Colbinii wrote:No-more-rings wrote:sp6r=underrated wrote:I'm a huge Duncan guy. I truly believe 05 was Duncan's peak. It was at the age you'd expect a peak to occur, when a player has sufficient experience but still most of their young athletic ability. But he had a devastating injury that year and wasn't really healthy until 2007.
So I go Manu. Manu was in my mind top 5 caliber from 05-07. After that he started getting chronically hurt and had to have significant minutes reductions.
What devastating injury are you referring to exactly? I think Duncan hurt his ankle or something, but statistically there' nothing to suggest Duncan at any point was playing at or above his 2003 level.
He sprained his ankle on March 21st, the same ankle he sprained earlier in the year.
So I guess Colbini also feels an ankle sprain is a "devastating injury" when it comes to Tim Duncan? :|
Does any other Top 10-20 star get this kind of preferential treatment? We hold everyone else's career under the minutest of microscopes.