Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
DrCoach
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,952
- And1: 4,338
- Joined: May 24, 2014
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Cweb career PER 20.9
Sheed 17.0
Sheed 17.0
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
xinxin
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,812
- And1: 1,543
- Joined: Jul 01, 2018
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
vital_signs wrote:xinxin wrote:Big J wrote:
Refs have screwed a lot of guys. The great ones don't make excuses.
Those ‘02 Kings had their chance to wrap it up in game 7, at home… but they didn’t ….since they crapped in their pants ..
I Can still remember all those bricked 3s and FTs…. No excuses , if you’re really a great.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wish there was a way to block Lakers fans from talking on this subject. They shouldn't have had to wrap it up in 7, just admit it for once.
Why should we shut up? Game 5 had highly questionable calls against the lakers & they lost by 1. Shaq fouled out with almost 4 mins left in the game. Of course nobody talks about this & would rather single out Game 6. If it’s true that there was a directive, it was most likely to make up for the horrible officiating in the previous game.
The kings had more FTS for the entire series. & lakers had more fouls called against them.
Perhaps you should read this first
https://www.reddit.com/r/nbadiscussion/comments/hvpm2a/the_myth_of_the_rigged_2002_wcf/
Kings lost because they crapped their pants in game 7 - at home..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
hoosierdaddy34
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,168
- And1: 5,729
- Joined: Dec 05, 2016
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Rasheed. Criminally underrated how good he was. No coincidence that he was on the Trailblazers when they were great and the Pistons when they won the title. He was great at both ends of the floor as well. When Rasheed was at his best, all time greats had a ton of problems dealing with him.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
hoosierdaddy34
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,168
- And1: 5,729
- Joined: Dec 05, 2016
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
vital_signs wrote:xinxin wrote:Big J wrote:
Refs have screwed a lot of guys. The great ones don't make excuses.
Those ‘02 Kings had their chance to wrap it up in game 7, at home… but they didn’t ….since they crapped in their pants ..
I Can still remember all those bricked 3s and FTs…. No excuses , if you’re really a great.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wish there was a way to block Lakers fans from talking on this subject. They shouldn't have had to wrap it up in 7, just admit it for once.
Why? So you can spew your nonsense and haterism unchallenged? Go pound sand.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
taufblazers33
- Starter
- Posts: 2,356
- And1: 654
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Sheed, better defensive player.
ADawg22 wrote:Cavs announcer sounds like he has an orgasm everytime one of their players score.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
taufblazers33
- Starter
- Posts: 2,356
- And1: 654
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
hoosierdaddy34 wrote:Rasheed. Criminally underrated how good he was. No coincidence that he was on the Trailblazers when they were great and the Pistons when they won the title. He was great at both ends of the floor as well. When Rasheed was at his best, all time greats had a ton of problems dealing with him.
Agree! well said.
ADawg22 wrote:Cavs announcer sounds like he has an orgasm everytime one of their players score.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
- Stromile12
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,591
- And1: 14,077
- Joined: Oct 22, 2006
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Sheed would be amazing in today's game
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
vital_signs
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,368
- And1: 2,239
- Joined: Feb 12, 2015
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
hoosierdaddy34 wrote:vital_signs wrote:xinxin wrote:Those ‘02 Kings had their chance to wrap it up in game 7, at home… but they didn’t ….since they crapped in their pants ..
I Can still remember all those bricked 3s and FTs…. No excuses , if you’re really a great.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wish there was a way to block Lakers fans from talking on this subject. They shouldn't have had to wrap it up in 7, just admit it for once.
Why? So you can spew your nonsense and haterism unchallenged? Go pound sand.
Inadequate perception I reckon it's from the Valium
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
TheWhiteMamba
- Junior
- Posts: 479
- And1: 363
- Joined: Jan 25, 2012
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
I loved Rasheed, but Webber was the better player. If you hipotetically have to pick the reincarnation of those two players (with all their attributes intact) you'll pick Chris Webber.
Maybe if you give Rasheed a Kobe mindset, then who knows...
Maybe if you give Rasheed a Kobe mindset, then who knows...
I'm Italian, forgive me if my English is not good.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
hoosierdaddy34
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,168
- And1: 5,729
- Joined: Dec 05, 2016
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
vital_signs wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:vital_signs wrote:I wish there was a way to block Lakers fans from talking on this subject. They shouldn't have had to wrap it up in 7, just admit it for once.
