emunney wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:tydett wrote:
The question that it comes down to for me: if Giannis weren't on the team or unavailable for some reason, does Budenholzer still have a job here? Yes, they beat the pretender Hawks last year with Giannis down. But Giannis has done a hell of a job making Bud look really good. I'm not convinced that he's truly in the top tier despite winning a championship..
I put Bud top five. And I think if we lost Giannis, and he had to re-tool, this team would win 50 games most years. He's that good a coach IMO.
Where all these guys get into trouble is player personnel moves. Bud's had his hand in things, and we've seen the good, like Pat C., who he really wanted in. And we've also seen the bad, where he's bringing George Hill back and playing him a lot.
Same problem on the personnel front with Kidd here, but even worse. Kidd made this team believe, and shaped Giannis into being a man. Huge help. But then he's telling Lasry and Hammond that he needs Greivis Vasquez at all costs, since we need an "assist getting" PG. Or we need to draft his agent's client Rashad Vaughn, over Bobby Portis.
The thing that really scares me about Bud is when he got full control of Atlanta personnel and swapped out Horford for Dwight. Unconscionable.
I remember thinking at the time it seemed like Horford wanted a change of scenery but I don’t remember what I based that on.
Looked it up: ATL supposedly offered Al 5/136, and he ended up taking BOS’s 4/113. Idk if ATL could’ve offered a bigger 4-year deal.
But they didn’t give all that money to Dwight (3/70) tho, so it looks like they preferred Dwight + $66M over Al?
Or possible they knew Al was leaving and Dwight was a consolation prize.
For whatever that’s worth.
But yeah, preferring Dwight over Al would be nuts, IF that’s what happened. Idk.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app



















