TheNetsFan wrote:I'll say it again. We should NOT bid against ourselves. We should NOT provide Kyrie with a max offer. If O'Connor is right & the Nets were willing listeners on Kyrie, that means KD was ok with it.
I think its a double edge sword and I think we need to live with the extension. Kyrie is not the type of guy who is going to get in line because their are incentives. He willingly gave away nearly half his salary this year. without blinking an eye. Kyrie is going to do his own thing regardless. You can walk away completely or just try and keep him in a good headspace. I dont think he is going to opt-in and there is no way we strong arm him to do that. we saw how that approach worked this year... it didn't.
To me choices are:
1) Extend him for the max. maybe weasel in some incentives but dont get too cocky and drag the negotiations out. It is in our interests for this to be swift and not Harden 2.0. Live with the consequences. He will miss games to injury, games to personal reasons. I doubt see him missing half a year again, that was more mandate then it was Kyrie. I think he did want to play and would have played 60+ games otherwise. at 30 years old, and in great shape, and with a skilled game, he should be between all-star and all-nba for the duration.
2) Don't extend him, and when he opts out let him walk. Find a way to sell it to KD. The problem with this approach is it doesnt leave KD with much to work with. We are still way over the cap even without Kyrie. So we cant use his savings to sign anyone. Ben is a big unknown. when will he play? he good will he be? how reliable will he be.
Getting Harden initially was big because he was an ironman and great Kyrie insurance. If We had a healthy engaged Harden, KD has the Harden/KD duo to fall back on. But of course the Nets are cursed so the second Harden is here he stops being injury free, gets fat, dogs it, and demands out.
So, how do you get KD's buy in to spend the next 3 years in a "big 2" with a Ben Simmons who has a back issue and mental block? We dont have trade assets. Any Kyrie or Ben trade gets severly diminished returns.
So for me, get whatever protections or concessions have little/no pushback from Kyrie's side and get it done. Max vs. 5-7 million less then max honestly wont mean much. We are way in the tax with this trio either way. 1 less year would help alot. but again, Kyrie either agrees or doesnt, you cant strong arm him and he is too unpredictable to call any bluffs like we did with the vaccine.