Texas Chuck wrote:
So you realize that Luka and Brunson and Dinwiddie did almost nothing at the rim, right? Guess which two players lead the playoffs in drives per game? Luka and Brunson.
Well 10.3% of Brunson's shots were from 3 feet within and he made 76.9% of those. Doesn't seem wildly different than what he did in the regular season.
Texas Chuck wrote:He's been a massive deterrent and he made the game become the ultimate miss/make game. In the first half Dallas missed, and because of Gobert couldn't change their attack. In the 2nd half they made their shots(because Mitchell is the worst defensive guard not named Trae) and Dallas managed to steal the game.
So we're going back to blaming Mitchell's defense. The Jazz wouldn't be close to the offensive force they've been without him, and as shown this series, their offense takes a good dip when he's not playing well. For the longest time on this board, basically the whole time I've been here, everyone said how point guard defense wasn't a deal breaker. It's matters, but I don't think we can swing so far in the other direction and think it can single handedly ruin a defense or lose a series that seems ridiculous.
Texas Chuck wrote:Stop looking at box score stats to decide if a player has impact.
Did I ever say Gobert didn't have impact? No. You guys just can't handle that I think differently about it so you engage in these exaggerations.
Goes back to the original question "is Gobert a
Superstar?" Maybe we have different definitions. We all know how great his defense is, but his defense is never going to be the primary reason for a team winning a series let alone a championship. As much as his guards may let him down on defense, they completely carry his ass too on the other end. If you think a guy who plays great defense, but can't create his own shot or pass well is going to lead you to a title we're just not going to agree here.