Malcolm Brogdon
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Capn'O, dakomish23, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,775
- And1: 906
- Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Wrong direction, adding another guy who is older and injury prone although he is good when healthy, we aren't a competitive team.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Junior
- Posts: 259
- And1: 440
- Joined: Jan 30, 2021
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
EMG518 wrote:Wrong direction, adding another guy who is older and injury prone although he is good when healthy, we aren't a competitive team.
Don't disagree. But if it is part of a package that ships Randle out, keeps our youth and Brogdon comes off the bench, sign me up.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- 2010
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,071
- And1: 39,661
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Why would Indiana want Randle? They’re rebuilding.
1: Holiday | Sexton | Holiday
2: White | Thybulle | Holiday
3: Thompson | Porter Jr. | Lewis
4: Wembanyama | Vanderbilt | Wood
5: Gobert | Looney | X
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,775
- And1: 906
- Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
strummer wrote:EMG518 wrote:Wrong direction, adding another guy who is older and injury prone although he is good when healthy, we aren't a competitive team.
Don't disagree. But if it is part of a package that ships Randle out, keeps our youth and Brogdon comes off the bench, sign me up.
If it's straight up I would do it. We can get Brogdan on a shorter contract. I wouldn't move anything of value though, definitely no picks.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- moocow007
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,085
- And1: 25,553
- Joined: Jan 07, 2002
- Location: In front of the computer, where else?
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Brogdon as an expiring (what I thought he was) for the 11th overall pick = bad idea. Brogdon signed for $25 million per through 2024-25 (what apparently is) for the 11th overall pick = bad idea.
The only real way this makes sense (maybe) is if the Pacers want to move Brogdon's contract. Then we can package some expirings and maybe the Dallas 1st.
And before anyone starts with the Randle for Brogdon silliness...the only reason trading for Brogdon makes sense is if they want to pair him with Randle. Randle is the only core guy on this team that even remotely fits Brogdon's timeline.
The only real way this makes sense (maybe) is if the Pacers want to move Brogdon's contract. Then we can package some expirings and maybe the Dallas 1st.
And before anyone starts with the Randle for Brogdon silliness...the only reason trading for Brogdon makes sense is if they want to pair him with Randle. Randle is the only core guy on this team that even remotely fits Brogdon's timeline.
Subscribe to NBNF!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- Iron Mantis
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,025
- And1: 19,615
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
strummer wrote:EMG518 wrote:Wrong direction, adding another guy who is older and injury prone although he is good when healthy, we aren't a competitive team.
Don't disagree. But if it is part of a package that ships Randle out, keeps our youth and Brogdon comes off the bench, sign me up.
No chance.
Do you realize who the coach is?
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- newyorker4ever
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,399
- And1: 4,659
- Joined: Jan 03, 2012
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
People sleeping on Brogdon like this guy can't play ball and play it really well on both sides of the floor. I'm not saying i would give up the 11th pick for him but you aren't getting this guy for free. I get the health issues and wish he didn't have them but if he could give this team somewhere around 60 games a year and we can manage those health issues the best they possibly could be managed to where he's used less in the 1st half of the year so he's around for the 2nd half and hopefully the playoffs then i'm all for trading for him for the right price, but i also realize something will have to be given up to get a talent like him.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,757
- And1: 5,394
- Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Brogdon is a great player.
The injuries kinda scare me ?
He was healthy to end the season , Pacer never brought him back for the tank.
Defensive and pretty good fit with RJ. Worth bringing in if price not too steep .
The injuries kinda scare me ?
He was healthy to end the season , Pacer never brought him back for the tank.
Defensive and pretty good fit with RJ. Worth bringing in if price not too steep .
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,670
- And1: 7,056
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
newyorker4ever wrote:People sleeping on Brogdon like this guy can't play ball and play it really well on both sides of the floor. I'm not saying i would give up the 11th pick for him but you aren't getting this guy for free. I get the health issues and wish he didn't have them but if he could give this team somewhere around 60 games a year and we can manage those health issues the best they possibly could be managed to where he's used less in the 1st half of the year so he's around for the 2nd half and hopefully the playoffs then i'm all for trading for him for the right price, but i also realize something will have to be given up to get a talent like him.