Why? So you can spew your nonsense and haterism unchallenged? Go pound sand.
Hit a nerve I see
Yes people that whine about refs and look for QANON conspiracies rather than just admit their team wasn’t good enough to win, are annoying as crap to me. It’s a major problem with sports fans today, they’d rather look for a bunch of made up nonsense as an explanation than just admit their team **** the bed.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
FluLikeSymptoms
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,114
- And1: 8,717
- Joined: Nov 26, 2004
- Location: TBD
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Not crazy. I loved Sheed but Webber was really good. Sheed didn’t care about stats and Webber very much did. I’d take Webber if I wanted a #1 on a no-hope franchise, and Sheed if I needed a #2 on a contender.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
tsherkin
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 92,456
- And1: 32,029
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
\hoosierdaddy34 wrote:vital_signs wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:
Why? So you can spew your nonsense and haterism unchallenged? Go pound sand.
Hit a nerve I see
Yes people that whine about refs and look for QANON conspiracies rather than just admit their team wasn’t good enough to win, are annoying as crap to me. It’s a major problem with sports fans today, they’d rather look for a bunch of made up nonsense as an explanation than just admit their team **** the bed.
Guys, can we just table this so the mods don't have to do something about it? We're talking about Webber and Sheed here, not Lakers-Kings, c'mon.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
vital_signs
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,368
- And1: 2,239
- Joined: Feb 12, 2015
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
hoosierdaddy34 wrote:vital_signs wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:
Why? So you can spew your nonsense and haterism unchallenged? Go pound sand.
Hit a nerve I see
Yes people that whine about refs and look for QANON conspiracies rather than just admit their team wasn’t good enough to win, are annoying as crap to me. It’s a major problem with sports fans today, they’d rather look for a bunch of made up nonsense as an explanation than just admit their team **** the bed.
Bruh, I hated the Kings more than the Lakers growing up so this isn't about my team. Watch the videos. Excluding the Divac foul, where Webber committed a fire prior, it was a horrendously called game in favor of the Lakers. QANON, lmao. Get bent kid.
Inadequate perception I reckon it's from the Valium
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
hoosierdaddy34
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,168
- And1: 5,729
- Joined: Dec 05, 2016
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
vital_signs wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:vital_signs wrote:Hit a nerve I see
Yes people that whine about refs and look for QANON conspiracies rather than just admit their team wasn’t good enough to win, are annoying as crap to me. It’s a major problem with sports fans today, they’d rather look for a bunch of made up nonsense as an explanation than just admit their team **** the bed.
Bruh, I hated the Kings more than the Lakers growing up so this isn't about my team. Watch the videos. Excluding the Divac foul, where Webber committed a fire prior, it was a horrendously called game in favor of the Lakers. QANON, lmao. Get bent kid.
Nonsense. And Ive been watching this game for 40 years. Have a good time at your next QANON meet and greet. Maybe Donaghy will be there and he will sell you a signed copy of his book for $799. As WC Fields said, there is a Sucker born every minute. Plenty to make money off of.
Warning to both users for derailing.
-js21
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
longtallbrad
- Junior
- Posts: 436
- And1: 268
- Joined: Nov 02, 2017
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Easily Webber for me. Just a much higher peak and greater potential. Yes, Wallace was a considerably better defender, but I think of him as a high-value role player rather than a talent you can actually build around.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
- JasonStern
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,214
- And1: 4,273
- Joined: Dec 13, 2008
-
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
Reeko wrote:Rasheed was as talented as anyone during that era, it was just a matter of if he felt like being engaged in the game.
Exactly this. It should have been Sheed easily, but he never really had the work ethic. I remember one season with the Blazers he intentionally sucked for a stretch right before the all-star selections were announced as he wanted the weekend off.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Re: Who was better?
- floppymoose
- Senior Mod - Warriors

- Posts: 59,381
- And1: 17,496
- Joined: Jun 22, 2003
- Location: Trust your election workers
Re: Who was better?
Coxy wrote:Peak - Webber.
Career - Rasheed.
This is how I feel as well. I voted Rasheed because I was thinking of the question as better career.
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
-
FluLikeSymptoms
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,114
- And1: 8,717
- Joined: Nov 26, 2004
- Location: TBD
Re: Who was better? (Chris Webber v Rasheed Wallace)
I always rate who was better by their peaks. Longevity is more of a tie-breaker.


