Xatticus wrote:zaymon wrote:Xatticus wrote:
We've seen a number of teams playing two bigs and benefiting from doing so. The Cavs did all year long. The Celtics took off when they started playing with two bigs. We had a top-10 defense for the last half of the season while playing two bigs and switching everything.
I see Chet slotting right into Bamba's role last year and I believe we have the potential to be a very good defensive team.
Well its working to some extent but is it the best option ? Celtics play two undersized bulky big man which are nothing like Holmgren. Cavs had also Allen and Okoro. Holmgren is slimmer and less mobile than Mobley. There is athletic threshold somewhere.
When WCJ played without Bamba we were overall better defensively looking at lineup stats
I'm not advocating for it. I just believe there is more than one way to skin the cat. It's not some conventional formula that matters. It's all about the personnel.
Allen and Timelord are absolutely traditional fives though. It's not a criticism, but when you look at what they do on the floor... they protect the rim, they screen and dive, and they rim run. Brandon Clarke is another guy that fits into that same type of role. Horford and Mobley are obviously far more versatile and that's what makes it work.
I wouldn't have believed that a Bamba/WCJ pairing would've worked before the season, but it was just fine. It was quite good at the defensive end. Given that, I just don't have any doubts that Holmgren and WCJ would work together swimmingly.
While i agree with you and have Holmgren second on my board i just cant imagine we pass Banchero. I was really meh on him until i saw his stats and watched more film (duh). I am so giddy to watch Banchero and Wagner together. So much ball handling and passing.
WCJ/Bamba 109.2 defrtg, WCJ/Okeke 100.1 defrtg.
I just worry Holmgren wont be able to switch like Allen and Timelord can. They are also thick dudes






