I would rather risk it with the 11th rather than trade it for street clothes brogdon
when your coach is tom thibodeau, getting players that are made of glass is a big no-no, we already have d-rose and we dont need another guy who cant stay on the floor
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- Iron Mantis
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,025
- And1: 19,615
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Knicks are nowhere near competing and Randle is not a championship piece.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- Marty McFly
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,634
- And1: 9,345
- Joined: Sep 15, 2009
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks are nowhere near competing and Randle is not a championship piece.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
This.
I don't understand knick fans that pine over these fringe all stars in this manner. like, bro can we get a franchise player before we start rounding out the core first? This isn't baseball. there's a salary cap in the NBA. Paying Robins and Nightwings 25 mill a year like we have a Giannis on our team.
and even then, we might actually be able to develop someone into a Brogdon or Brunson if we actually gave them playing time.
We have Reddish, Quickley, Grimes, McBride and Rokas. They have evident talent. If they can't develop one of those guys into a at least a starter, then they're just bad at their job.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles
Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,876
- And1: 873
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Can't see the Knicks going for Brogdon with Rose also having injuries recently. They'll need some stability at PG.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- HarthorneWingo
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,199
- And1: 58,177
- Joined: May 16, 2005
- Location: In Your Head, USA
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
2010 wrote:Why would Indiana want Randle? They’re rebuilding.
Randle's 28. Not really old. He's an established scorer and rebounder in the league and they still get the no. 11 pick. But I'd rather do the Portland deal where we'd waive Bledsoe.
Free Palestine
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,438
- And1: 1,143
- Joined: Mar 14, 2015
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks are nowhere near competing and Randle is not a championship piece.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
What if trading randle means getting brogdon in return? You have to march salaries somehow
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,670
- And1: 7,056
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
blanko wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks are nowhere near competing and Randle is not a championship piece.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
What if trading randle means getting brogdon in return? You have to march salaries somehow
I dont think pacers would do that unless a frp is given by the knicks
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,294
- And1: 4,867
- Joined: Jul 21, 2001
- Location: East of West and West of East.
- Contact:
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
2010 wrote:Why would Indiana want Randle? They’re rebuilding.
I didn't like the trade in the my first post, but I like it less now.
That said, I'd trade Randle for Brogdon in a heartbeat. I wouldn't include the #11. I don't know what I'd include to sweeten the deal, but Randle for Brogdon - if Indy was game, absolutely.
No ears were harmed. Carry on with your Sunday afternoon
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,294
- And1: 4,867
- Joined: Jul 21, 2001
- Location: East of West and West of East.
- Contact:
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Dave DaButcher wrote:?s=21&t=mtXw2rwSlyzA56yEHgw3_w
As non-credible as Berman, so I will choose to believe this one.
Welp, that'll teach me to believe the rumors I read. I should know better.
No ears were harmed. Carry on with your Sunday afternoon
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,841
- And1: 15,878
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
Marty McFly wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks are nowhere near competing and Randle is not a championship piece.
Priority #1 before anything: trade Randle.
No Brogdon.
After coming to the Knicks his value will be negative. If healthy, he will help the Knicks fight for the play-in while stifling player development.
Stick to the script: Draft and develop a guard and develop the ones you have.
This.
I don't understand knick fans that pine over these fringe all stars in this manner. like, bro can we get a franchise player before we start rounding out the core first? This isn't baseball. there's a salary cap in the NBA. Paying Robins and Nightwings 25 mill a year like we have a Giannis on our team.
and even then, we might actually be able to develop someone into a Brogdon or Brunson if we actually gave them playing time.
We have Reddish, Quickley, Grimes, McBride and Rokas. They have evident talent. If they can't develop one of those guys into a at least a starter, then they're just bad at their job.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,670
- And1: 7,056
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
due diligence, they are listening offers for the 11th pick
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
- Reign23
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,023
- And1: 11,323
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
- Location: Germany.
Re: Malcolm Brogdon
"11th pick for Brogdon?? no way !!!! treadmill move !!! classic knicks !!!!"
10 months later
"how come we still don't have a PG?"
"why is Thibs playing Burks as the starting playmaker?"
"why isn't the 11th pick playing???"
I love you all. really.
10 months later
"how come we still don't have a PG?"
"why is Thibs playing Burks as the starting playmaker?"
"why isn't the 11th pick playing???"
I love you all. really.
formerly known as knickst4pe