soboMP3 wrote:rilamann wrote:rilamann wrote:Carter was a big part of our win in game 1.
Carter's defense and ability to press Boston bringing the ball up has a lot of value, especially with Boston not having a true PG.It was extremely evident in game 1.
With Carter in the game, Boston would have less time to run their sets which would lead to them getting lesser quality shots, and Carter plays that type of defense that wears you down.
My post before game 5 last week.

At least Spo knows what's up.
Yep, and surprise - the only game we won singlehandedly.
What I truly can't get over is that there is no defensible plausible logic as to why he didn't try this again. Like it's not rational behavior.
Even with MM, you know why he'd run, run, pass with 4 minutes left and a 12 point lead. You disagree, but you know why.
I haven't posted this frequently since Thon's yearbook when it was totally obvious the Bucks were duped. This has a similar unfathomable quality that I can't get over
