falcolombardi wrote:couldnt watch the game last night
were the warriors that good or dallas that bad? (or both?)
Dallas missed some open threes early, but so did the Warriors (Klay was 0-4 in the first half and 7-9 in the second, Steph was 1-6 in the first quarter and 6-11 after that). The Warriors defense had them off-balance for most of the game, throwing various looks at them. The five-man zone and box-and-one were effective (the Warriors have become very good at zone, which is tailor-made for Draymond's skills). The Mavs didn't handle the Warriors motion very well. The Warriors crushed them on the boards, 51-35.
Wiggins was great on both ends as the primary defender on Luka and the beneficiary of the Mavs taking away threes and the Warriors motion creating openings in the midrange. Looney, Poole, and Porter all had good games. Steph didn't shoot all that great (again) and missed free throws (again) but had game highs in points (21) and rebounds (12).
The Mavs are good defensively but aren't as imposing as Memphis was (especially after Ja went out). It didn't help Dallas that Kleber got in foul trouble, but not having to deal with JJJ and Steven Adams is like a breath of fresh air.
It is so much fun seeing Wiggins blossom and the rest of the team lavish praise on him at every opportunity, which they have been doing all postseason. Instead of the stoic, joyless automaton that he was in Minnesota, he's actually smiling and making jokes in the postgame media session. He's loving life and playing great.
It's just one game. The Mavs will adjust and shoot better. The Warriors are known to lay an egg or two during a series. Luka and Dinwiddie seemed unfazed in the postgame comments, which is good. They didn't beat Phoenix by tucking their tails and going home. But the Warriors will be a far great challenge than the Suns.
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.