
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Golden State receives: Onyeka Okongwu & Jalen Johnson
Atlanta Hawks receive: James Wiseman & 2022 2nd round pick.
Hawks haven’t played Jalen Johnson at all and Okongwu/Wiseman swap plus a 2nd rounder?
I don’t think ATL does it but that would be huge for Warriors if Okongwu can be rotational big and Jalen Johnson improves
Atlanta Hawks receive: James Wiseman & 2022 2nd round pick.
Hawks haven’t played Jalen Johnson at all and Okongwu/Wiseman swap plus a 2nd rounder?
I don’t think ATL does it but that would be huge for Warriors if Okongwu can be rotational big and Jalen Johnson improves
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,358
- And1: 1,155
- Joined: Jul 02, 2019
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
cdubbz wrote:Golden State receives: Onyeka Okongwu & Jalen Johnson
Atlanta Hawks receive: James Wiseman & 2022 2nd round pick.
Hawks haven’t played Jalen Johnson at all and Okongwu/Wiseman swap plus a 2nd rounder?
I don’t think ATL does it but that would be huge for Warriors if Okongwu can be rotational big and Jalen Johnson improves
Been hanging out with the crowd that wanted to draft Jalen Johnson over Kuminga, have you?

Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,471
- And1: 4,001
- Joined: May 05, 2005
- Location: Oakland
-
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
Old_Blue wrote:cdubbz wrote:Golden State receives: Onyeka Okongwu & Jalen Johnson
Atlanta Hawks receive: James Wiseman & 2022 2nd round pick.
Hawks haven’t played Jalen Johnson at all and Okongwu/Wiseman swap plus a 2nd rounder?
I don’t think ATL does it but that would be huge for Warriors if Okongwu can be rotational big and Jalen Johnson improves
Been hanging out with the crowd that wanted to draft Jalen Johnson over Kuminga, have you?
no actually. I was hesitant on him after his disastrous year at Duke, but his upside is high.
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,872
- And1: 2,707
- Joined: May 16, 2005
Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)
cdubbz wrote:Golden State receives: Onyeka Okongwu & Jalen Johnson
Atlanta Hawks receive: James Wiseman & 2022 2nd round pick.
Hawks haven’t played Jalen Johnson at all and Okongwu/Wiseman swap plus a 2nd rounder?
I don’t think ATL does it but that would be huge for Warriors if Okongwu can be rotational big and Jalen Johnson improves
I think Hawks would ask for Kuminga on top of Wiseman at the bare minimum.
Return to Golden State Warriors